It's about roster construction. It's a yearly game now.
With a $40 mil. yearly NIL budget behind him, Lincoln Riley is taking credit for a lot of things that have been handed to him. He's not constructing anything; he's pillaging others for their best players that others have developed.It's about roster construction. It's a yearly game now.
He coaches a system the players want to play in.With a $40 mil. yearly budget behind him, Lincoln Riley is taking credit for a lot of things that have been handed to him. He's not constructing anything; he's pillaging others for their best players that others have developed.
He turned walk on Baker Mayfield into a Heisman finalist and NFL 1st round draft pick. He turned Jalen Hurts from an erratic game manager of a loaded Alabama team into a running and passing TD machine at Oklahoma. The man knows offense and QBs the way sugar knows ice cream. Judging from the QB coaching butchery we've seen at RU in the last several years, it's hard to believe him and the coaches RU has hired are in the same profession.With a $40 mil. yearly NIL budget behind him, Lincoln Riley is taking credit for a lot of things that have been handed to him. He's not constructing anything; he's pillaging others for their best players that others have developed.
Would a ton of NIL money be worth it with Schiano? His teams had a tendency to play lower than their talent.And what are you doing about it Caliknight? You run your mouth like you are the elite of the elite. Surely you can let a little go for NIL.
Schiano can win with talent.Would a ton of NIL money be worth it with Schiano? His teams had a tendency to play lower than their talent.
He had enough talent to beat West Virginia, Cincinnati, the Big East and never did it. He's just not a great coach.Schiano can win with talent.
His top two DB’s played for Colorado and Washington his top WR played for Pitt. His top RB came from Oregon. They came to USC for money not because he’s some QB guru.He turned walk on Baker Mayfield into a Heisman finalist and NFL 1st round draft pick. He turned Jalen Hurts from an erratic game manager of a loaded Alabama team into a running and passing TD machine at Oklahoma. The man knows offense and QBs the way sugar knows ice cream. Judging from the QB coaching butchery we've seen at RU in the last several years, it's hard to believe him and the coaches RU has hired are in the same profession.
Smart people make smart investments. Schiano is like investing in a questionable stock. How much are you donating Gekko?And what are you doing about it Caliknight? You run your mouth like you are the elite of the elite. Surely you can let a little go for NIL.
They come for both. We have neither.His top two DB’s played for Colorado and Washington his top WR played for Pitt. His top RB came from Oregon. They came to USC for money not because he’s some QB guru.
You don’t get 26 transfers because they think he’s God playing football coach. You get them because you just spent a sh*t ton of money
Good synopsis on why college football now sucks.His top two DB’s played for Colorado and Washington his top WR played for Pitt. His top RB came from Oregon. They came to USC for money not because he’s some QB guru.
You don’t get 26 transfers because they think he’s God playing football coach. You get them because you just spent a sh*t ton of money
Riley can legit say he coached a bonafide NFL MVP candidate in Jalen Hurts with the Eagles right now.He turned walk on Baker Mayfield into a Heisman finalist and NFL 1st round draft pick. He turned Jalen Hurts from an erratic game manager of a loaded Alabama team into a running and passing TD machine at Oklahoma. The man knows offense and QBs the way sugar knows ice cream. Judging from the QB coaching butchery we've seen at RU in the last several years, it's hard to believe him and the coaches RU has hired are in the same profession.
You also get them because you have a track record of success and you're the head coach at a program that has a tradition of winning championships that goes back 5 decades.His top two DB’s played for Colorado and Washington his top WR played for Pitt. His top RB came from Oregon. They came to USC for money not because he’s some QB guru.
You don’t get 26 transfers because they think he’s God playing football coach. You get them because you just spent a sh*t ton of money
USC has generally been recruiting top classes for a long time. Usually top 10ish and a good handful top 5. Only Helton’s shaky status year and Riley relying heavy on the portal last year were outliers.You also get them because you have a track record of success and you're the head coach at a program that has a tradition of winning championships that goes back 5 decades.
USC is like LSU. Talent has never been the issue in either program. When they hire the right coach, they win. When they don't, the results are disappointing.USC has generally been recruiting top classes for a long time. Usually top 10ish and a good handful top 5. Only Helton’s shaky status year and Riley relying heavy on the portal last year were outliers.
I posted this tweet in the games thread. You’d think they have better results considering all this top classes dating back to 2008. The difference is the coach, at the very least Riley knows offense. Coaching matters at all levels from bigger status programs to the lower status. It can help you achieve your potential or above it or below it.
It’s not so easy to just say well they’re loaded with stars so of course they win. A number of teams are loaded with stars and don’t come close to any sort of achievement. See A&M or past USC teams as examples.
PAC12 title game is in hand and we’ll see if they can win it and get a CFP playoff berth. ND and one of Oregon, Utah, UCLA
Agree with thatUSC is like LSU. Talent has never been the issue in either program. When they hire the right coach, they win.
