Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not able to watch tonight. I’m afraid to ask…what happened?Bread
OMG
McDavid is unreal. Doesn’t the Calgary ice rink look smaller than other rinks ? It looks uniquely different.You are never really in trouble in a series until you lose at home, to be fair, hang in their.
Now onto Alberta, #97 is the new #99 in Edmonton, what a goal!
Yes it does. Maybe they wanted to be as different on the inside of the building, as they are on the outside, 😆.McDavid is unreal. Doesn’t the Calgary ice rink look smaller than other rinks ? It looks uniquely different.
rangers fans get strangely quiet when losingHockey talk slowing down here, cmon folks.
Rangers tie up their series with the Canes 2-2. Home ice holding true this far. Can the Rangers find a way to break through in Carolina Thursday night?
Except no one commented after a Rangers win in game 3. Nice try.rangers fans get strangely quiet when losing
Hockey talk slowing down here, cmon folks.
Rangers tie up their series with the Canes 2-2. Home ice holding true this far. Can the Rangers find a way to break through in Carolina Thursday night?
I was looking for the playoff thread like we had last year.rangers fans get strangely quiet when losing
I started one this year, but this thread is the one that maintained some traction so I just bumped it. Look back a few pages.I was looking for the playoff thread like we had last year.
What gives?
Down 2-1. Silence. Again.Except no one commented after a Rangers win in game 3. Nice try.
Your e doubling down on that ignorant angle? It takes about it 10 seconds to see that this thread died down after the Rangers WON the game on Sunday.Down 2-1. Silence. Again.
Obviously you have not been watching the playoffs.rangers fans get strangely quiet when losing
Not sure how you post this when the series was tied 2-2 for more than ½ hour at the time. Personally I have been busy with family this past weekend, work and getting ready to travel for the weekend. I have watched every game and enjoyed the last 2.Down 2-1. Silence. Again.
Canes goal was off such a weak zone entry turnover by Trouba. And then the Rangers goal was on a PP when Cole took a terrible cross check penalty. I guess these things even out, but as a Rangers fan, c'mon Trouba!
The call was right of course, but man, have we had a single review go our way yet these playoffs?At least THAT review was the correct call. LOL.
One day, we'll get one of those our way though. I'm an optimist.
Eh I thought he played it pretty well, it was just a perfect saucer pass by Staal. The idea that the defender always takes away the pass on a 2 on 1 is actually a common misconception. I used to think that too until I was fortunate enough to be teammates with a goalie who had played in the ECHL. He explained that the defender's role on a 2 on 1 is really to prevent the shot from coming from the middle. For example if you have two right-handed guys coming at you, you want the guy on your left to be the shooter because it means the shot comes from a worse angle, so if the guy on your right has the puck, you go to him so he passes. If the guy on your left already has it, you take away the passing lane but you don't go too close to the open guy because you're trying to make the guy shoot as opposed to letting him walk right in front on a breakaway and deke the goalie.Trouba giveaway was bad. Think the lone defender needed to stay closer to the middle to protect against the pass; the shooter is Igor's guy. The one in a 2 on 1 has to keep the pass from going through.
Mistake, bit move on now.
If you’re clearly doing a Ronaldo no matter where on the ice I don’t think it should be a goal. Same where it’s clearly incidental, crease or no grease…goal.Welp I was hoping the Battle of Alberta would go 7 games but McDavid just ended it. He's putting up Gretzky numbers so far this postseason, hopefully he keeps it up.
Controversial call late in the 3rd though, Coleman directed the puck in with his skate to give Calgary a late lead but it was deemed to be a kick so it was overturned. I felt it was the right call but they really need to change this rule because it's a gray area almost every time. Every league should do what the WHL did about 5-6 years ago--if a puck goes off a skate outside the crease it's a goal, and if it goes off a skate inside the crease then it's no goal. No more struggling with everyone's differing interpretation of what "distinct kicking motion" actually means.
Agree.Coleman's foot changed direction as he made contact, so I thought it was the right call. That said, it calls out for a rule's clarification, like the Brett Hull's skate in the crease goal to win the '99 Stanley Cup against the Sabers.
The idea isn't so much to allow kicking, it's to just ensure consistency by eliminating the gray area. Conversely, they could also just make any goal that goes off a skate disallowed. Just one way or the other so that it's not such a coin flip on which way the review is going to go. Of course if you wind up and punt it, everyone knows that's a kick, or if you have no idea where the puck is and it bounces off your skate and in, that's clearly not a kick, but the majority of these reviews involve a player intentionally redirecting the puck in a motion that some people may determine to be a "distinct kicking motion" while others may not. "Distinct kicking motion" isn't defined well enough and it probably isn't possible to do so.If you’re clearly doing a Ronaldo no matter where on the ice I don’t think it should be a goal. Same where it’s clearly incidental, crease or no grease…goal.
And with replay now it does make it easier IMO to get it right.
Agree.
Watching it live from the first angle, behind the play, it looked at the bare minimum a reviewable call.
And I wanted Calgary too.😕
Same here, plus I am a big Coleman fan from "pickle juices" Devils days.If you’re clearly doing a Ronaldo no matter where on the ice I don’t think it should be a goal. Same where it’s clearly incidental, crease or no grease…goal.
And with replay now it does make it easier IMO to get it right.
Agree.
Watching it live from the first angle, behind the play, it looked at the bare minimum a reviewable call.
And I wanted Calgary too.😕
Hopefully Gallant leaves the kid line alone this time and doesn’t outsmart himself by moving people around like putting Kakko on the 4th line.On train coming home from game. Nice rowdy crowd. We will win game 7 if Igor plays well imho.
It’s the one opponent where the Rangers don’t have a goaltending advantage, though.Nyr matches up very well vs Tampa