"Their" not "there". I would also try some more punctuation. 3/102nd in the big ten tournament made the tournament and won there first game. So yes the definition of past us since we are not playing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Their" not "there". I would also try some more punctuation. 3/102nd in the big ten tournament made the tournament and won there first game. So yes the definition of past us since we are not playing
It’s one good season.2nd in the big ten tournament made the tournament and won there first game. So yes the definition of past us since we are not playing
You said twice
You said psu made it twice
Field of 64 isnt a thing
Rutgers made it 3x
Penn State 2x
Northwestern 1x
Also, passed not past. I'm going 2/10 for this latest reincarnation."Their" not "there". I would also try some more punctuation. 3/10
It was more than just missed open looks when you have to work 20-25 seconds every possession in a 30 sec shot clock to get those looks, your legs get tired working that hard every possession. A lot of PSU shots came up short or long compensating on the shots they took last time. We beat them down physically than mentally.Disagree. It was good but PSU missed a ton of good looks.
2nd in the big ten tournament made the tournament and won there first game. So yes the definition of past us since we are not playing
Awesome work! You worrying about my grammar on a blog is like posting a luck analytic to explain why we lose. No one cares"Their" not "there". I would also try some more punctuation. 3/10
Yup.
“Field of 64”= definition of agenda-driven data.
Would you rather lose to PSU twice and be on the second round of the tournament or beat them twice and be home right now?It’s one good season.
And we kicked the crap out of them twice this year. They also graduate basically everyone
The point of the luck comments is for whatever reason many things happened this season that you pretty much have to chalk up to - it wasn’t meant to be. If it’s true what they say about luck balancing out - I’d rather get the bankers over with vs Hofstra and hopefully have a luckier year next season. In the realm - losing to Hofstra or one of the next NIt games is meaningless.Awesome work! You worrying about my grammar on a blog is like posting a luck analytic to explain why we lose. No one cares
Good teams execute and don’t rely on analytics. The “Luck” rating is nothing more then and excuse to explain why a team did not execute.The point of the luck comments is for whatever reason many things happened this season that you pretty much have to chalk up to - it wasn’t meant to be. If it’s true what they say about luck balancing out - I’d rather get the bankers over with vs Hofstra and hopefully have a luckier year next season. In the realm - losing to Hofstra or one of the next NIt games is meaningless.
Not sure you realize your confusion here. You’re saying what I said. Tagged you in the post so you can go back and see it.You said twice
You said psu made it twice
Field of 64 isnt a thing
Rutgers made it 3x
Penn State 2x
Northwestern 1x
Nobody is relying on it. But some are spewing out that we took an obvious step down this season which is a joke and the luck factor explains that. If even one of those Minny 3s rims out - we’re in the field at 20-13 and no way play in (we would be 11-9 vs 10-10 for PSU). That’s the single difference between seasons. On the flip side - to have even a prayer at the field - RHJ had to nail a half court shot last season. So yes - luck is the only explanation to differentiate the outcomes of the 2 seasons. It’s garbage to conclude we took a step down. Not true.Good teams execute and don’t rely on analytics. The “Luck” rating is nothing more then and excuse to explain why a team did not execute.
Valid and good point because every offensive oriented team can have a bad night. However playing UVA or RU style of basketball is you keep every team you play in the game. The smallest mistake late in games will cost you. Free throws, in bounds plays etcKyk and RUSojo also won’t mention how offense first Arizona lost in the first round to Princeton, despite claims that it’s the defense first teams that lose in the tournament.
You mean Jay wright not RUsojo and kyk.Kyk and RUSojo also won’t mention how offense first Arizona lost in the first round to Princeton, despite claims that it’s the defense first teams that lose in the tournament.
Losing at OSU was bad luck - no way to control for ref mistakes. The MSU game dropping to Q2 as a home win instead of a Q1 neutral site was ... unexpected and unfortunate, but not sure about it being unlucky. SHU blowing the final 30 seconds against DePaul and slipping to Q3 was bad luck for us, too. Losing Mag for the season on a non-contact injury was bad luck. Losing Mulcahy for a few games when he hurt his shoulder diving for loose ball, while we also were down McConnell, was bad luck.Good teams execute and don’t rely on analytics. The “Luck” rating is nothing more then and excuse to explain why a team did not execute.
Wrong! Pike plays the Simpson lineup after the MSU win, and does not wait until the big tournament we are not talking about luck. Caleb hits the front end of the one and one against MINN we are not talking about luck. Pike calls a timeout when Hyatt panicked, before Paul threw it away we are not talking about luck. Execute !!!Nobody is relying on it. But some are spewing out that we took an obvious step down this season which is a joke and the luck factor explains that. If even one of those Minny 3s rims out - we’re in the field at 20-13 and no way play in (we would be 11-9 vs 10-10 for PSU). That’s the single difference between seasons. On the flip side - to have even a prayer at the field - RHJ had to nail a half court shot last season. So yes - luck is the only explanation to differentiate the outcomes of the 2 seasons. It’s garbage to conclude we took a step down. Not true.
There's (I got that right?) a group of posters who simply ignore other's replies when they don't fit their (right again?) narrative.Kyk and RUSojo also won’t mention how offense first Arizona lost in the first round to Princeton, despite claims that it’s the defense first teams that lose in the tournament.
