BC: L
Wagner: W
Temple: L
Iowa: L
OSU: L
Nebraska: L
Indiana: L
Minny: L
Mish: L
MSU : L
Pen St: L
Maryland: W
Wagner: W
Temple: L
Iowa: L
OSU: L
Nebraska: L
Indiana: L
Minny: L
Mish: L
MSU : L
Pen St: L
Maryland: W
I really don‘t understand why people keep saying this about BC. They finished last in their division last year, and the ACC media, which should know them best, picked them to finish second to last this year. There is no reason to think this is a good football team. A lower tier team from the BIG should be able to beat a lower tier team from the ACC.The reality is- we beat BC- we beat a fairly decent team. I would then expect 5/6 wins. We lose- 3 wins.
unless- we start the season with Noah, bring inGW at game 4/5 and he shows up as the WB we are all hoping for…
If he proves he could be our best ever- 6 wins and a bowl
maybe because they beat VaTech/GaTech Played Fla St/@Clem/@L'Ville all very tough.I really don‘t understand why people keep saying this about BC. They finished last in their division last year, and the ACC media, which should know them best, picked them to finish second to last this year. There is no reason to think this is a good football team. A lower tier team from the BIG should be able to beat a lower tier team from the ACC.
Virginia Tech fired their coach, Georgia Tech is awful, Florida State was awful last year, Clemson had their worst team in over a decade, Louisville was pretty bad too. And they lost to Syracuse. They were not very good. And this year, maybe their OL can come together by the end of the season, but the first half of the year is likely to be pretty rough.maybe because they beat VaTech/GaTech Played Fla St/@Clem/@L'Ville all very tough.
I am not going to say they are a 'good' team but like I said- fairly decent. and it is at their home. You beat them in an away game- it is a solid win.
The type of statement you make- sets RU up in a lose lose situation. and I think we have a lot of people that post here that like to do the same thing.
Just waiting to see us maybe win a close game and throw off a good win as a "we beat a weak team, we should have won by more" or we lose to them close and the take is that the season is a disaster as we lost to a horrible ACC team.
I think I did well for myself with 1 game left, Nebraska 13-14 and Mich St 21-27 results in the books, two games that could've put us at 6-6 or betterIf Schiano picks the right QB and move the defense more to a 4-2-5(3 safeties with the lack of quality LBs) look, they have a chance at 6-6 or better, otherwise 4-8, 5-7.
Well- you did hit the points.Better question is why were expectations so low in Year 3, coming off a bowl appearance, returning senior starting QB and TE, OL transfers, depth at RB (returning Monangai/Young and incoming recruits)?
RUforlife looks to be the leader in the clubhouse going into the Maryland game.4-8
Wins over BC, Little Sisters of the Poor, Temple and Indiana.
Well- you did hit the points.
1)Bowl appearance was a fluke even though we enjoyed it. It was not a bowl team on the field.
2) senior starting QB and TE- Vedral hurt all year and when he did start, he played hurt. We settled on living with a freshman QB. Sr TE- assuming you mean JT. In his 2nd year at TE. Need I say more
3) OL Transfers. They just didn't play as expected. And first time all playing together.
4) Depth ar RB- yes, and the best one that could have actually been a difference maker rather than just a piece, got hurt for the year.
Anything else stupid to add. None of us are "happy" - ok, there are some more happy that they were right, that we would suck then they would have been if they were wrong if we were better- but we all have some concerns- the points you just made are just DAF.
Better question is why were expectations so low in Year 3, coming off a bowl appearance, returning senior starting QB and TE, OL transfers, depth at RB (returning Monangai/Young and incoming recruits)?