ADVERTISEMENT

IMO, My case for not hiring Greg Schiano, FWIW

tico brown

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
Oct 16, 2005
18,010
12,722
113
If Rutgers is looking to be a legit B1G program, they have to move away Greg Schiano as far as possible. Yes it took him 6 years to rebuild Rutgers from where they were left behind by Terry Shea. That in itself should be commended. But for the next 5 years, he could not turn the table... get over the hump... take the program to the next level.

Yes, he did a good job recruiting the players he got who turned into pro players. But he couldn't lead those same players to a conference championship, let alone a BCS game. I know Rutgers has a great APR ratings and had players who were great representatives of the university. But unfortunately it all comes down to wins and losses 95% of the time.

Schiano's time has passed a long time ago and to hire him means that Rutgers is going backwards. I think that if Rutgers say "money is not going to be a problem," they should go all in and try to get the best coaches available, starting with Mark Richt. He has similar traits as Schiano as far as the off the field accomplishments, having players with character, and he will suspend players when others would give them a free pass. Plus it doesn't hurt that Richt's worst three records since 2001 are 6-7, 8-5, 8-5. I would make Richt's representative say that he's not interested so that the fans can see that the Rutgers admin are trying to improve this program.

If (when) Richt turn down Rutgers, they should go after a proven HC or a proven Coordinator who can light a spark for Rutgers, just like Schiano was a proven Coordinator when he was hired back in the day. There are plenty of choices out there who deserves the same chance Schiano got in 2001. (If theyre still available at this time) Dino Babers, Matt Rhule, Kirby Smart, Brett Venerbles, and others should at least get a call to see if they're interested. Plan C should be Schiano. Al Golden should not even get an email since he will more than likely bring his boy, Mark D'Onfrio with him. Mario Cristobal should also be avoided since he hasn't done well as a HC.

Sorry for the rant but I thought I would throw my 2 cents in. I do know that i will get destroyed by the Pro Schiano people here. Regardless if Schiano is coach or not, I will hope nothing but the best for the Rutgers program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrycesUncle
I am with you, tico. I think we would be moving backward with a Schiano hire. this is not Louisville or Kansas St. who hires back a winning coach. We need to move forward with the next chapter of Rutgers football and to enhance our position in the B1G. My worry is that Schiano is the easy way out. I think the best way out is more appropriate.
 
I also do not think Greg was kind to Rutgers on the way out. He basically gutted the coaching and support staff by offering them positions in Tampa. He left Flood and I believe one other assistant coach behind.
 
I agree that you need to go all-in to try to get Mark Richt. At least make a serious financial offer and let him turn you down, because if nothing else it shows that you're serious about trying to get a homerun hire.

And then my next call is to David Cutcliffe, who probably won't even be interested but is someone with experience winning in a place that has strong academics and struggled in football.

If that doesn't work, make a huge offer to Matt Ruhle, who is underpaid at Temple and I think could be had.

After that, meh, it really doesn't matter.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT