See, I would interpret the facts a little differently. Danny thought Rutgers was desperate and tried to use more leverage than he had. Hobbs (appropriately) walked away.Dude what are you talking about? He asked for too much? He wanted a 7 year deal at $2M-ish. The next year he got $2.75M for 6 years. He was worthy of the deal - clearly.
And I didn’t say “Hobbs didn’t get it done”. I said Hobbs didn’t like the deal. To which you agree with! I didn’t say anyone else as upset he didn’t do the deal.
I honestly have no idea what you’re doing in this conversation other than to say yeah sojo you’re right Hobbs didn’t want to do the deal - he asked for more money and years than Hobbs wanted to give him.
The only thing wrong is your exaggeration that he tried to bend RU over with a ridiculous ask. He proved in the market he was worth what asked plus some and it worked out for another team. There is nothing wrong with any of this lol
Lmao you guys are impossible.See, I would interpret the facts a little differently. Danny thought Rutgers was desperate and tried to use more leverage than he had. Hobbs (appropriately) walked away.
A year later, largely because of football and conference situations, UConn was desperate. And Danny was able to use that desperation to leverage a deal that was above his typical market worth.
Nothing wrong with doing that, just who he is.
I'm not impossible. I just don't like Dan Hurley.Lmao you guys are impossible.
Danny turned down pitt and Memphis (iirc) who also offered similar deals.
That’s fine but don’t make things upI'm not impossible. I just don't like Dan Hurley.
That’s fine but don’t make things up
Would like to know one thing I’ve made up out of thin air before, according to you.this coming from RUsojo (considering his posting history).
LOL
Would like to know one thing I’ve made up out of thin air before, according to you.
True it was two years not one I got that wrong.your history of baised/ slanted posting is well established. I dont save your posts for future reference. I'll refer to your lies in this thread.....
you comparing the money he got at UConn to the situation with RU is more revisionist history ("You said he was bending RU over financially. He wasn’t. It’s proven by what he got in the market"
firstly, it wasnt 1 year later it was 2 years. When RU was dealing with him it was off a very mediocre 17-15 record.
he then proceeded to put together two consecutive 25 win seasons which included a conf. championship, two NCAA appearances and a two NCAA wins. needless-to-say the market for Hurley was much hotter in the two years after his dealings with RU.
apples-to-oranges to say the least.
but dont let facts get in the way.
True it was two years not one I got that wrong.
He talked to Rutgers after his 4th season iirc at Rhode Island but had already taken them from bottom of the conference (second bottom maybe) to 2nd in the conference and 23 win season by year 3. He wasn’t unproven.
He was still a hot commodity and on his way to stardom. Let’s remember the market for a successful A10 coach was HOT at this time as same Shaka Smart just cashed in on a monster deal after finishing below Hurley (longer resume obviously no argument here) and Archie Miller and Will Wade (VCU again) cashed in a year later and then Hurley followed.
Shaka got the 7 years I think (might’ve been 6) almost $3M.
Wade got 6 years $2.5M after two seasons.
Archie Miller got 8 years $3.3M
Big difference OBVIOUSLY was he hadn’t got to the tournament yet (bubble 2015 iirc) but projected to breakthrough. Splitting hairs but certainly a big deal when it comes to contract negotiations:
When Rutgers hired Pike I think he got 5 years and near $1.5M.
When it comes to not liking the Hurley deal, it wasn’t that Hurley was asking for too much, it Rutgers was not willing to commit to big spending at that time. Nothing to do with Hurley asking for too much.
Everything you’re saying equates to exactly what I said in the first post - Hobbs didn’t like the deal.wow. seriously?
I distinctly remember when RU was dealing with Hurley. I distinctly remember that the prevailing attitude was that he was asking too much. that his resume AT THAT TIME was not really that impressive (and certainly not worthy of what he was asking for AT THAT TIME). Thus, as I stated previously, I also distinctly remember people not being surprised or upset that he was sent packing.
you trying to compare him (AT THAT TIME) to other coaches (Shaka and Archie) with much more impressive resumes AT THAT TIME is simply ridiculous and disingenuous, as is comparing Hurley's worth at the time RU was dealing with him to his worth 2 years later. apples-to-oranges all around.
we have all seen how a coach can blow up - Hurley did that in his 2 years AFTER his dealing with RU. you can't apply his worth then to a discussion about what happened with RU two years prior. I cant believe that I even need to explain this to you.
