Some of them are idiots but I'm pretty skeptical this even works on them. Pitt is going to recruit people by pointing to how many people Duke puts in the NBA? Because it's the "ACC"?
Also, most recent draft:
Big Ten 9
SEC 8
ACC 7
P12 6
B12 4
BE 3
WCC 2
If I had an NBA ready kid I sure wouldn't send him to Kansas. He has more than twice as good a shot in the Big Ten!
2021 Draft
SEC 12
B10/ACC/B12 7
P12/BE 4
Send the kids to Georgia!
When it comes to the mechanics of scouting, building draft boards, and a team moving their pieces on/off and up/down accordingly, the more tape you have against NBA players the better off you are without question.Conferences don’t put players in the NBA over others - that’s just silly. The biggest advantage (perhaps only advantage outside of NIL) of choosing a brand name like Duke as a top incoming recruit is mitigating the downside risk of not getting drafted if you don’t have an impactful frosh year. A Jaden Jones type season at Rutgers (even as a top 30 recruit) probably wipes you out of draft contention until you prove yourself at the collegiate level. At Kentucky or Duke, you were sitting behind other 5 stars so you might still be drafted based on potential even without ever being an impact college player.
That is just how the process works.
All you have to do is anecdotally recall the mods posts about scouts at the RAC aligning with TJD playing here to see a small cog in the machine to understand how the players accumulate exposure and in turn gain the confidence of a scout to bang the table for them.
Contrary to popular belief scouts (in both football and basketball) are NOT watching most of these kids games.