we could easily have been 4-2 to this point (Michigan and Illinois)Hard not to love this team!
Damn that missed field goal vs. Michigan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we could easily have been 4-2 to this point (Michigan and Illinois)Hard not to love this team!
Damn that missed field goal vs. Michigan
That’s what next week is for.Now if we can only win at home.
So proud of these guys. After last week's gut wrenching loss I thought today would be an emotionless bust. Great job team and coaches!
Nah, I stayed home tonight *😊I thought that was my neighbors wife!
Anyone hear me yell YES!!!!!! from 9,000 miles away?
My feelings exactly. If we went to ground and pound in the last two minutes vs. Illinois and in our first OT possession vs. Michigan.we could easily have been 4-2 to this point (Michigan and Illinois)
Agree.Despite a bunch of No calls, we somehow prevail at the end. Good thing Purdue only had 2 TOs left. Don't understand how losing 5 yards on kneel downs gained anything. At least run laterally and go down to waste time and make the refs take additional time to reset the ball.
I was way more concerned with the shotgun snaps there vs. Under center.Despite a bunch of No calls, we somehow prevail at the end. Good thing Purdue only had 2 TOs left. Don't understand how losing 5 yards on kneel downs gained anything. At least run laterally and go down to waste time and make the refs take additional time to reset the ball.
This is the most important halftime of Schianos second tenure
Can he make adjustments to stop this runaway train, or is it more of the same? We will find out.
I think Gleeson is incredible.what do you think now?
on top of that I will add that the players all gained a bit of confidence in the coaches from something like this..I loved this game. I think Glennon has learned something about Big Ten football vs. Ivy League football. Going to the run and not getting too cute with trick plays and swing passes (at the end of the game when victory is within grasp with some conservative play calling) sealed the deal. As I said above, if we had run that 4th quarter offense that we did today in the last two minutes vs, Illinois and in our first OT possession last week, we may have won those games. Anyway, look forward, not behind. What a vast improvement over the last few years. Rutgers is competitive in the Big Ten and fun to watch.
It was said at the start of the season Gleeson is very versed in playing multiple quarterbacks. I think we will continue to see that.Somebody's gotta ask this:Who starts next week?
Is it possible both QBs were told they would get a half? We've gone from having NO QBs of note vs Illinois to 3 now... each with their value proposition.It was said at the start of the season Gleeson is very versed in playing multiple quarterbacks. I think we will continue to see that.
We stink
If Vedral is healthy he will start. If not, Sit starts. But in either case Langan plays A LOTSomebody's gotta ask this:Who starts next week?
Yep. I was wrong . It happenslooks like you shot your load a little early
I’m sure It was played out as it was playing out. Gleeson doesn’t strike me as a guy who sticks to a scripted plan. His feel for a game is like nothing we’ve had here before.Is it possible both QBs were told they would get a half? We've gone from having NO QBs of note vs Illinois to 3 now... each with their value proposition.
Shall we continue to look for a 4th?
AbsolutelyIt was said at the start of the season Gleeson is very versed in playing multiple quarterbacks. I think we will continue to see that.
we could easily have been 4-2 to this point (Michigan and Illinois)
can you imagine if Gleeson hit on that Sitkowski QB Draw? Just "wow".. taking out a running QB to.. RUN THE QB.. it was flippin' genius but just did not mesh with what the D ran.I love the multiple QB concept. There are so many accepted no-no's in football which need to be challenged. We've already seen a few this season. Schiano is a great football mind but its clear that schiano 2.0 is open minded enough to let Gleeson challenge the orthodoxy.
Purdue should be getting flagged for unsportsmanlike each time they hit Langan on the kneel down.
I dunno... at RB maybe he loses a step and he does run a bit upright. And next thing you know the play does send him north and south... I am convinced we can use more dives to Pachecko and Adams... none of this pussyfooting running outside.. just have the OL fire out.. like with Langan runs.. and hand it off fast..They should work Langan in at RB.
I've been slowly looking at a lot of different SUV's, but haven't been interested in the Pilot, although I'm sure it's a nice vehicle.Go with the Honda Pilot
I believe you are correct. I would like to seeI’m sure It was played out as it was playing out. Gleeson doesn’t strike me as a guy who sticks to a scripted plan. His feel for a game is like nothing we’ve had here before.
You do realize he didn't move his head on that entire play. He was staring down Adams the entire time.....
patting myself on the back.. as Toure had the interception because he dropped into coverage on a zone blitz with a DB blitzing..our LBs cannot cover.. you might as well blitz em.. even a zone blitz.. DE can cover as well as the LBs have
cmon turnover