All the regular students that are going out of state for college in the next few years. Going to miss the rebirth of Rutgers football with 200K in debt
Buy stock now!!!!
Buy stock now!!!!
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think a kid should just pick a school because they have a successful football or athletics program in general, but it does get the name out there. It is not a coincidence that more and more kids from the North, especially boys, are interested in SEC schools ( plus Clemson). When you go to the other extreme, schools without any football, they often do turn into ghost towns on weekends in the Fall. My cousins son went to two schools without any football, Ramapo and Stockton, and he said there is nothing to keep the students there or bring alumni in on Fall weekends.
If people stick their nose up to an education from RU because of the football team, they're idiots. If they look down on an RU education relative to another schools education, that's their prerogative.The point was more that Rutgers should be a viable option for NJ kids when too many kids and parents in the state stick their nose up at RU.
My neighbor’s daughter was like that. Started at TCNJ and then switched to Rutgers for some of those reasons.There are plenty of kids that aren't sure what they want to study or even if college is right for them. So a fun sports atmosphere is appealing. It doesn't mean that's all they care about, but it is a factor
The Flutie effect is very real. I live in Massachusetts and lived in Natick ( his hometown) when Flutie was at BC. BC is a good academic institution but it's reputation rose when applications skyrocketed and it became more selective after Flutie's time there. I also take issue with the poster above who said football shouldn't be factor in college selection. Of course the #1 criteria should be academic excellence and fit of the institution. However, once you've graduated ( I'm RC '73), often your only real connection to your alma mater is through sports , especially football. My son graduated Washington University in St Louis , one of the best universities in the country. But I said to him when selecting his college that once you've graduated, you'll have little connection to the university other than through fundraising and infrequent alumni activities. And I've been proven right.Clemson and Villanova applications have gone out of the universe since their National Championships. Baylor Admissions staff will be getting VERY busy after last Monday. Half of the University of Alabama is now out of state students and it isn’t because they have a top notch Art History Department. The Flutie effect is real.
Mine wereMy four finalists were
Rutgers
Florida
Delaware
Temple
Those kids and parents don’t know what they’re talking about.The point was more that Rutgers should be a viable option for NJ kids when too many kids and parents in the state stick their nose up at RU.
You must have missed the JJ Seneca thread about 6 months ago.Should it be a major factor or factor at all ? No . But the truth is it is and it’s a major part of college life . Look at us making the basketball tournament and many people were reminiscing about when they were students 30 years ago and where they were . People talk about games they attended as students . I hardly hear anyone talking or reminiscing about the biology or precalc classes they took.
Yes, missedYou must have missed the JJ Seneca thread about 6 months ago.
From what I heard, 2021 fall applications to RU were the highest in school history. Just wait till football is fully revived.Applications to Rutgers have been surging for years and we will certainly get an extra bump from making the NCAA tournament.
Clemson and Villanova applications have gone out of the universe since their National Championships. Baylor Admissions staff will be getting VERY busy after last Monday. Half of the University of Alabama is now out of state students and it isn’t because they have a top notch Art History Department. The Flutie effect is real.
While I totally agree with your first paragraph I am not so sure on the bolded in the second. And just what I bolded:The evidence shows that the extra applications come from students who don't have the credentials to be admitted. Northwestern was an example the year they went to the Rose Bowl. So the additional applications are worthless to the school. Students value other factors much more than athletics -- @West Point Knight is an example.
There is, for better or worse, no evidence that success in sports has much to do with academic prowess, or with donations to the academic side of the institution. None of the schools you mention are particularly good; Alabama is a step below Auburn (in the same state) and U. Georgia (in a neighboring state)
I know kids who were planning on going to schools in the northeast who are now headed south. Kids want to be at schools that are open. You only do college onceHere’s hoping that the state of football at a school (any school) ...good or bad is not something used in making such a big decision.
I chose Rutgers because it has a kick-ass atmospheric science program. Prior to attending RU I had never even been to a HS football game; the interest in football started sophomore year.
I suspect that the motivation for the gift and the time of its announcement were two *very* separate things. A more helpful indication is years of data showing that the Clemsons and Baylors of this world do not attract extra donations as a result of athletic success. Worse, there is evidence that athletic scandals hurt all giving, including academic giving.While I totally agree with your first paragraph I am not so sure on the bolded in the second. And just what I bolded:
There is...no evidence that success in sports has much to do with...donations to...the institution.
Now granted I tweaked it a bit to suit my argument but I was in the banquet room in Houston at the Texas Bowl when Rutgers did get its biggest (at the time) donation to the academic side for cancer research. It could have been announced at any time but Rutgers and the benefactors chose to do it there while we were all there celebrating the success of the 2006 Football season.
The trend toward going to southern schools has been happening for years as these institutions improve and as the South becomes a more important part of the nation. It has nothing to do with the pandemic. Consider also that Rutgers has pledged to have normal classes this Fall, so being "open" should be playing little or no role in student decision-making.I know kids who were planning on going to schools in the northeast who are now headed south. Kids want to be at schools that are open. You only do college once
Again, not disagreeing with the last part.I suspect that the motivation for the gift and the time of its announcement were two *very* separate things. A more helpful indication is years of data showing that the Clemsons and Baylors of this world do not attract extra donations as a result of athletic success. Worse, there is evidence that athletic scandals hurt all giving, including academic giving.
I am a fan of Rutgers sports, and I think sports success helps bring the university community together. But there seems no evidence here, or elsewhere, that athletic success has much to do with a university's quality. If it did, the Ivy League schools would be considered mediocre academically, and of course they are not despite the not-great quality of their interscholastic athletics.
Your telling the kids who go to HS with kids, nieces, and nephews are being dishonest? I know these kids, I know where they were going to go and where they are now going. It’s 100% because of the pandemic.The trend toward going to southern schools has been happening for years as these institutions improve and as the South becomes a more important part of the nation. It has nothing to do with the pandemic. Consider also that Rutgers has pledged to have normal classes this Fall, so being "open" should be playing little or no role in student decision-making.
Yes it does.The trend toward going to southern schools has been happening for years as these institutions improve and as the South becomes a more important part of the nation. It has nothing to do with the pandemic. Consider also that Rutgers has pledged to have normal classes this Fall, so being "open" should be playing little or no role in student decision-making.
I suspect that the motivation for the gift and the time of its announcement were two *very* separate things. A more helpful indication is years of data showing that the Clemsons and Baylors of this world do not attract extra donations as a result of athletic success. Worse, there is evidence that athletic scandals hurt all giving, including academic giving.While I totally agree with your first paragraph I am not so sure on the bolded in the second. And just what I bolded:
There is...no evidence that success in sports has much to do with...donations to...the institution.
Now granted I tweaked it a bit to suit my argument but I was in the banquet room in Houston at the Texas Bowl when Rutgers did get its biggest (at the time) donation to the academic side for cancer research. It could have been announced at any time but Rutgers and the benefactors chose to do it there while we were all there celebrating the success of the 2006 Football season.
If they use a browser, they'll quickly learn that Rutgers will be open this Fall. If they can't, maybe it's just as well they're going south.Your telling the kids who go to HS with kids, nieces, and nephews are being dishonest? I know these kids, I know where they were going to go and where they are now going. It’s 100% because of the pandemic.
Why? Can't they use a browser and find out that Rutgers will be open this Fall?Yes it does.
As a parent of someone going thru the process and having friends who also have children going thru it, it is most certainly part of the conversation.
Where are these articles that say Rutgers will be 100% open and in person this year? Full capacity at football games and the RAC? Plus we already know they are requiring kids to get vaccinated. Not everyone wants to vaccinate their kids. We just pulled out of Cooperstown tourney this year because they want 12 year olds vaccinated.I suspect that the motivation for the gift and the time of its announcement were two *very* separate things. A more helpful indication is years of data showing that the Clemsons and Baylors of this world do not attract extra donations as a result of athletic success. Worse, there is evidence that athletic scandals hurt all giving, including academic giving.
I am a fan of Rutgers sports, and I think sports success helps bring the university community together. But there seems no evidence here, or elsewhere, that athletic success has much to do with a university's quality. If it did, the Ivy League schools would be considered mediocre academically, and of course they are not despite the not-great qua
If they use a browser, they'll quickly learn that Rutgers will be open this Fall. If they can't, maybe it's just as well they're going south.