Purdue lost to maryland by 43 and yea I think we beat them and we will have one year under our belt with this offensive system.
There is no way RU doesn't win 5 games with reasonable QB play (Gio improving and a 5th year added QB to make up for the expected departures of QB's that don't fit the system (Rettig grad transfer, Dare).
Maryland, Purdue, Eastern Michigan and Morgan State are 4 wins (unless Notre Dame fires Brian Kelly and he takes the Purdue job.
We have 5 locked losses (At Michigan, at Nebraska, at Penn State, Ohio State, Washington....Penn State is actually still sliding backwards, I would need to see more from them vs the giftwrapped special teams points the Buckeyes gave up last night
RU with staff tweaks can get to .500........it's still a very green and inexperienced staff and we need a former HC to come in and help stabilize either side of the ball (probably offense to help Mehringer)......if they bring back the same staff or don't add any consulting types for the offense, it drops to 4-8 to 5-7....I fully expect a 5th year QB next year to take the job, barring a huge jump from Gio in the last 4 games that looks close to what we got yesterday.
I prefer to call it tempering the enthusiasm. And, why we need it is because our fans want to fire first time head coaches after 3 losses because they think we are better than we are.Why can't some fans have a little optimism without you and bac shouting them down, the same thing you accused posters of doing last year. The constant drum beat of negativity is sad around here. Have your own opinion of things, but for some of you guys to accuse the more positive-minded fans of not being realistic or living in a fantasy gets old.
BTW, Nebraska loses their offensive juggernaut in QB Armstrong and RB Terrell Newby, so I would not automatically pencil that in for a LOSS. More like a TOSSUP to me.
Why can't some fans have a little optimism without you and bac shouting them down, the same thing you accused posters of doing last year.
And Maryland got killed by Minnesota and Maryland beat up MSU. So we should beat MSU by 80. Oh yea, it doesn't work that way.Purdue lost to maryland by 43 and yea I think we beat them and we will have one year under our belt with this offensive system.
Why can't some fans have a little optimism without you and bac shouting them down, the same thing you accused posters of doing last year. The constant drum beat of negativity is sad around here. Have your own opinion of things, but for some of you guys to accuse the more positive-minded fans of not being realistic or living in a fantasy gets old.
BTW, Nebraska loses their offensive juggernaut in QB Armstrong and RB Terrell Newby, so I would not automatically pencil that in for a LOSS. More like a TOSSUP to me.
And Maryland got killed by Minnesota and Maryland beat up MSU. So we should beat MSU by 80. Oh yea, it doesn't work that way.
first of all I dont understand your first line thats mixed up....it was fantasyland Flood worshippers ignoring poor recruiting and poor development that were insufferable here because they were being overly optimistic with their rosy scenerios, same thing happening here. Difference is Ash is a real coach and leader unlike Flood and he is going to move things in the right direction but slow down, the same people saying we are going 6-6 or better were the same people thinking we could be .500 this year, the same people splitting their wrists because of the Washington loss.
The reality is RU has zero conference wins this year. You can be cute and put Nebby into the tossup pile but that doesnt mean they are going to win it. RU will be underdogs in every game from here on out and if they cant knock off Indiana IMO they are headed toward a winless conference season. How can anyone pencil a win in over Illinois when they just beat us at home this year . Purdue will be our best shot at a conference win and I think they do win that one but remember Purdue knocked off Illinois. Newsflash I know no one wants to admit here but based on results Rutgers is the WORST team in the Big 10...thats based on results. Thats fact and not opinion.
I saw major progress on Saturday. However the sample size is small. Progress needs to be shown the rest of the way out and IMO its a little too early to project bowl expectations on a program that is winless in league this year.
The problem is that we get people with woefully unrealistic expectations, who then become miserable during the season when the team and staff is somehow a "failure" for meeting their ridiculous predictions.
I actually think most of the miserable people on here had no expectations. They just are simply miserable people.The problem is that we get people with woefully unrealistic expectations, who then become miserable during the season when the team and staff is somehow a "failure" for meeting their ridiculous predictions.
Interesting to think what RU record would be now if Gio was qb in Iowa and ILL games. The vibe on our board would be quite different with two more wins and two less losses. The pessimists would be more optimistic and the optimists would have us in the conference champ game next season. Lol. 2-3 more wins this season will catapult RU into the off season.
GO RU
Please.
Stop wth the "We are in big trouble next year"
Play makers abound ( Amir Mitchell, Belton, Harris, Grant - hopefully, TE Flannagn, RB Martin & Hicks, Gio), a seasoned secondary and a DL with Wilkins,Joseph, Turay, Nash, Bateky, etc. Six Wins is most likely the low point next year.
