Rutgers women win Big Ten championships, but lose out to men on athletics spending
What a joke. The writer, a Columbia Journalism grad fails to understand that football is the engine that funds other sports, and you have to spend money to make money. Is she implying the women's team coaches should be paid as much as the football coach?
And here is what the women's soccer coach had to say, which should be the end of story:
"Mike O’Neill, the Rutgers women’s head soccer coach, said he felt the program has been supported “really, really well.” When asked about the significant investments in football compared to soccer, he said it was important for all sports to do well on campus.
“It’s so important that football does well, and we all understand that and we’re behind that,” he said. “But when it comes to our individual sport, we feel we get great support. We feel we have some of the top facilities in the country.”"
Rutgers women win Big Ten championships, but lose out to men on athletics spending
Rutgers women's soccer and field hockey won Big Ten titles, but spending in many categories, from recruiting to coaching salaries to travel, favor men.
www.app.com
EDIT:
New Article today (9/9) behind paywall. They never stop. The person tweeting the articles is President of the Union of graduate workers, faculty, postdocs and EOF counsellors at Rutgers
Last edited: