ADVERTISEMENT

Here is the reality on "running an offense ".....

An offensive system is meant to give a schematic advantage over your competition. Look at the data you provided. The leaders of those stats all have easily identifiable offensive systems and schemes. Most of them have one thing in common. An offense built around motion offensive screening principles. You put our roster in any of those systems and I’m sure the data would improve for our players. ISO/horns/4 flat stationary set especially this year the way the roster is constructed was probably the least efficient set.

Would you say Iowa Wisconsin Purdue has an athletic advantage over the rest of the B1G? But they are always near the top of the standings because they run a defined system and recruit to their needs and expectations.
Kapuna, I agree with everything you said except that our kids in a motion offense (which I want) would shoot better. Maybe, maybe not. They have proven too often that they cannot be relied on to knock down a three when it’s needed. That to me goes to recruiting. Pikiell has done a poor job at identifying “complete “ players on both sides of the ball. It’s okay to bring in a few defensive first players and have them grow in Pike’s system, but he must identify and recruit offensive minded players that can develop on the defensive side.

Pike’s inability to bring in pure shooting guards like Spencer or a Gillespie on Maryland is Pike’s fault. Couple that with bad offensive sets like we’ve seen since he got here nine years ago, and you have questionable or poor outcomes.

So, yes we need to recruit complete guards who can knock down threes at or near 40% but even they won’t hit their shots all of the time if they’re stuck in this pathetic resemblance of an offense he runs.
  • Like
Reactions: Freddy Stubbs

Where is BKin118? What are his thoughts?

If Pike ends up with a nice budget to keep Lathan, Grant and Dortch and to get portal players to complement them at a higher level than MAAC-level guys, it will change the complexion of the team. How the talent is distributed is as important as the total dollars on the floor.

For those in the know, what is the aprrox NIL $$$ needed for each of these 3 ?

Men’s Lacrosse Headed to No. 12 Army Saturday

It's been two years. Our offense up until 22 was often very good.
Is this true though? ‘22 was an anomaly. We had a near perfect attack with Scott coming into his own at X, Cameron at the lefty spot who had all around game as a dodger and finisher and Barolo as an absolute righty hammer. Excellent defense with Kirst dropping dimes on the outlets and one of the best DMid units in the nation. Offensive middie might have been a weakness but Jacoby turned out to be a monster portal acquisition and Knobloch took his game to the next level. Plus our Dmids were like 1b on offense as they could have started as offensive middies on most teams.

Prior to then we’ve always had talented offensive players but I recall that we struggled in 6 on 6 sets. But we were early innovators in committing to NASCAR offense (as well as plugging holes thru the portal) and that kept us competitive.

Now most teams run some version of NASCAR and are much better at defending it because they see it far more frequently. And everyone has caught up or surpassed us in portal recruiting. We have not adapted. We can no longer rely on transition goals and our settled offense is simply awful.

And I would argue that outside of 2022 it has been consistently bad but our transition offense was superior so it hid many flaws. We consistently have among the lowest shooting percentage in the country year in and year out. That speaks to the fact that we don’t run an offense that creates open looks. We simply rely on hero ball with 5 dudes standing around watching.

Where is BKin118? What are his thoughts?

This timing coincided with NIL going off the rails, which exposed our fan base's inability and/or lack of desire to play the game with the big boys.

NIL is not being supported by the “regular” fans . The programs that are winning with NIL are essentially riding their 1-3 whales.

Annoying posters on this board keep screaming it’s because our fan base is cheap.
1. We don’t have the history or size of fan base so that’s not going to magically get “willed” into existence
2. People giving 100, 300, or even 1-3k per year are going to make such a little dent. Basically wasting time and resources and breathe even taking about check writers under $25k per year.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT