or as bad you find a gem and he has a great freshman year and then........
Yea, I'll keep saying it until I'm blue in the face.
The NCAA needs to fix the transfer rules and frame them around how many transfers a school can take in (in a given time frame). It makes sense to allow kids to move to different programs, so limiting student transfer is not win-able fight. But program eligibility based around how many transfers they take in makes sense.
If your program can't keep the kids in it (that it recruits) because:
A) Your environment sucks
B) You make broken promises
C) You recruit over them/don't get them on the field/court
The students should be free to transfer.
These are problems attributable to a program's leadership.
Let the kids move.
D) If you can't keep kids because they are being tampered with...
Then by capping how many new transfers a program can bring in you limit the ability for Miami, USC and their ilk to pillage the gems that were found and developed by the "have lesses".
This doesn't stop kids from being tampered with, but it reduces the frequency.
Kids are free to go, there are just less branches on the tree.
Doesn't eliminate it and still leaves the window open for a program to bring in a kid when too many seniors leave or legitimate mutual non-fits eventually happen.
But it would stop some of the craziness if the caps were an appropriate number.