"Are More New Jersey Colleges Doomed to Collapse?"

srru86

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
Jul 25, 2001
17,655
3,915
113
Yes, the long term demographic decline of traditional college aged people is the underlying macro problem.

The extra Jersey centric wrinkle is for decades, from the late 80's to the Christie college bonds, the State invested zero dollars in capital spending for public colleges. All the building done over that period was borrowed money on the College's, not the State's, balance sheet. While almost all States divested from spending on public higher ed over that period, NJ is close to the front of the pack. Most NJ publics have a lot of borrowed money hanging over them making debt servicing a significant portion of the annual operating budgets.

NJCU is the worst example.

Not addressing the small privates. I won't say I don't care, but a certain Darwinian culling might be in order. We are seeing some of that already.

All that being said, Rutgers won't be unaffected, but we can weather the storm better than most.
 

NotInRHouse

Legend
Oct 17, 2007
67,210
45,147
113
For some reason it's saying subscriber exclusive for me. I do see the first 3 schools mentioned though.

I do get why a school like Rider is suffering...the pricetag isn't justifiable. Hell, outside of Princeton, and perhaps Stevens with a scholarship, which NJ private schools are?

I don't get why Willy P and NJCU are having the issues they are- are there just less people going to college?

I guess there is some argument for some merger of the "lesser" NJ schools. NJCU has an important role but could it be part of the administration of Montclair or somewhere else? I know a lot schools would love that piece of real estate alone...
 

retired711

Heisman Winner
Nov 20, 2001
16,520
7,093
113
71
Cherry Hill
Yes, the long term demographic decline of traditional college aged people is the underlying macro problem.

The extra Jersey centric wrinkle is for decades, from the late 80's to the Christie college bonds, the State invested zero dollars in capital spending for public colleges. All the building done over that period was borrowed money on the College's, not the State's, balance sheet. While almost all States divested from spending on public higher ed over that period, NJ is close to the front of the pack. Most NJ publics have a lot of borrowed money hanging over them making debt servicing a significant portion of the annual operating budgets.

NJCU is the worst example.

Not addressing the small privates. I won't say I don't care, but a certain Darwinian culling might be in order. We are seeing some of that already.

All that being said, Rutgers won't be unaffected, but we can weather the storm better than most.
I don't think you're right. Rutgers issues bonds to construct dorms. But these are revenue bonds that are paid off through room and board charges. I wouldn't worry about them unless there's a massive (and I mean massive) collapse in the number of kids living in the dorms. Rutgers does not issue bonds to construct classroom buildings. That's why it was so important a few years ago that New Jersey's voters approved a bond issue for construction. Those are state bonds, not Rutgers bonds -- servicing them is the state's problem, not Rutgers'. Rutgers does have a revenue problem, but it's an operating budget problem; the state legislature does not appropriate enough money each year to support Rutgers adequately. So the institution has to either cut back or raise tuition -- an unattractive choice.
 

bigmatt718

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
Mar 11, 2013
11,490
13,702
113
Philadelphia, PA
Rider might be in big trouble in a decade or even less. Would Rutgers absorb them as a satellite campus or maybe TCNJ would?