I thought we were requiring everyone to show proof of a negative covid test first?Absolutely unreal. Do we have restrictions at airports for incoming travelers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought we were requiring everyone to show proof of a negative covid test first?Absolutely unreal. Do we have restrictions at airports for incoming travelers?
Where are hospitalizations increasing?Hospitalizations have taken a path upward as all of the other metrics,discharges,intensive care,those on ventilators are plummeting.
The question that comes to mind:Are more marginal cases being admitted and higher standards for discharges being put in place for financial reasons?That's not politics but merely a suspicion of greed clouding the issue.
Absolutely unreal. Do we have restrictions at airports for incoming travelers?
Who cares how many cases Texas had? NJ still leads death per capita. Texas is 21st on the list. Its not even close.
So the NJ healthcare workers didn't care?As a healthcare worker, and reading about the hospital situations after the last fiasco in Texas, I'd say the healthcare workers down there care. And I'll add to that, the patients and families of the patients admitted probably care a great deal as well. You think deaths per capita is the only thing anyone should focus on in regards to Texas? And by the way, using your metric, 21st is nothing to celebrate. For the size of Texas and how spread out the population is, I'd venture to say 21st most deaths per capita is a pretty poor job by them.
Edit: 32nd most in population density but 21st in death rates...can I get another yeehaw for Texas??
You realize that NJ/NY would both have death rates in the middle of the pack if we hadn't been the first ones hit and so hard don't you? As per numerous previous posts of mine, the deaths per hospitalization in the spring wave were double what was seen during the summer and since then, because there were no efficaceous treatments and the medical procedures used by summer were not really well developed until the spring wave was largely over.Who cares how many cases Texas had? NJ still leads death per capita. Texas is 21st on the list. Its not even close.
NJ was in a lockdown in the beginning. Explain how density played into the equation when everyone was in their own homes? Did it jump from house to house magically?You realize that NJ/NY would both have death rates in the middle of the pack if we hadn't been the first ones hit and so hard don't you? As per numerous previous posts of mine, the deaths per hospitalization in the spring wave were double what was seen during the summer and since then, because there were no efficaceous treatments and the medical procedures used by summer were not really well developed until the spring wave was largely over.
So if one halves the deaths for the spring wave, then NJ/NY both drop to about 1700-1800 deaths/1MM, which would put both behind at least a dozen states. NJ/NY had 50-60% of their deaths in the spring, while the vast majority of states had less than 5% of their deaths in the spring (including Texas).
In addition, being hit first, we had almost no interventions in place when the virus was silently multiplying exponentially in the densest population areas in the country (with very high commuting densities) - if we had had any testing in place we could have put interventions like distancing/masking in place well before mid/late March, when testing started getting going, and likely avoided a large chunk of those spring deaths on top of halving the death rates as discussed above. We also would've likely started the stay-at-home orders 1-2 weeks earlier, which several studies have said would've saved 50-80% of the lives lost in wave 1 (covered this back in the spring also). Both states would have lower death rates per capita than Texas if we had not been hit first and so hard.
It was rampant in March before the lockdown, mask-wearing, testing, etc. I’ll say again, please be careful about the path you’re leading this thread down. I know no one has brought up politics yet but we all know it’s coming.NJ was in a lockdown in the beginning. Explain how density played into the equation when everyone was in their own homes? Did it jump from house to house magically?
And before you say they would have done better than Texas let me remind you how poorly they did with nursing homes. I don't see those numbers changing if they still decided to keep seniors in the long care facilities as they did.
You have zero idea what you're talking about. Zero. I've covered all of this before in great detail and don't have time right now to dredge up the old posts on this. Maybe later. Suffice it to say that we likely had 10K+ undiagnosed cases by early March and probably 50K+ cases by mid-March when the stay at home orders were issued. We just didn't know it because testing didn't really get going at all until mid-March. And that's why hospitalizations started peaking at the end of March (there's a lag from cases) and deaths started peaking in early April - and those peaks were far higher than we've seen since.NJ was in a lockdown in the beginning. Explain how density played into the equation when everyone was in their own homes? Did it jump from house to house magically?
And before you say they would have done better than Texas let me remind you how poorly they did with nursing homes. I don't see those numbers changing if they still decided to keep seniors in the long care facilities as they did.
Explain early May, still 3000 new cases a day.You have zero idea what you're talking about. Zero. I've covered all of this before in great detail and don't have time right now to dredge up the old posts on this. Maybe later. Suffice it to say that we likely had 10K+ undiagnosed cases by early March and probably 50K+ cases by mid-March when the stay at home orders were issued. We just didn't know it because testing didn't really get going at all until mid-March. And that's why hospitalizations started peaking at the end of March (there's a lag from cases) and deaths started peaking in early April - and those peaks were far higher than we've seen since.
