Is that because they are all playing worse football than we are?Maryland, Indiana, Illinois and Purdue are the doormats. RU is one small step above.
Maryland, Indiana, Illinois and Purdue are the doormats. RU is one small step above.
Last year we were on the same level as northwestern , pen state and Michigan... How fast things change
Rutgers is no where near the top level talent. But it is solidly within the logjam of the middle pack Big 10 teams. Rutgers, indiana, illinois, Minnesota, northwestern, maryland, recently seems Nebraska is in this group, and most years Iowa too. Those teams will shuffle year to year. Indiana is only one consistently at bottom. Rutgers will fairly consistently fluctuate between 5-7 and
7-5 until someone comes in and does something radical to take us to next level.
When was the last time Purdue won 8 games like we did last year?
Northwestern, PSU, and UM were on the same level as Rutgers last year. Some things changed. Others have not.Last year we were on the same level as northwestern , pen state and Michigan... How fast things change
See post about the Massey ratings. I didn't say we are having a good year this year. The ratings support my statement. It is so supported by the fact the elite teams destroy us, but we are competitive with the others. I said we were far from the elites. Worrying that we are a doormat (which implies to me consistently last place over time) is way to premature.um wrong...Iowa? Northwestern? sorry but they are in another tier. Rutgers sits with the bottom feeders, did you miss our game against Indiana, we won in the last minute in a horribly played game..two bad teams just about even. Nebraska may temporarily be down but its not even close here they will move back up
reality is that RU fans have ALWAYS overrated our placement in whatever league we were in. Talent wise we can win games in the Big 10 but not with this coaching staff
Purdue put up 55 points to beat Nebraska today.
Who here really believes that we can put up 55 points against Nebraska?
My original prediction for this season after the WSU loss still stands: We beat Army. We have about half a chance of beating Maryland. That's it, folks. Five wins, max.
...and Maryland put up plenty of yardage and points against PSU and OSU. 2 things we came nowhere close to doing.
I think it's more accurate to say that Fludd didn't take advantage of the recruiting bump. GS left him a top 25 class, excitement and expectations were high...Fludd actually put together a very solid class after that but then the games began...that class fell apart and it's been downhill every since. The excitement was there, the Fludd hiring squandered it. I blame Pernetti for that just as much as Fludd.I don't believe we have the talent to open up the play book and this makes us predictable. But instead of talking about what's wrong I want to talk about what might turn things around. We need the university, state whomever to open up the wallet and hire a decent HC and Assistants. Then we need to recruit a little better. We honestly did not get the recruiting bump we expected after joining the B10.
Five wins? That is wildly optimistic after the last two games. Rutgers would be demolished by Temple and UConn this season. Three wins this year, and that is it. And yet Flood will be retained. Somehow.Purdue put up 55 points to beat Nebraska today.
Who here really believes that we can put up 55 points against Nebraska?
My original prediction for this season after the WSU loss still stands: We beat Army. We have about half a chance of beating Maryland. That's it, folks. Five wins, max.
Five wins? That is wildly optimistic after the last two games. Rutgers would be demolished by Temple and UConn this season. Three wins this year, and that is it. And yet Flood will be retained. Somehow.
you lost any credibility when you said UCONN would demolish us.
This year mirrors last year....big losses to the top teams and competitive against everyone else. Let's not forget the MSU game. I'm very curious to see how the team responds next week with Caroo back and a home game against a struggling Nebraska team. If they win, a bowl bid and 6 wins should come down to the home finale against Maryland.
That's NOT doormat status.
u need to take ur ball and go home. we suck.
We arent talking about the past. We are talking about 2015. The Doormat moniker is a great fit for Kyle Flood's squadHere is the average Massey Rank for Big Ten programs from 2012 to 2014:
7 Ohio State
16 Michigan State
21 Wisconsin
27 Nebraska
41 Michigan
46 Penn State
52 Minnesota
54 Northwestern
55 Iowa
61 Rutgers
72 Maryland
78 Indiana
89 Illinois
92 Purdue
We're between the mediocre middle and the real doormats. What a great place to be.
I'll help. We do suck right now.great analysis......"we suck". Did you need some help with that ? Here's my guess, You could fit your football knowledge into a thimble....
I think many of your are insulting the doormat industry. I think we're closer RIGHT NOW to the crap left ON the doormat after one scrapes its shoe.We arent talking about the past. We are talking about 2015. The Doormat moniker is a great fit for Kyle Flood's squad
I'll help. We do suck right now.
let me ask....did you say the say thing last year after the 3 game stretch against OSU, Nebraska and Wisconsin?
The team is struggling with the youngest secondary in the entire country and Flood is not the answer because he stubbornly sticks with Laviano.
Maryland, Indiana, Illinois and Purdue are the doormats. RU is one small step above.
You are predicating all of this on an "IF" are you not?you lost any credibility when you said UCONN would demolish us.
This year mirrors last year....big losses to the top teams and competitive against everyone else. Let's not forget the MSU game. I'm very curious to see how the team responds next week with Caroo back and a home game against a struggling Nebraska team. If they win, a bowl bid and 6 wins should come down to the home finale against Maryland.
That's NOT doormat status.