Tell that to Tom Landry, Don Shula, Chuck Noll and Vince Lombardi, who actually mowed the grass to his liking in Green Bay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell that to Tom Landry, Don Shula, Chuck Noll and Vince Lombardi, who actually mowed the grass to his liking in Green Bay.
No he didn't. Not even close. He put his plan together what was needed for football and let Mulcahy and Pernetti ran Athletics. You are so far off base.That's basically what he did when he was here.
There is a reason virtually every sport died on the vine when he was here.
I'm all for that as long as he takes care OF job number 1 , 2, and 3 first.Tell that to Tom Landry, Don Shula, Chuck Noll and Vince Lombardi, who actually mowed the grass to his liking in Green Bay.
No he didn't. Not even close. He put his plan together what was needed for football and let Mulcahy and Pernetti ran Athletics. You are so far off base.
No they dont know eachother and I am making this up to support my agenda that means absolutely nothing in terms of who get hired.How is Hobbs not a fan of Schiano?? Have they ever even met?? The shit some of you make to support your agenda.
One major problem with this which is conspicuously absent from your thread. Hobbs view of Schiano and Vice versa. By all accounts, the perceptions of each by the other being the biggest impediments to getting the deal done.
How do you know this? Do they even know each other?
How is Hobbs not a fan of Schiano?? Have they ever even met?? The shit some of you make to support your agenda.
Hobbs is probably the least egotistical guy I have ever met in a position of power such as the one he is in.
The stories that people run with here without any first hand knowledge is astounding.
Jersey gossiping is a pastime.
Don’t touch men’s basketball and wrestling. Have at it with the restMeh
That sounds good.
Absolute possibility? Now is that a certainty? or uncertainty? I'm confused.So you're saying its an absolute
possibility
That had zero to do with SchianoIt sounds good that every sport at Rutgers dies on the vine?
Odd position to take.
So I guess you don't remember what happened down in Knoxville, Tenn.?If Schiano was such a good coach. Why didn't he get another job after Ohio State, huh?? What....never mind.
No assistant coach worth having will tolerate being micromanaged for long. Conversely, if an assistant coach cannot perform to expectations without micromanaging, that coach should be replaced.Micromanaging doesn't work in business and it doesn't work in sports. All it does is demoralize those who work for the micromanager. I'm worried if Schiano hasn't changed about that.
That had zero to do with Schiano
I personally know Bob Mulcahy and Tim Pernetti. You couldn't be farther from the truth. Both men like Schiano very much but both wouldn't let him take over anything but football. Schiano didn't want to run the Department at all. Didn't care too.It was more the AD's, but make no mistake. Schiano ran the dept. when he was there.
He won't have that luxury this time. Not in a fully formed department in the B1G anyway.
We need a football coach. If that isn't him, find out who is.
Why not and how do you know? I think Hobbs should be a fan of whomever has the necessary skills for this project and right now I’m pulling for GS. You can assume that any head coach who is up for this gig is going to have an ego, want to do it his way, and be in total control of his program. If Hobbs can’t handle that he needs to take this program down 1AAHobbs is not a fan of Schiano at all and does not want to hire him, but the donors are the people with the real power here and if they chose Schiano its going to be Schiano.
I did offer this: "Another source tells me several of RU's big boosters are pro-Schiano guys, which is no surprise to many who know these boosters. What I don't know is what Hobbs thinks. I can only hope that these boosters are able to convince him that Greg is the best choice - unless Hobbs pulls a rabbit out of the hat and is able to afford bringing in a gamechanger as head coach." The implication, based on what I've read here is that there could be an issue - however, I haven't heard anything from either Hobbs or Schiano about whether there's actually an issue. It's obviously an important element, but I simply don't know anything about it.
I like this post.
Considering that Rome is burning, I find it hard to believe that Hobbs will be able to find a better choice than Schiano.
Unless you are Urban Meyer status, this is a rebuilding nightmare for any incoming coach...especially if you do not have New Jersey ties.
Schiano can build immediate excitement for both fans and recruits (especially graduate transfers from big player stockpile schools like Alabama, MIchigan, and Ohio State that have something to prove. See Schiano players in the NFL!
And the weather.Thanks - the stuff we generally agree on (Rutgers sports) is way more important than the stuff we generally disagree on (the future of the country and mankind, lol).
I don't think the boosters should have any say, and they shouldn't be listened to, unless it's all about the money, which itI posted a couple of months ago about there being mutual interest between Rutgers and Schiano, should Ash falter further and be fired. Nothing with respect to that statement has changed, as there's still strong mutual interest between Rutgers and Schiano, according to my sources. Doesn't mean he'll be hired, but he's absolutely a candidate.
With regard to Greg's interest, the source I've used over the past ~20 years has confirmed that Greg is quite interested in the position. Like any source, it's possible his info is wrong (even though it's first hand, but maybe Greg is just being cagey), but this source is very good friends with Greg from way back in their playing days together at Bucknell and was right when it came to Greg turning down Miami and Michigan.
Another source tells me several of RU's big boosters are pro-Schiano guys, which is no surprise to many who know these boosters. What I don't know is what Hobbs thinks. I can only hope that these boosters are able to convince him that Greg is the best choice - unless Hobbs pulls a rabbit out of the hat and is able to afford bringing in a gamechanger as head coach.
I wasn't intending to rehash my thoughts on why I think Greg is a top choice, but I will repost a few high level points on that (which I just said in another thread on Greg).
Most intelligent people will look at Greg's record and evaluate his 2005-2011 run, after rebuilding the program from the abyss (arguably a worse one than we're in now, since we had no program/facilities, like we do now), where we went 56-33/25-24 and won 5 of 6 bowl games played in 7 years. Including one magical season where we finished #12 in the country and one tragic one, where we went 4-8.
No, we didn't win a BE championship or beat WVU, but we were always in the hunt (in a BE that had slightly better Sagarin ratings than the B1G back then, over those years), but Greg built a good to very good program where there was nothing before, primarily due to his attention to detail, passion, recruiting prowess and ability to spot and develop underappreciated talent. His accomplishments were directly responsible for us getting the new stadium, better facilities, achieving a great APR, and eventually getting the B1G invite.
Lastly, I also think that many of the criticisms of Schiano (control freak, inability to delegate, overly harsh/demanding, etc.) have some validity and Schiano actually agreed with much of the criticism in the Thamel article in SI that came out after Schiano was fired from TB. In that article Schiano really showed some great self-assessment and introspection in sharing some of the things he didn't do well at in the NFL and in college and how his next head coaching gig would incorporate some changes, including a bunch of things he observed in his year after TB, visiting other teams.
Many of the things he discussed, if Greg addresses them as well as he articulated them, would likely address the concerns many have, IMO. Plus, he doesn't have to build the foundation of a program any more (facilities, stadium and academic support are all in place, although obviously facilities can't remain stagnant) and should be able to focus on recruiting and coaching talent.
The one thing I do wonder about is whether anyone has done an assessment of how much he changed his approach at OSU or if that isn't really a valid thing to assess, since he wasn't the head coach and had to defer to Meyer in many things. If we could truly have a "new and improved" Schiano, who was a bit less of an overly demanding micromanager (including actually trusting an OC), who also gave more freedom to his players and wasn't a jerk to people in the athletic department (and even NFL scouts), while still retaining his passion for recruiting, discipline and coaching/developing talent, then I think he'd very likely be the best choice.
Even getting the old Greg back might still be the best choice amongst the candidates we hear about, but I love the idea of a better version of Schiano. Perhaps we can do better than Greg, but we're more likely to do worse with most of the names being bandied about and I'd rather go with what we know than an unknown (unless we're talking crazy good candidates like Meyer, who I assume is not interested). We'll see, I guess.
https://www.si.com/2014/11/04/nfl-greg-schiano-year-off
Micromanaging doesn't work in business
Like, do you really care as a fan if he’s a control freak? Check out his record for his last few years at RU. He was onto big big things, but he got an offer that was hard to pass up (ok, ok that he couldn’t refuse). He belongs here at RU. I have no doubt whatsoever that he will do a bang up job and he’ll be here for a long time.
Says a university professor?
You really could not be more wrong. See my thread about the type of person/employee who the frequent complainers about micromanaging.
have first-hand experience with micromanagers, both inside and outside academe. They are generally impossible to reason with even when they are screwing up. They think they're right all the time, even about things they know nothing about.
If Schiano is hired and that's a mighty big if:After Tennessee, Greg is damaged goods, and right now, so are we. For better or worse, we are a pretty good match for one another right now.
As for micromanaging... Unless we are willing to pay for coordinators with experience at this level, I’d expect micromanaging. If we hire the two Camps, as coordinators I doubt we’ll see much delegation.
I don't think the boosters should have any say, and they shouldn't be listened to, unless it's all about the money, which it
should not be.
wrongMicromanaging doesn't work in business and it doesn't work in sports. All it does is demoralize those who work for the micromanager. I'm worried if Schiano hasn't changed about that.
After watching this train wreck of a program who would worry about post respectability longevity - just weird.I have no doubt that Schiano would get us back to respectability, but once he plateaus he will be impossible to remove for the next coach to take us to the next level.
Track and Field won a big east championship during that time frame. Wouldn't consider that dying in the vineThat had zero to do with Schiano
Dead on! Anyone on this board who diminishes the possibility of a Schiano hire because he may not be able to get us to the level of OSU is totally clueless - not unexpected from the dopes posting here.Don’t care if he’s a micromanager. Just wanna see a competitive RU team on the field again, with all the good vibes, anticipation and pride that comes with it.
I have no doubt that Schiano would get us back to respectability, but once he plateaus he will be impossible to remove for the next coach to take us to the next level.