Two more replies to the original tweet:
The second reply tweet above nails it for a lot of fans. There are many who have given thousands, and some, tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of dollars to support their football team in an effort to compete the arms race to have fancier locker rooms, lounges, weight rooms, field houses, etc. At least with the money "invested" in those types of tangible items, the fans can see and perhaps feel that there is a return on their investment, because facilities provide equipment and direct support to develop football players.
Par for the course for the NCAA to adopt rules for a system that moves the goalposts and helps the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
And now we are to listen to the 78 rpm ramblings of a head coach who has produced exactly two winning seasons in seven years of college coaches, waxing poetic that his losing is the fault of the fans failure to contribute to collectives? Comical.
Here's an idea, Tom Allen. Donate half of your compensation to a collective, and then you will have 16 players who can be paid $150,000/year, and then watch a blue blood like Ohio State, Michigan, etc poach them away one or two years later after investing time and money developing those players. If that's "illegal" find a way to legally do it.
The B1G members will be receiving in the neighborhood of $70-80 million/year in media rights starting in 2024. Perhaps the B1G and other P5 members can figure out a way to direct some of that money to the players, instead of pointing their fingers at the fans, who have invested large sums of money over many years to see little reward for that investment, to move their money to NIL collectives where they will get what? A poster of a player or an appearance at their business? A long shot at landing a kid who may or may not pan out to be a star player, and if he becomes a star player, to watch the player bolt for more money? Sounds like a worst investment than FTX.