With the Ebola vaccine in place and being used and Ebola not being an airborne, respiratory disease (like COVID is; Ebola is only spread by blood or body fluids and is only transmissible once obvious symptoms have started), the risk of an obviously infected Ebola patient escaping detection at an airport are extraordinarily low.I believe US citizens need answers to why we are allowing travelers from known Ebola countries ( Guinea and DRC) to fly into Newark Airport and JFK. What F &$$&ing moron is the ok ‘ er for this . In the midst of a pandemic and you are allowing possible flights from Africa to the USA. This is actually blatantly stupid and someone needs to explain why ? We saw what happed a year ago with flights from China and Europe how did that work out?
What about early May? Cases and hospitalizations had already started dropping quickly and deaths soon followed, as the lag is longer for deaths. Also, if a decent % of people were already infected by mid/late March and mask-wearing wasn't recommended by the CDC until early April, what do you think happened in all of those households and small groups of people seeing each other where maybe 1 person was infected? Yeah, transmissions kept going on at a pretty high rate into mid-April, dropping off in late April. Even non-scientists should be able to see the huge difference in trajectories between NJ and Texas (and 95% of the rest of the US) and understand that NJ/NY deaths would be far lower if we hadn't been hit hard, early, and completely unprepared.Explain early May.
I saw young people I assume were either first responders or had underlying conditions.Any younger than 65 patients Zap? I’m ready to go when they’re ready for me.
You realize that NJ/NY would both have death rates in the middle of the pack if we hadn't been the first ones hit and so hard don't you? As per numerous previous posts of mine, the deaths per hospitalization in the spring wave were double what was seen during the summer and since then, because there were no efficaceous treatments and the medical procedures used by summer were not really well developed until the spring wave was largely over.
So if one halves the deaths for the spring wave, then NJ/NY both drop to about 1700-1800 deaths/1MM, which would put both behind at least a dozen states. NJ/NY had 50-60% of their deaths in the spring, while the vast majority of states had less than 5% of their deaths in the spring (including Texas).
In addition, being hit first, we had almost no interventions in place when the virus was silently multiplying exponentially in the densest population areas in the country (with very high commuting densities) - if we had had any testing in place we could have put interventions like distancing/masking in place well before mid/late March, when testing started getting going, and likely avoided a large chunk of those spring deaths on top of halving the death rates as discussed above. We also would've likely started the stay-at-home orders 1-2 weeks earlier, which several studies have said would've saved 50-80% of the lives lost in wave 1 (covered this back in the spring also). Both states would have lower death rates per capita than Texas if we had not been hit first and so hard.
It was rampant in March before the lockdown, mask-wearing, testing, etc. I’ll say again, please be careful about the path you’re leading this thread down. I know no one has brought up politics yet but we all know it’s coming.
The tristate area for a four to six week period ahead of mid March 2020 was a large, unprotected target rich environment for viral spread. Millions of densely packed commuter busses and rails spilling onto subways. Crowded restaurants and bars in cold weather. Unrestrained travel to and from most of Europe. No testing whatsoever. It was close to a perfect set of circumstances for spread, and no doubt the number of infected people was far higher than reported.
Ok thanks ... I was aware of how it is transmitted just needed an educated opinion on the virus . I just hope the screening process is in place? Don’t want to see it become a part of a US lifestyle.With the Ebola vaccine in place and being used and Ebola not being an airborne, respiratory disease (like COVID is; Ebola is only spread by blood or body fluids and is only transmissible once obvious symptoms have started), the risk of an obviously infected Ebola patient escaping detection at an airport are extraordinarily low.
https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/transmission/index.html
Posted this on Friday. I think the efficacy differences (with regard to preventing mild/moderate COVID) could be at least partly due to different locations and timing/variants for the J&J vs. mRNA vaccines. Plus #1, #2, and #3 most important is that they all seem to prevent hospitalization and death, so I would take any of them if offered.
