Is that your Taurus tailgate vehicle?I just transferred title of a 1997 model year car, and was told at the DMV that because it is 25 years old it is now exempt from inspection. I had never heard that before, is that new?
Your first choice is to post this verse google it? Not trying to be a jerk, but like, really?I just transferred title of a 1997 model year car, and was told at the DMV that because it is 25 years old it is now exempt from inspection. I had never heard that before, is that new?
Your first choice was to challenge someone's desire to get direct info from posters here rather than Google "What does 'convivial' mean?"Your first choice is to post this verse google it? Not trying to be a jerk, but like, really?
First, remember that the only inspection in New Jersey is emissions inspection -- safety inspection was abolished years ago. Second, emissions inspection in New Jersey consists mostly of making sure that the fuel cap has not been tampered with to allow leaded gasoline and of testing the diagnostics on the car to make sure that the "check engine" light will come on if there is a problem with the emissions control system. Very old cars do not have diagnostics, and New Jersey (like most states with emissions inspection) decided it would be too much trouble to have a separate testing system for those vehicles because there aren't enough pre-1996 cars on the road to make any difference to air pollution levels.Does it make any sense to exempt old, shitty cars with no built-in safety systems from inspection?
I mean, wouldn't those be the cars you'd *want* to inspect?
Retrofitting the geezer-mobiles to meet current standards would likely be untenable, and given that there are relatively few of such cool-looking menaces on the road an exemption was made. But when I see a disgusting piece of shit blowing unburned oil into the air it makes me wish there was a capture device on the thing. Or something.Does it make any sense to exempt old, shitty cars with no built-in safety systems from inspection?
I mean, wouldn't those be the cars you'd *want* to inspect?
Your first choice was to challenge someone's desire to get direct info from posters here rather than Google "What does 'convivial' mean?"
The Little Engine That Could.I'm still trying to figure out what verse I quoted. Was it from Stairway To Heaven? Bohemian Rhapsody? Dante's Inferno?
First, remember that the only inspection in New Jersey is emissions inspection -- safety inspection was abolished years ago. Second, emissions inspection in New Jersey consists mostly of making sure that the fuel cap has not been tampered with to allow leaded gasoline and of testing the diagnostics on the car to make sure that the "check engine" light will come on if there is a problem with the emissions control system. Very old cars do not have diagnostics, and New Jersey (like most states with emissions inspection) decided it would be too much trouble to have a separate testing system for those vehicles because there aren't enough pre-1996 cars on the road to make any difference to air pollution levels.
Retrofitting the geezer-mobiles to meet current standards would likely be untenable, and given that there are relatively few of such cool-looking menaces on the road an exemption was made. But when I see a disgusting piece of shit blowing unburned oil into the air it makes me wish there was a capture device on the thing. Or something.
I'm not entirely opposed to your first point regarding older vehicle inspections for basic safety and engineering, especially lifted trucks and cars with Maxwell coffee cans masquerading as exhaust systems.Some missing of points.
First, I'm aware of how MVI works. I'm also aware of how it used to work.
My point is that shitty old cars should be subject to the inspections that they were subject to when they were shitty new cars. Check the lights, check the brakes, ensure that any and all modifications conform to the letter of the law - e.g. anyone driving around in a truck that's raised 3 feet, has wheels that are nowhere inside the wheel wells and no exhaust system should experience 1) confiscation, 2) incarceration and 3) eventual execution (upon exhaustion of all appeals, of course).
The point should NOT be to enable / encourage shitty old cars on our roads. It should be to make it so difficult to keep them that people give up trying.
The new cars of my youth sucked ass. The new cars of my father's youth were even worse. Speak not to me of "the glorious muscle cars of yore", for they sucked ass equal in quantity to their non-muscular brethren - they simply did it at much greater volume. They were, by today's standards, slow, uncomfortable, inefficient and unsafe. They should be purged.
I'm not entirely opposed to your first point regarding older vehicle inspections for basic safety and engineering, especially lifted trucks and cars with Maxwell coffee cans masquerading as exhaust systems.
That was my first thought. Seems backwards.Does it make any sense to exempt old, shitty cars with no built-in safety systems from inspection?
I mean, wouldn't those be the cars you'd *want* to inspect?
We can still buy manual transmission cars. I have two and will likely get a third in the next few years.I'm not entirely opposed to your first point regarding older vehicle inspections for basic safety and engineering, especially lifted trucks and cars with Maxwell coffee cans masquerading as exhaust systems.
However, if implementing your system results in the eradication of manual-transmission vehicles over time, then we have a problem. I'm willing to to battle over this.
Might be because people who tend to drive older cars won't have the money to get it up to code?Does it make any sense to exempt old, shitty cars with no built-in safety systems from inspection?
I mean, wouldn't those be the cars you'd *want* to inspect?
I'd be happier if inspections checked at least the basics, steering, tires, and brakes. I care about that stuff more than about emissions. Those are all basic maintenance issues and critical to safe operation of the vehicle.I remember ( back in the day) being told fix it or junk it when my first car failed inspection and received temporary sticker to place on window so could drive car legally for 30 or 60 days ( forget which)till had to take it back to be inspected .
Just got another car, that could pass and the junkyard received a new POS to add to the pile.
If safty check wasn't done when I first started driving and couldn't afford anything but a beater, my first pice of junk would have stayed on the road a bit longer before it hit the land of used auto parts.
