Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really sure why Rice would harbor ill will towards Rutgers. 1) He did those things on his own, not because RU made him do it 2) RU didn't fire him right away. They tried to just discipline and move on. It was someone from his own staff who leaked the video to the press that started a fire that couldn't be controlled until it burned him, Pernetti and the school to the ground. If anything he owes us. He ruined my/our school's reputation with his own decisions and actions. Not the other way around.
While I don't agree with that style of coaching, I have witnessed or experienced everything shown in the video. I found it ironic listening to an ESPN TV commentator I had as a coach make negative comments about the situation when he did they same thing. If you take any coaches worst moments and splice them together in a 5 minute film they will come off looking terrible. Was Mike Rice wrong? Definitely. There were warning signs before he was hired and the situation should have been managed better from an RU perspective. People like to criticize Barchi regarding sports but this is the one item he definitely screwed up by not being more proactive, although it is quite possibly it was played down by Pernetti giving Barchi the impression no big deal. The blow back on RU is primarily on Pernetti and some on Barchi for mismanaging the entire affair.
Also, the line has moved over the years.I think more than anything the Mike Rice situation showed us exactly where the line is. Any of us who have played high level sports have seen similar behavior. My favorite text after the incident went public was from a friend who played high D1 basketball. His text said "basketball coaches around the country are burning their practice tapes as we speak".
That incident is the line. Yelling in a kids face isn't the line as we see it every week on a whole bunch of sidelines across the country. The line is a physical action. Rice was the HC who showed every other HC where the line is.
I think more than anything the Mike Rice situation showed us exactly where the line is. Any of us who have played high level sports have seen similar behavior. My favorite text after the incident went public was from a friend who played high D1 basketball. His text said "basketball coaches around the country are burning their practice tapes as we speak".
That incident is the line. Yelling in a kids face isn't the line as we see it every week on a whole bunch of sidelines across the country. The line is a physical action. Rice was the HC who showed every other HC where the line is.
That incident is the line. Yelling in a kids face isn't the line as we see it every week on a whole bunch of sidelines across the country. The line is a physical action. Rice was the HC who showed every other HC where the line is.
The SNL "Outside the Lines" parody linked to in the story is pretty funny.
If you want to blame Tim for the results of those hires, you also have to give him credit for entry into the Big Ten. But I am sure you won't.And Pernetti made the two worst hires in decades in our two most important sports - could never figure out why he got such strong support after that - he set RU back by years.
If you want to blame Tim for the results of those hires, you also have to give him credit for entry into the Big Ten. But I am sure you won't.
I would argue that the "line" was getting caught on video tape. It does not make it right, but many other coaches have done the same or worse. The difference is the video tape.
I don't know about that "everyone knows" stuff, but at least you gave him some credit. My point was to respond to your wondering why anyone supported Tim. There were a lot of reasons, but the Big Ten invite sealed it for many clear-minded people. Without that, Rutgers would be nowhere. For whatever reason, Mulcahy did not get it done, but maybe you think Hermann could have pulled it off. Anyway, you said you did not understand why people supported Tim, and that is why.Why would you say that? He gets some credit for closing the deal, but most of the credit for that goes to Schiano and Mulcahy for building an actual football program (which includes facilities and the stadium expansion), which made it clear big time football was not only possible, but achievable, at RU. Everyone knows we almost got the invite well before Tim came along, but then Nebraska became available.
The Mike Rice fiasco was always overblown. Just an example of the phony outrage lynch mob looking for another victim. In my opinion. Still, Tim P. and others should have seen the warning signs, and managed it better.
I agree. But do you think the Rice incident changed behavior amongst HCs at the college level? I believe it absolutely has. Which is why I believe the incident, or tape if you want, has as a result defined "the line".
I think if a kid or kids came out and said their HC is firng basketballs at them, unless that coach was K or Izzo or similar, that HC is in trouble. No video needed anymore. Heck Lonergan at GW got fired for seemingly less. But the kids went public, the Washington Post picked up the story, and he was gone.
Yes, I think the countervailing evidence of Rice controlling his temper and Pernetti proactively managing him was the Tim Higgins end the game before it was over episode in MSG. Pernetti went to Rice before he got to the media room and told him something to the effect that you are going to be on a big stage so play it cool. If you watched that presser you'd never guess Rice was a hot head.The Mike Rice fiasco was always overblown. Just an example of the phony outrage lynch mob looking for another victim. In my opinion. Still, Tim P. and others should have seen the warning signs, and managed it better.