"In the least surprising news of the day, the FDA advisory panel voted 22-0 to recommend and Emergency Use Authorization of the J&J single shot adenovirus vector vaccine. Great news for everyone. Efficacy is probably a bit lower than the mRNA vaccines (but that's harder to read since Pfizer/Moderna ran their trials earlier and didn't likely encounter some of the new variants, while J&J did), but the take home message for all of them is that they all prevent hospitalizations and deaths after full dosing (after 28 days for J&J with full immune response). That is so much more important than small efficacy differences and the refrigerated storage is a nice bonus. We need them all to beat the pandemic, worldwide, so this is a great day for science and humanity. Formal approval by the FDA should come tomorrow."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/26/world/FDA-Johnson-and-Johnson-vaccine.html
You are begging to make this political. Literally begging. Please stop for the sake of the thread.
So the 3000+ new cases 5/3 were from March?? Gotcha.What about early May? Cases and hospitalizations had already started dropping quickly and deaths soon followed, as the lag is longer for deaths. Also, if a decent % of people were already infected by mid/late March and mask-wearing wasn't recommended by the CDC until early April, what do you think happened in all of those households and small groups of people seeing each other where maybe 1 person was infected? Yeah, transmissions kept going on at a pretty high rate into mid-April, dropping off in late April. Even non-scientists should be able to see the huge difference in trajectories between NJ and Texas (and 95% of the rest of the US) and understand that NJ/NY deaths would be far lower if we hadn't been hit hard, early, and completely unprepared.
So the NJ healthcare workers didn't care?
It means that Texas did a lot better job than NJ in helping people recover from Covid which has zero to do with population density so your explanation is just nonsense.
You also do realize they have over 3x the population of NJ.
its stuff like this that makes people want to trust the scientific community less...
trying to normalize mask wearing and social distancing every winter...wtf
He is and always does. The stated goal of the CE board cabal is to have these threads locked, deleted or moved to the CE board. That's a big part of why they post what they do. The only way to refute his incorrect claims is to get political, since that is at the heart of what happened in the US, especially during the first few months of the outbreak - and that would get the thread at least locked again, so I won't do it.You are begging to make this political. Literally begging. Please stop for the sake of the thread.
He is and always does. The stated goal of the CE board cabal is to have these threads locked, deleted or moved to the CE board. That's a big part of why they post what they do. The only way to refute his incorrect claims is to get political, since that is at the heart of what happened in the US, especially during the first few months of the outbreak - and that would get the thread at least locked again, so I won't do it.
Texas governor is a moron. I feel bad for the healthcare workers there.
He is and always does. The stated goal of the CE board cabal is to have these threads locked, deleted or moved to the CE board. That's a big part of why they post what they do. The only way to refute his incorrect claims is to get political, since that is at the heart of what happened in the US, especially during the first few months of the outbreak - and that would get the thread at least locked again, so I won't do it.
certainly some people gaming the system too.I saw young people I assume were either first responders or had underlying conditions.
zero. None were contagious when they left the hospital.ny and nj sent covid patients to nursing homes, you forget to mention that..how many did they directly kill
You'll never win a data analysis argument with me - you should simply give up now. Picking individual days is frowned upon with so many daily variables not being controlled (particularly testing and data dumps of results). If one looks at the 7-day moving average, NJ cases peaked in the 3500-4000 cases per day through most of April, but were actually likely in the 10,000-15,000 range (if we had been testing as much as we tested in the winter peak), which is why our hospitalizations, a much truer indicator of an outbreak's size, were double in April what they peaked at from mid-Dec to mid-Jan.So the 3000+ new cases 5/3 were from March?? Gotcha.
you know who won't keep living their life, her son's beloved music teacher who died of covid.its stuff like this that makes people want to trust the scientific community less...
trying to normalize mask wearing and social distancing every winter...wtf
So you are saying it would be unwise to take additional precautions if it saved more lives? What's next? Avoid the flu vaccine too because it might help?
He is and always does. The stated goal of the CE board cabal is to have these threads locked, deleted or moved to the CE board. That's a big part of why they post what they do. The only way to refute his incorrect claims is to get political, since that is at the heart of what happened in the US, especially during the first few months of the outbreak - and that would get the thread at least locked again, so I won't do it.
You lost me and your mind after NJ has done a pretty good job.You are going off the rails. People mentioned Texas and I responded about Texas. You said "who cares" about Texas and injected NJ. And if you cant realize population density doesn't matter in the spread of (and the respreading of) this virus, I got no more words for you. FYI, Texas is 35 times bigger than New Jersey. In a nutshell, they are wayyyy more spread out and less likely to infect others. And the Covid bomb was not dropped off in Texas and spread unabated like it was in NJ. The fact that Texas is 21st in deaths per capita when their population density ranks 32nd is not an achivement. Read what @RU848789 says above. After the initial smackdown in late winter/early spring, NJ has done an pretty good job overall despite being the densest state in the nation.