yes, you absolutely can “judge” and It was disgusting. Called it a month ago. That’s what a disgrace our women’s basketball program has become thx to CVS doing absolutely nothing but collecting a paycheck her last decade.
Rutgers Women's Basketball to Host No. 4/3 Iowa on Friday in Front of Sold Out Crowd
- Thread starter Tango Two
- Start date
I’m
You keep saying that some of us only post when bad things happen. Gee, maybe there’s a reason for that? Tell me when the last time was something good happen with this program? I’ll be waiting lol!
oh, now we’re blaming the administration? Comical.
You keep saying that some of us only post when bad things happen. Gee, maybe there’s a reason for that? Tell me when the last time was something good happen with this program? I’ll be waiting lol!
Can u come back and disgust the men getting annihilated by an 0-3 in the B1G Iowa men's team? Don't think Iowas is ranked #4 like the Iowa women's team.
And you need to sit down and shut up on your position about CVS.
Last edited:
and the real reason is:
WBB isn't a program you root for and it's been a winning one for years until recently..
i don't wonder why some mainly post complaints after loses and only occasionally post after wins.
They are bandwagon fans and really don't care for the program r they would admit the RU WBB program has had mainly winning records and only when Eatman took over did the team start losing.
As for your: "oh, now we’re blaming the administration? Comical." BS
lack of support is the reason RU MBB and RU FB had problems
Now more support has come, but for RU FB & MBB that lack of support resulted in losing seasons , while the RU WBB program stayed a winner, but not as good as a program as it once was.
Seems like some like to ignore that fact and act like the R WBB program received full support while the MBB & FB programs were left to starve
Don't try to make excuses for not liking RU WBB, your excuse for that is easily seen as the BS it is..
If you complained you were disappointed the RU WBB program didn't maintain it's top program standers of years ago, then I could agree and feel you really cared.
But acting like the WBB program has been a loser for years only proves your so-called fanhood and caring about the WBB program is BS
Check the record ( conviently posted in this thread) and see how wrong you are when acting like the program sucked for years.
True fans know it didn't suck, it just didn't match the type of program it was years ago and wasn't living up to the expectitations of retirning to the type of program it was during irs glory days.
You ignore when good things happen so your complaints that imply the program has been a loser for a long time liiks vailed when it's only a lie.
The program had been winning just about every year under CVS , but it hasn't been one of the better programs like it was once before
When you ask last time something good happened, I feel making the NCAA Tourney is a good thing.(last time was the 2020-21 season
But good things like that don't fit the omage of a bad program and making RU WBB look like it's been a loser for years is your agenda.
I call that agenda a bunch of BS
Last edited:
PAYCHECK CHECK.
Not as good as back in the day, but CVS kept the program a winner while other programs were losing
| 2010–11 | Rutgers | 20–13 | 11–5 | 4th | NCAA Division I Second Round |
| 2011–12 | Rutgers | 22–10 | 10–6 | 6th | NCAA Division I First Round |
| 2012–13 | Rutgers | 16–14 | 7–9 | T–9th | |
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (American Athletic Conference) (2013–2014) | |||||
| 2013–14 | Rutgers | 28–9 | 12–6 | 4th | WNIT Champions |
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (Big Ten Conference) (2014–2022) | |||||
| 2014–15 | Rutgers | 23–10 | 12–6 | T–4th | NCAA Division I Second Round |
| 2015–16 | Rutgers | 19–15 | 7–9 | T–9th | WNIT Second Round |
| 2016–17 | Rutgers | 6–24 | 3–13 | T–11th | |
| 2017–18 | Rutgers | 20–12 | 7–9 | T–9th | |
| 2018–19 | Rutgers | 22–10 | 13–5 | 3rd | NCAA Division I First Round |
| 2019–20 | Rutgers | 22–9 | 11–7 | T–5th | Canceled due to COVID-19 |
| 2020–21 | Rutgers | 14–5 | 10–3 | 3rd | NCAA Division I First Round |
It's hard to win in a tough conference like the BIG with young guards. Smikle once she returns is a difference maker. The FR Petticord and Thompson had nice offer lists including both offered by Iowa, and Huerter played tough all night. With Adams back for another year and a few recruits inside Rutgers could make a jump in the BIG next season.