OSU was not bad luck! PIKE fouled up 3 which he has never done in his career and did not do again after. They were a good FT shooting team and we are not . Bad coaching decision. They hit 2 and Caleb hit one. If Caleb makes them both or Pike plays it straight up then the refs never come into it. ExecuteLosing at OSU was bad luck - no way to control for ref mistakes. The MSU game dropping to Q2 as a home win instead of a Q1 neutral site was ... unexpected and unfortunate, but not sure about it being unlucky. SHU blowing the final 30 seconds against DePaul and slipping to Q3 was bad luck for us, too. Losing Mag for the season on a non-contact injury was bad luck.
Several things bounced in a bad way for us this year.
yeah and the only thing that the NCAA did was penalize us for the Mag injury and not give us any consideration of the other three.Losing at OSU was bad luck - no way to control for ref mistakes. The MSU game dropping to Q2 as a home win instead of a Q1 neutral site was ... unexpected and unfortunate, but not sure about it being unlucky. SHU blowing the final 30 seconds against DePaul and slipping to Q3 was bad luck for us, too. Losing Mag for the season on a non-contact injury was bad luck. Losing Mulcahy for a few games when he hurt his shoulder diving for loose ball, while we also were down McConnell, was bad luck.
Several things bounced in a bad way for us this year.
This is something you presumably have experience with, given that you spend your time making hundreds of message board accounts in a desperate attempt to continue participating in a community that hates you.No one cares
There are execution factors for both teams all game. But the reality is in that circumstance..no matter how you got there it was bad luck. Sorry. I disagree.OSU was not bad luck! PIKE fouled up 3 which he has never done in his career and did not do again after. They were a good FT shooting team and we are not . Bad coaching decision. They hit 2 and Caleb hit one. If Caleb makes them both or Pike plays it straight up then the refs never come into it. Execute
When y’all make multiple posts about it and like every comment that agrees with it, then I think I mean RUSojo and KykYou mean Jay wright not RUsojo and kyk.
Spill the beans. How do you guys no this? (hha..I KNOW it is KNOW and just being a St. Pat's day smart a$$)This is something you presumably have experience with, given that you spend your time making hundreds of message board accounts in a desperate attempt to continue participating in a community that hates you.
So RUsojo kyk AND Jay wright fineWhen y’all make multiple posts about it and like every comment that agrees with it, then I think I mean RUSojo and Kyk
Fair but late game execution is not luck and has been a problem for Pike.There are execution factors for both teams all game. But the reality is in that circumstance..no matter how you got there it was bad luck. Sorry. I disagree.
More than one thing can be true. We played that game out to the end and won it on the floor by forcing OSU out of bounds. They executed well enough to win.OSU was not bad luck! PIKE fouled up 3 which he has never done in his career and did not do again after. They were a good FT shooting team and we are not . Bad coaching decision. They hit 2 and Caleb hit one. If Caleb makes them both or Pike plays it straight up then the refs never come into it. Execute
What is ?
Psu starting 3 portal player?
Pickett being all big ten 2nd all American
RU making the field 1 time
NW PSU currently in field and out of round 1
I apologize for misrepresenting the facts.
Disagree. It was good but PSU missed a ton of good looks.
In 2023 I thought we could move past a community hating one individual. It’s ok that your wrong and know nothing about basketball. Your a great person with wonderful grammar !This is something you presumably have experience with, given that you spend your time making hundreds of message board accounts in a desperate attempt to continue participating in a community that hates you.
2nd in the big ten tournament made the tournament and won there first game. So yes the definition of past us since we are not playing
No there was no Covid field but o understand we had a good team and it’s nice to talk about. Being in and losing the PLAY IN game is not in the field. Hence why it’s called the PLAY IN game . It’s great for PIKE negotiating his contract but just not realRu was in the field 2x...3x if you count thw covid year thanks
Well as some evidence note that his response to my post doesn't even deny this or ask me wtf I'm talking about, which is I feel what most people would do if someone said they had 100+ accounts.Spill the beans. How do you guys no this? (hha..I KNOW it is KNOW and just being a St. Pat's day smart a$$)
Seriously though. I see lots of folks making claims like this and I am not doubting you. Just want to know how you guys track such things.
It's actually not called the play in game.No there was no Covid field but o understand we had a good team and it’s nice to talk about. Being in and losing the PLAY IN game is not in the field. Hence why it’s called the PLAY IN game . It’s great for PIKE negotiating his contract but just not real
Not sure you realize your confusion here. You’re saying what I said. Tagged you in the post so you can go back and see it.
Has St Peters passed Kent
Your right everyone around the country does not consider it the play in game. I just must have missed it when I was filling out my bracket this year .It's actually not called the play in game.
Yes they are correct because they are exactly what I said in the first post! LolField of 64 isnt a thing
My numbers are corrected
Ru 3x..psu 2x..nw 1x
Nextt
No there was no Covid field but o understand we had a good team and it’s nice to talk about. Being in and losing the PLAY IN game is not in the field. Hence why it’s called the PLAY IN game . It’s great for PIKE negotiating his contract but just not real
Yes they are correct because they are exactly what I said in the first post! Lol