So you tamper with your gas cap to allow leaded gas - but where do find leaded gas?First, remember that the only inspection in New Jersey is emissions inspection -- safety inspection was abolished years ago. Second, emissions inspection in New Jersey consists mostly of making sure that the fuel cap has not been tampered with to allow leaded gasoline and of testing the diagnostics on the car to make sure that the "check engine" light will come on if there is a problem with the emissions control system. Very old cars do not have diagnostics, and New Jersey (like most states with emissions inspection) decided it would be too much trouble to have a separate testing system for those vehicles because there aren't enough pre-1996 cars on the road to make any difference to air pollution levels.
Of course there are restrictions for use but you can also register it as Historic getting Historic Plates and never have to pay to register it again :)I just transferred title of a 1997 model year car, and was told at the DMV that because it is 25 years old it is now exempt from inspection. I had never heard that before, is that new?
I had to add “fun” lolSome missing of points.
First, I'm aware of how MVI works. I'm also aware of how it used to work.
My point is that shitty old cars should be subject to the inspections that they were subject to when they were shitty new cars. Check the lights, check the brakes, ensure that any and all modifications conform to the letter of the law - e.g. anyone driving around in a truck that's raised 3 feet, has wheels that are nowhere inside the wheel wells and no exhaust system should experience 1) confiscation, 2) incarceration and 3) eventual execution (upon exhaustion of all appeals, of course).
The point should NOT be to enable / encourage shitty old cars on our roads. It should be to make it so difficult to keep them that people give up trying.
The new cars of my youth sucked ass. The new cars of my father's youth were even worse. Speak not to me of "the glorious muscle cars of yore", for they sucked ass equal in quantity to their non-muscular brethren - they simply did it at much greater volume. They were, by today's standards, slow, uncomfortable, inefficient and unsafe. FUN They should be purged.
I had to add “fun” lol
I do agree with inefficient and unsafe. And yes, most cars today are faster- but it just isn’t the same. I had the 74 Super Nova with a 350 and a 77 TransAm with the Olds 402- both with headers and tge TA with a shift kit- air shocks on both and 60’s/50’s most of the time bald because I couldn’t afford new tires - kept the originals just for inspection
But spit on the road and you could be dead lol
My 77 was also a 3 speed automatic- we did all types of things to up the HP- like breaking out the front of the useless hood scoop and placing screening in there instead. Believe they said it added about 4 HP…lolYeah... dead in slow motion.
Would it surprise you to know that Car & Driver's full road test of the '77 W72 Trans Am demonstrated a 0 to 60 time of 9.3 seconds? The aftermarket headers and shift kit wouldn't have done much to improve that. At any rate, 9.3 seconds is nearly twice what would be considered "quick" by today's standards. There a literally dozens of new cars on the market that can get to 60 in the high 4s / low 5s. Most "sports cars" are down in the 3s.
This is why I'm generally anti-old car - and contemporaneously, when I was in high school, I *loved* the W72 T/A. That car was absolutely totemic. But time marches on and ain't nobody got time for "slow". 😉
My 77 was also a 3 speed automatic- we did all types of things to up the HP- like breaking out the front of the useless hood scoop and placing screening in there instead. Believe they said it added about 4 HP…lol
No need for the stickers. Just get the fastest color, duh. My butt dyno tells me I got at least 11HP more by doing that.Nowadays it's very easy to add HP to a car, just put a bunch of speed shop stickers on the windows. I've heard you can get up to an additional 5HP per sticker!
There may be some truth…I had the Red TA with the black/gold bird. It was the fasted of our group of trans ams back then. LolNo need for the stickers. Just get the fastest color, duh. My butt dyno tells me I got at least 11HP more by doing that.
I had a highly tricked out '77 Chevelle that I bought from a widow in Jamesburg. Her husband had ordered the car, then died. She didn't know anything about it other than her husband had special ordered it, died and she didn't like driving it.There may be some truth…I had the Red TA with the black/gold bird. It was the fasted of our group of trans ams back then. Lol
And btw- working on that engine with the headers and duals just sucked. Had to raise the engine to get to a couple of spark plugs.
Very nice surprise. Funny to think how little HP these big blocks actually put out compared to now.I had a highly tricked out '77 Chevelle that I bought from a widow in Jamesburg. Her husband had ordered the car, then died. She didn't know anything about it other than her husband had special ordered it, died and she didn't like driving it.
The guy who lived next door when I was growing up was the service manager at the old Briggs Chevy in South Amboy. He came over to look at it, stopped when he got to the tailpipes and told me to open the hood.
Apparently the old guy from Jamesburg had ordered a 1977 Chevelle with an L82 motor.
Right? The "standard" L48 'vette motor in '77 was 180 hp, exactly the same as the Oldsmobubble 403 ci engine in your T/A (the Pontiac engine was 190 hp). The L82 was 210 hp.Very nice surprise. Funny to think how little HP these big blocks actually put out compared to now.
No reason to do safety or emissions testing. Many states have discontinued both.
Florida eliminated emissions testing in 1981 and directed that funding to law enforcement.
Now- you do have to keep in mind many of the modifications we did back then, such as headers, shift kit etc.Right? The "standard" L48 'vette motor in '77 was 180 hp, exactly the same as the Oldsmobubble 403 ci engine in your T/A (the Pontiac engine was 190 hp). The L82 was 210 hp.
My freakin' Volvo has 316 hp from its supercharged/turbocharged 2.0l 4 cylinder.