In reality he was willing to take the risk on RU for less money than he ultimately got.
but dont let facts get in the way.
He bargained at what he believed his future value was. Legitimate to do, but it was not based on his actual accomplishments to date.Everything you’re saying equates to exactly what I said in the first post - Hobbs didn’t like the deal.
I am saying AT THAT TIME I don’t think he was asking for too much, given his resume and what P5 teams were paying/paid successful A10 coaches.
That was proven to be true imo. All these things are true yet you’re arguing something.
Guy had went near worst to first in a competitive A10 conference, had a preseason top 25 team, and a historically bad team 200+ in Kenpom and a mockery of the entire country, not just college basketball fans, wanted him but didn’t want to do a 7 yr $2M+ deal.
That’s not bending RU over. In reality he was willing to take the risk on RU for less money than he ultimately got.
I guess If you want to say that part of making a good deal is ignoring the marketplace trends than that’s another discussion that can be had. I feel like that’s what your actual point is?
Damn good game tonight with two very good teams. Where are they ranked at this point? Who knows? It’s so early, but both teams can do some damage in the tournament.Gotta say, he has done very well. Well balanced.
#2Damn good game tonight with two very good teams. Where are they ranked at this point? Who knows? It’s so early, but both teams can do some damage in the tournament.
I meant that you could basically shuffle the top 10 at this point since there will always be upsets and hiccups this early. But UCONN looks pretty legit as does Nova even though they will have to make up some ground.
Do we really need more tongues on UConn. It's a Rutgers boardGotta say, he has done very well. Well balanced.
Thank goodness.Let’s not get carried away here, he took over a blue chip brand 5 years removed from a national championship and 3 years removed from making the tourney.
To me, he’ll always be the guy who didn’t have the confidence in himself to do in 7 years what Pike did in 4.
Agreed, he got in a shouting match with fans post-game last year after a loss - then yelled into the stands trying to challenge them again after the next winhe's very unlikeable
And there’s literally already a goddamn thread on themDo we really need more tongues on UConn. It's a Rutgers board
It was a good game tonight. Having a thread on it is fine.And there’s literally already a goddamn thread on them
Well saidLet’s not get carried away here, he took over a blue chip brand 5 years removed from a national championship and 3 years removed from making the tourney.
To me, he’ll always be the guy who didn’t have the confidence in himself to do in 7 years what Pike did in 4.
3 of the top 10 threads about UCONN is too much. Yes, Hurley is a good coach. Obsessing about it when we have our own good coach and program is smallOh good, more UConn spam.
Dan was a part of the mess here at Rutgers. Don't recall him being the voice for cleaning up after Bannon.Dan Hurley quit coaching basketball in 2001, stating, "things weren’t going right at Rutgers."
He dropped down to the high school level, promptly turning St. Benedict's in Newark into a national powerhouse. Then, Dan returned to the college level at Wagner. Dan inherited a 5-26 team, going 13-17 in year one and 25-6 team.
Dan jumped to Rhode Island, not even the biggest basketball program in a tiny state. At Rhode Island, Dan got a 7-24 team and in his final two years there, went 25-10 and 26-8, winning NCAA games in both years. In fact, in a 365 day period, Dan won more NCAA games at Rhode Island than Steve Pikiell has won in 17 years as a Division I head coach.
At Connecticut, Dan inherited not only a losing team (14-18) but a program on probation. As of tonight, Dan-led UConn is 14-0.
To be sure, I am a big Steve Pikiell fan. He runs a super program. Everything is going right. Progression on the court, super program culture, great atmosphere in the RAC. And Steve snagged a 4* recruit from Connecticut to headline the 2023 class. Even got me to come out for a game at the RAC for the first time in years - and I travelled from out of state during a bomb cyclone.
But one cannot keep from wondering what could've been if Dan had stuck around Rutgers in 2001.
LOL, this argument is almost as sad as the kindergarten-level insult in the thread title. UConn is 15-0 and doesn't care what a few jealous Rutgers fans think about them. We have a good team, no doubt, but are currently nowhere near the level of the University of Connecticut Huskies.UConn doesn’t pass the eye test for me.
Cool your Jets! The last two years in the NCAA’s, UConn has been a putrid embarrassment.LOL, this argument is almost as sad as the kindergarten-level insult in the thread title. UConn is 15-0 and doesn't care what a few jealous Rutgers fans think about them. We have a good team, no doubt, but are currently nowhere near the level of the University of Connecticut Huskies.