Cabinda Bell Sickles Penn State
- Thread starter FELONIOUSMONK
- Start date
Howard says hi.
Not only have you been maxed out, you're also clueless. This thread is highly entertaining. Purdue, eh?
Austin Johnson was a dominant college football player and 2nd-round draft pick in the NFL. Darius Hamilton doesn't belong in the same sentence.
Strength of schedule, according to Sagarin:
2014: Rutgers 52, Penn State 62
2015: Rutgers 50, Penn State 48
2016: Rutgers 14, Penn State 17
I know you're melting, but stop reaching. Hamilton just hasn't been great, and certainly not an elite player one might expect of a 5-star recruit. And that's OK. You don't lose the right to support Rutgers if you come to terms with that.
What does it say at the top of this page? You know, the one in the red with the white lettering.
Are you really this stupid? Never got that vibe until I read this.
How hard is it to take a hint? Apparently harder than I thought.
My goodness you and CNJ are angry, ya'll want to meet up for a beer on Nov 19th and see that Penn Staters in real life (not behind a keyboard) are actually awesome people. I'll buy the first round, any takers?
Pitt's a good football team man, and Temple>New Mexico. It's really not that hard to understand at all
I'm not commenting on who was or wasn't a bust because that is pretty subjective and in a lot of cases probably is not fair to the kids we're talking about. But when you specifically say,
and there are actual metrics published by various sites related to strength of schedule and then the SOS is pretty similar it's hard to not discount the other positions you take. If you want to go through each game log and say player X feasted on the weak teams compared to player Y have at it. @Cheesesteak Vegas posted Saragin's, here are couple more sites.
From Sports Reference (http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/):
2012 PSU 0.53; RU -2.55
2013 PSU 1.07; RU -3.37
2014 PSU 1.54; RU 2.50
2015 PSU 4.77; RU 3.1
2016 PSU 27.41; RU 24.71
From Football Outsiders (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa)
2012 PSU 0.04; RU -1.04
2013 PSU -0.05; RU -0.66
2014 PSU 0.78; RU 0.43
2015 PSU 1.3; RU -0.20
2016 no data yet
I'm not sure if Sports Reference changed their rating system for 2016 or if it is just because the season is ongoing but I don't think either of our schedules are an order of magnitude harder than previous years. Regardless, the point is there's not a whole lot of difference.
Wow, that's a rather painful thing for a Pedd State fan to say.
Not at all, they won and have a good senior loaded team. Take nothing away from them.
They won this year, oh well. It's not painful to say because we play them the next 3 years and should beat them moving forward. PSU fans are excited for this year yes but next year they could challenge for a big ten title, legitimately.
I've been respectful but the way you post with the pedd state jokes allow me to realize ur simply a misrable person and in that sense I can understand why you would think a penn state fan would be upset after losing to Pitt, but we know that in future years this team will smoke them so it's quite alright. As a Rutgers fan I would still be pissed about 2014, that year was truly your best and most likely only shot of beating penn state for the next 5 years at least. Be bitter about that loss, I don't take much pride in other teams' fans sorrow because I've been there many times, but your just awful guy.
I have read thru this entire thread, and must say you are one NASTY person. The Penn State posters in this thread have been nothing but "respectful", you just don't like their opinions. Last time I looked this site was free, and open to ALL football fans. If you don't like it then go on the Rivals premium site to follow your team.
Show me where e5fdny was nasty.
Just telling Nits they should take their thoughts elsewhere is an opinion and he has every right to post that just like those Nits have every right to post on this free board.
But visitors should take into consideration that this is a Rutgers board and some RU fans will get offended if they see a post on here by a Penn St fan that looks like it could be knocking a Rutgers player.
If I missed one or more of e5fdny's replies that could be considered nasty , let me know because he only seems to be mad at what he considers Nits knocking Rutgers on a Rutgers board.
Last edited:
And to think I once believed that no one should be banned from this site.
Go to any friggin Rivals board and identify as a fan of an opponent and opine that one of the top players on their team is a bust. You think there are any where you won't be quickly denied the ability to post on that board again ?
I wonder why that would be ?
and BTW, the Pedd St. board would be the quickest to blacklist you if you did something like that on their board.
That for me also.
GSGS and some other one I can't recall should probably be on watch lists though because even in type they come across as legit psychopaths.