For what it's worth, I actually thought his projection was perfectly reasonable and not particularly pessimistic. One, good IMO, reason to challenge overly optimistic viewpoints about the team is that if people took a more realistic viewpoint, there might be a bit less of the constant negative commentary about the players, the coaches, etc., when we are not playing well.Why can't some fans have a little optimism without you and bac shouting them down, the same thing you accused posters of doing last year. The constant drum beat of negativity is sad around here. Have your own opinion of things, but for some of you guys to accuse the more positive-minded fans of not being realistic or living in a fantasy gets old.
BTW, Nebraska loses their offensive juggernaut in QB Armstrong and RB Terrell Newby, so I would not automatically pencil that in for a LOSS. More like a TOSSUP to me.
I actually think most of the miserable people on here had no expectations. They just are simply miserable people.
Nope, I predicted 6 wins. I expected to beat Iowa and Minnesota(felt both were overrated and they are)Came pretty close too.Yup. I'd bet that the majority who picked us to win 6-8 games this year, almost to a man and woman, were convinced that Flood's recruiting classes were highly underrated and that Ash took over a roster full of talent. They want to be able to say "ha ha ha" when Ash doesn't win, HOWEVER, will keep the lofty expectations up at the same time.
How is Maryland (or even Purdue) a lock? I get some posters are tired of negativity, but how can anyone act like Maryland is not at best a toss up?
2019, 2020.Just over 1/2 way through this season and people are already arguing over how many wins we get next year. Some of you guys are freaking amazing. Any predictions for when we win our 1st B1G or National Championship?
No. I stopped supporting Flood as soon as the academic scandal broke. And yes, a bowl wasn't unrealistic. Even with certain aspects being worse than I expected a bowl was still reasonable. I just responded to nuts with a breakdown. I expressed to beat both Iowa and Minnesota(knew both were overrated). Expected to beat Illinois. Would only have needed one of the three winnable games left. Hell, I'll piss you off a little bit more. We could still go bowling. Win 3 of 4 and we could get a bowl with 5 wins. There isn't a team left significantly better than Minnesota on our schedule.well you kept insisting we were going to a bowl this year....I asked you after the Michigan annihilation and you said yes....still feel that way and what were you basing your opinions on? You were a big fan of Flood werent you?
Nope, I predicted 6 wins. I expected to beat Iowa and Minnesota(felt both were overrated and they are)Came pretty close too.
Assumed we would beat Illinois. That would be five.
Only needed one of Indiana, Maryland, and PSU.
Really not that unrealistic.
You've said it yourself, Laviano left 21 points on the board against Iowa. You can never assume 5 TO's or dreadful special teams. I'm not even talking coverage. You should be able to kick a ball to a spot in hopes of a fair catch.
No. I stopped supporting Flood as soon as the academic scandal broke. And yes, a bowl wasn't unrealistic. Even with certain aspects being worse than I expected a bowl was still reasonable. I just responded to nuts with a breakdown. I expressed to beat both Iowa and Minnesota(knew both were overrated). Expected to beat Illinois. Would only have needed one of the three winnable games left. Hell, I'll piss you off a little bit more. We could still go bowling. Win 3 of 4 and we could get a bowl with 5 wins. There isn't a team left significantly better than Minnesota on our schedule.
I expected it because I actually watch football. I knew Iowa was a product of their schedule last year. I also knew their Offense would suck. I knew Minnesota wouldn't be as good because they were mostly a product of Kill's genius. Watch them plummet real quick real soon. Let's be honest, what did you predict the score of those two games to be? Who was closer to being right?I do not know how you expect to beat Iowa a team coming off of an outstanding year even with their losses. Thats not a game where its wise to EXPECT a victory..ditto for Minnesota, were you not paying attention to our team last year, I see you seem to fall in love with 2 stars from Flood and project a bowl season..thats a head scratcher
Just over 1/2 way through this season and people are already arguing over how many wins we get next year. Some of you guys are freaking amazing. Any predictions for when we win our 1st B1G or National Championship?
I expected it because I actually watch football. I knew Iowa was a product of their schedule last year. I also knew their Offense would suck. I knew Minnesota wouldn't be as good because they were mostly a product of Kill's genius. Watch them plummet real quick real soon. Let's be honest, what did you predict the score of those two games to be? Who was closer to being right?
Exactly right. I think some fans have tunnel vision when they think about this stuff. Their logic being, if we just do this, that and the other thing, we should beat team A, team B, and team C no problem. But that logic completely ignores the fact that teams A, B, and C are also trying their best to improve and might even improve faster than us.How is Maryland (or even Purdue) a lock? I get some posters are tired of negativity, but how can anyone act like Maryland is not at best a toss up?
Exactly right. I think some fans have tunnel vision when they think about this stuff. Their logic being, if we just do this, that and the other thing, we should beat team A, team B, and team C no problem. But that logic completely ignores the fact that teams A, B, and C are also trying their best to improve and might even improve faster than us.