Blah blah bullshit. Once again, you know, nothing about me. I’ve followed this program since before I was even in school. I followed this team to Saint Joe’s to watch them win Atlantic 10 tournament titles. I’ve been to plenty of games. Shit somewhere at home. I have a T-shirt with double zero on it for Carolyn DeRousse!!!
Enough with your assumptions and stop laying the blame everywhere but where it belongs: CVS.
Say what you will , your body of work here makes me think the fan excuse you're giving doesn't justify the BS you post.
CVS' leave of absence and Eatman's coaching in her place did hurt the program.
But you've been on Stringer's case for years now, ignoring RU making the tourney and having winning seasons most years ( though 5 appearances of 10 eligible ones ) dies leave a little to be desired, but not enough to back up you implying over the years that RU WBB was a loser under CVS.
Just a guess:i you didn't post happiness over the latest commit to the team, you and others seem to ignore the good, but jump on the bad like a mad dog in a meat house .
edit: my sincere apologies about not posting happiness.
You did and probably did it before I started posting this reply to you
When I am wrong , especially when I'm accusing someone of something , I feel the right thing to do is admit I was wrong and apologize for that mistake.
Please accept my apology for accusing you of not speaking out about a great get for the team.
Disagreeing doesn't mean you can't be honest enough to admit when you ate wrong about something
Again I'm sorry to have made a claim that was false and hope my apology for doing so is accepted
CVS' leave of absence and Eatman's coaching in her place did hurt the program.
But you've been on Stringer's case for years now, ignoring RU making the tourney and having winning seasons most years ( though 5 appearances of 10 eligible ones ) dies leave a little to be desired, but not enough to back up you implying over the years that RU WBB was a loser under CVS.
Just a guess:i you didn't post happiness over the latest commit to the team, you and others seem to ignore the good, but jump on the bad like a mad dog in a meat house .
edit: my sincere apologies about not posting happiness.
You did and probably did it before I started posting this reply to you
When I am wrong , especially when I'm accusing someone of something , I feel the right thing to do is admit I was wrong and apologize for that mistake.
Please accept my apology for accusing you of not speaking out about a great get for the team.
Disagreeing doesn't mean you can't be honest enough to admit when you ate wrong about something
Again I'm sorry to have made a claim that was false and hope my apology for doing so is accepted
Last edited:
Iowa, as a team, is obviously on another level than our team at this time. Being forced to play young guards against C. Clark makes that experience gap show up even more in the on-court result. As coach said, our young players need more time in the weight room to be able to be more effective on this level.
Many forgot that we had to play without, not only one, but two players that likely have a huge positive impact on us being more competitive throughout the game. The guard weakness was quickly recognized and exploited all game by Caitlin and the rest of Iowa's perimeter players. Our perimeter toughness was not even dressed for the game.
No doubt, Kaylene is a tough defender. As tough, if not even tougher than Kaylene is one, .......Awa Sidibe. Do they make us winners last night??,......not likely. But we definitely have a more competitive showing.
Put a fork in this thread with the news of our latest commit. And if the crowd Caitlin brought into the RAC helped Kiyomi envision what she can help build here at RU, ....last night's game was a HUGE victory.
Many forgot that we had to play without, not only one, but two players that likely have a huge positive impact on us being more competitive throughout the game. The guard weakness was quickly recognized and exploited all game by Caitlin and the rest of Iowa's perimeter players. Our perimeter toughness was not even dressed for the game.
No doubt, Kaylene is a tough defender. As tough, if not even tougher than Kaylene is one, .......Awa Sidibe. Do they make us winners last night??,......not likely. But we definitely have a more competitive showing.
Put a fork in this thread with the news of our latest commit. And if the crowd Caitlin brought into the RAC helped Kiyomi envision what she can help build here at RU, ....last night's game was a HUGE victory.