Come on. They bought and paid for 9 new starters, I'll give you the QB who followed him from Oklahoma. This isn't recruiting, this is simply outbidding everyone else to buy a winner. This isn't even the same team as a year ago.Agree with that
I agree it was like 20 transfers iirc but that’s not the point I’m making. Some teams get high star recruits or a bunch of transfers but it doesn’t mean they win at a high level.Come on. They bought and paid for 9 new starters, I'll give you the QB who followed him from Oklahoma. This isn't recruiting, this is simply outbidding everyone else to buy a winner. This isn't even the same team as a year ago.
All these people calling for a new coach I'd love to know where all the money is coming from? We don't get a full share from the B1G until 2027 as we are still paying back loans. Last year they got almost $40 mil. while others were making well into the 60's. UCLA/USC will get their full share $100 mil. in 2025, Rutgers won't get that full piece of the new contract pie.Greg Schiano is a character right out of central casting as to what a college football coach should look like, talk, and act to white men over 50. And he knows it, and he plays it up for his fans, he is not a stupid and unaware man. In fact, he is very smart, he knows exactly how to sell himself to a very important segment of our fanbase and administration. He is also a dinosaur in today's college football world and every year he stays is a year wasted, but fortunately, as stated by previous posters, the nature of the game has changed so that his failures should not have an affect on the next coach's ability to attract the necessary talent for us to be competitive in the B1G.
yep, money is the digital way.Our model is obsolete. Schiano is playing a game that has completely changed.
He's thinking analog in a digital world.
The programs dedicated to winning do not make coaching decisions based on buyouts.All these people calling for a new coach I'd love to know where all the money is coming from? We don't get a full share from the B1G until 2027 and are still paying back loans. Last year they got almost $40 mil. while others were making well into the 60's. UCLA/USC will get their full share $100 mil. in 2025, Rutgers won't get that full piece of the new contract pie.
Broke one's do. You seem to thing that just being in the B1G magically made that all go away. Sure when Rutgers is done paying back loans in 2027 and getting the full piece of the pie that won't be the case. But until then, they're broke.The programs dedicated to winning do not make coaching decisions based on buyouts.
you're right about that.The programs dedicated to winning do not make coaching decisions based on buyouts.
Our partial share would be a full share or more in the ACC, Big 12 and PAC. You make coaching decisions based on results on the field, not buyout $s. The continued losing will also affect the bottom line as far as game attendance $s, so let's not forget that fact.Broke one's do. You seem to thing that just being in the B1G magically made that all go away. Sure when Rutgers is done paying back loans in 2027 and getting the full piece of the pie that won't be the case. But until then, they're broke.
Again, money bucks, where's this magical money coming from? YOU? Everyone on this board who bitches about getting a new coach sure as sh*t aren't going to pay for it.Our partial share would be a full share or more in the ACC, Big 12 and PAC. You make coaching decisions based on results on the field, not buyout $s. The continued losing will also affect the bottom line as far as game attendance $s, so let's not forget that fact.
👍What does the Schiano looks and “acts like a white man of 50 “ have to do with this thread. Leave your bias white talk for the premium board.
How many of the top 5 teams would stop them?Anyone thinking that RU can construct a roster the same way a USC or any other established power can is simply living in a fantasy world. Could RU attract one of the top QBs, WRs etc to transfer? That isn’t happening. As much as the game has changed, it still starts up front at the LOS. I watched most of the USC/UCLA game, some may think that is exciting great football. I do not. The defense by both teams was awful in the 2nd half. While these are good teams , I don’t think either is a playoff caliber team. They could not stop a legit top 5 team.
This is modern day recruiting. You either play the game or don’t win.Come on. They bought and paid for 9 new starters, I'll give you the QB who followed him from Oklahoma. This isn't recruiting, this is simply outbidding everyone else to buy a winner. This isn't even the same team as a year ago.
SC focused on the offense. This off-season will be the defense. Even so, 10-1 with a top five ranking in year one. That’s winning.Anyone thinking that RU can construct a roster the same way a USC or any other established power can is simply living in a fantasy world. Could RU attract one of the top QBs, WRs etc to transfer? That isn’t happening. As much as the game has changed, it still starts up front at the LOS. I watched most of the USC/UCLA game, some may think that is exciting great football. I do not. The defense by both teams was awful in the 2nd half. While these are good teams , I don’t think either is a playoff caliber team. They could not stop a legit top 5 team.
He’s doing what most BIG coaches not named Franklin, Day or Harbaugh are doing. Even Franklin and Harbaugh took time to get to where they are they just didn’t start at the bottom. Same can be said for Lincoln.Our model is obsolete. Schiano is playing a game that has completely changed.
He's thinking analog in a digital world.