Yeah in and year out, most of the teams we play in the Big Ten are going to make for competitive games. Just a fact of our life in our new conference.
Geez, splitting hairs much. Pretty sure you predicted 5 wins preseason right? If he was unrealistic, what the hell were you, Unrealistic - 1?And yes you were being unrealistic despite your breakdown.
Penn State just beat Ohio State, I know you want to cry over that and yes they are better than Minnesota with playmakers....and yes I know they played Minnesota close so what, RU played Michigan State close last year
I think you're probably right. But I also think people use the word "expectation" in different ways.I actually think most of the miserable people on here had no expectations. They just are simply miserable people.
You make me laugh. Because you don't agree that makes it unrealistic? No crap the final is what matters but that doesn't change the point. What did you think the scores were. What did you predict in your own threads? Let's see who was more realistic. As for PSU. Yes they beat OSU and it was a great win. It was also an outlier just like us and MSU last year. They needed OT to beat Minnesota at home, they got crushed by Michigan, struggles against a mediocre Temple team(lost to army), lost to an untested Pitt team. Track record says they are much closer to Minnesota than you want to accept. Ilinoist doesn't blow up anything. We turned the ball over 5 times. Do that against anyone and you lose. Irvine it laughable that two of the three teams I said we would beat bested us by a combined 9 points and I'm unrealistic.Again you overrated what RU has on this team. Who cares what the scores were. Its who wins the game...and your sure shot win over Illinois basically blows up your whole "we could have made a bowl" argument...no the team wasnt good enough to make a bowl..they lost to bottom feeder Illinois, RU is the bottom feeder now.
Geez, splitting hairs much. Pretty sure you predicted 5 wins preseason right? If he was unrealistic, what the hell were you, Unrealistic - 1?
Also, please use make sure to use flood in your answer.
You make me laugh. Because you don't agree that makes it unrealistic? No crap the final is what matters but that doesn't change the point. What did you think the scores were. What did you predict in your own threads? Let's see who was more realistic. As for PSU. Yes they beat OSU and it was a great win. It was also an outlier just like us and MSU last year. They needed OT to beat Minnesota at home, they got crushed by Michigan, struggles against a mediocre Temple team(lost to army), lost to an untested Pitt team. Track record says they are much closer to Minnesota than you want to accept. Ilinoist doesn't blow up anything. We turned the ball over 5 times. Do that against anyone and you lose. Irvine it laughable that two of the three teams I said we would beat bested us by a combined 9 points and I'm unrealistic.
BAAARRRRMP!!!I did predict 5-7 but after seeing the first 3 games I changed to 4-8 and after Michigan 3-9, I felt 5-7 was too optimistic based on those results....the poster in question literally stuck to his guns of 6-6 after the Michigan game. He must have felt that RU was going to close by winning 4 of 6, thats his choice to stick by his prediction in the face of overwhelming evidence against.
I think you're probably right. But I also think people use the word "expectation" in different ways.
Some fans are simply optimistic and maintain their optimism as a way of life. That's fine because they don't turn miserable when things don't go as planned. They name their expectations based on their hearts, not their heads.
Other people form expectations based on pure logic and data. So while they may not be happy with poor results, if they had low expectations, they don't lose their equanimity or their hope. Thus they don't turn miserable (mostly). But their logic can be irritating to the first bunch. I think I fall into this group most days, sorry group A. :)
The last category of fans actually weaponizes expectations so they can kill everyone with them. Those are the kind of fans who only post in the in-game threads when things are going poorly. They also often disappear entirely from the board when the team is doing well.
That last bunch totally sucks and I hope they get run over by a busload of nuns. Twice.
BAAARRRRMP!!!
We're sorry, we can't accept this answer since it did not include flood. Good luck next time!
Of course I stuck to my guns and feel free to use my name. I stuck to them because I expected to get killed my Michigan. By 70? No, but upper 50's.....in the words of your next President " what difference does it make at that point". My prediction didn't change because nothing about the team changed. The only thing I was wrong on pre season was I thought Laviano would be better suited to run this O. I was woefully incorrect. Since you like changing your predictions game to game. What do you predict out record over the next 4 and why?I did predict 5-7 but after seeing the first 3 games I changed to 4-8 and after Michigan 3-9, I felt 5-7 was too optimistic based on those results....the poster in question literally stuck to his guns of 6-6 after the Michigan game. He must have felt that RU was going to close by winning 4 of 6, thats his choice to stick by his prediction in the face of overwhelming evidence against.
DL is the biggest concern.There are no shortcuts to success OP. We're losing Hamilton, Pinnix Odrick, and Lambert. People behind them are unknown. Offense should be better.