This is definitely a fun message board and you can see the loyalty and also the funny stuff or helpful stuff is always good. Personality is good and it is always solid here.
Yes until it starts snowing...Take a trip to Chapel Hill or the Dook campus...Penn State is JoePa and football tradition as the key seller-now marred by pedophila. All the successes of your Penn States, BCs (wasn't even considered a highly thought of school until Flutie), Vllanovas is because those who run and work at Rutgers haven't done there jobs (and frankly most hires are who you know/political).
Nothing that Pedd State does in football will ever again be legitimate. Anybody with any morals knows that your football program should have been shut down following what Sports Illustrated labeled the biggest scandal in the history of college sports. Instead, not only did you guys not take your puny punishment from the NCAA and thank your lucky stars for the pass you were given, you sued them to get the vacated victories restored.
Your new motto should be: "Penn State football, honoring pedophilia, one molested 10 year old at a time."
Wow, I think I triggered the moron. Do you use this board as your safe space to use the Sandusky scandal as a coping mechanism for the fact that RU can't beat penn state in a football game?
If you want to keep harping on about Sandusky 5 years after that fact, we'll have at it, but please know that especially if you are over 30 years of age, that you are the biggest loser in life skankhunt42
Nah. I think GSGS is just very sensitive about serial child abusers and their enablers.
He's funny like that.
And BTW, at this time I'd like to thank Pedd St. for being responsible for serial child abuse entering the conversation about college football.
I get it.
24 is the number of victims of Jerry Sandusky ?
2 is the number of seconds JoePa thought about those kids being victimized before he went back to game-planning for the next team Pedd St. was scheduled to play ?
I don't care about us owning you on the football field. I do care about fakes that pretty much every spoken or written word isn't close to factually correct or even relevant to the topic. He is supposed to be doing it to promote you guys? He just makes everyone cringe. Even PEDD ENABLERS(so witty).
The two are easy to identify.
No logic at all. I know a lot of you have Thing1 on ignore but Thing2 is almost as bad.
The two are easy to identify.
No logic at all. I know a lot of you have Thing1 on ignore but Thing2 is almost as bad.
I have a simple solution to all this. Stop the multiple PSU threads on the free board.
I know Rutgers fans hate Penn State and hate when PSU fans come over to your message board. But when there are multiple threads about PSU and their players, it's naturally going to attract lurkers who will eventually comment.
I know Rutgers fans hate Penn State and hate when PSU fans come over to your message board. But when there are multiple threads about PSU and their players, it's naturally going to attract lurkers who will eventually comment.
I do agree that the Rutgers fans who start the posts on Pedd State are in effect enabling (LOL) the lurkers. That said, how pathetic is it that you have nothing else to do on a Sat night but to spend it on a Rutgers football msg board where you're not welcome. That certainly does away with your argument that Rutgers football isn't relevant.
I wasn't here on a Saturday night. I go to a few message boards Sunday morning while I'm relaxing because I love college football.
I've been following this board for about 5 years and no board poster has a higher ratio of "pedo" jokes/comments than this poster...I'm glad he isn't representative of the greater Rutgers football supporters...I'm just wondering if he has some personal history with this type of thing and that's why he is so "sensitive"...no wait he isn't "sensitive" he makes a mockery of it which is not sensitive at all to the real child victims
He makes me sick. It literally takes a few minutes to view a message board. So no wasted Saturday. Some of us have friends that go to or have went to Rutgers.
And one guy constantly embarrasses your entire board or should. How anyone with a human bone in them says that stuff...it doesn't even make sense unless they are very mentally ill and are given a free pass for it.
And one guy constantly embarrasses your entire board or should. How anyone with a human bone in them says that stuff...it doesn't even make sense unless they are very mentally ill and are given a free pass for it.
Most people aren't actually insane and a lot are actually enjoyable.
This is a RUTGERS FREE BOARD NOT A PED STATE FREE BOARD.....I know interbreeding in Central PA over many generations has caused you to lose many a brain cell and as a result have had you thinking Paterno didn't know and that it's a conspiracy against Jerry Sandusky. But please leave this board. You guys are awful.
If Honest Don The Pussy Grabber becomes President I'll be headed north.
I figured I'd work on the lingo.....just in case.
Similar threads
