I'm not saying it isnt. I'm saying either it is and we are the underdog and should lose to every B1G team hands down, or it isnt, and we could win but don't. I am of the opinion that we have the horses that would out us getting smacked around by Washington, OSU, and UM. But that we have the horses to compete w teams like ill and lost due to poor execution, coaching, personnel management, and play selection. I expect a combination of all the above issues plus lack of talent to render us winless the rest of the way. That's my .02 I was simply pointing out that some don't seem to acknowledge we have more issues than just lack of talent, so if we operate on the premise that MN is beatable, lets have an honest discussion about the reasons if we lose.
All that said, I think the staff can right this ship in a few years, but it should start with seeing game day improvement from here on out. Esp if we put another QB in.
Iowa - execution KILLED us. Laviano left 3 TD's on the field
Illinois - TO's KILLED us
Neither were about coaching IMHO. COULD it have been better? COULD we have done some things differently? Sure. But even NFL coaches have bad days, or bad starts to their career, without talent. Even WITH those 2 games as "W's" we would have gotten beat badly by Washington and slaughtered by OSU and Michigan. The cupboard is "bare" regardless. When you lose 1 guy and it nearly shuts down your O and ST's, well, that's really all anybody needs to know. The discussion kinda ends right there, right?