That video is surreal: the lighting, the music, his reaction.Can’t stop watching
ME TOO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That video is surreal: the lighting, the music, his reaction.Can’t stop watching
If I ever cross paths with you, I’m sticking my fist in your pathetic face. F*ck you.
[/QUOTEIf you ever get the chance add one for me. And please let their be video.
He was very respectful - Joe will be also when his staff tells him who she is. That is a fact.Wow! Trump properly respectful and circumspect. Now if he'll just stay off Twitter in the morning.
Yup, elections will cause 3 new justice appointments. Once again, the Dems will not have the votes in 2021, even in the best case scenario for them. Sorry.no violence, we will just pack the courts. Elections have consequences
He was very respectful - Joe will be also when his staff tells him who she is. That is a fact.
I'm not sure it qualifies as street cred, but Blackmun and Berger were called the Minnesota Twins.
I also find it more offensive that blue check Dems on twitter are threatening violence and riots if another justice is voted on
Except I’m commenting on what her own family is claiming she allegedly said. Mourn all you want. I have no issue with you doing that.let me say the empathy you are showing is very disturbing.
But for some caring about others is not the problem, the problem is that persons inability to allow others to show respect for a person that just passed away.without their posting something disrespectful.
If your disrespectful ways are because of a political position, let me remind you Justice Ginsburg despite her political leanings and the deceased Justice Antonin Scalia who was far from liberal were good friends and respected each other despite their differences.
One can disagree with someone's POV, but also can respect them as a person and morn when they pass away.
In her tribute to Justice Scalia , Ginsburg wrote:
"From our years together at the D.C. Circuit, we were best buddies. We disagreed now and then, but when I wrote for the Court and received a Scalia dissent, the opinion ultimately released was notably better than my initial circulation. Justice Scalia nailed all the weak spots—the 'applesauce' and 'argle bargle'—and gave me just what I needed to strengthen the majority opinion. He was a jurist of captivating brilliance and wit, with a rare talent to make even the most sober judge laugh. The press referred to his 'energetic fervor,' 'astringent intellect,' 'peppery prose,' 'acumen,' and 'affability,' all apt descriptions. He was eminently quotable, his pungent opinions so clearly stated that his words never slipped from the reader’s grasp. "
Shame that type of class seems lost on some people and they can't find nice things to say at a time nice things said would be the rule of the day. Or just be courteous and not say anything..
Too soon. There will be a time and place for that discussion. This is not the time. (Neither is this board the place, but it's the only board we've got.)
I haven't read through the thread.I've been trying to determine whether a Senator must be present and must vote on a Supreme Court nomination.Murkowski and Collins haven't said that they'll vote no,only that they won't vote.Has Romney joined in?
In any event,this likely will crowd out all other issues over the next 45 days barring something really unexpected.
Amy Barrett will make an incredible replacement.
She’s highly qualified. And yes. She’d right the RBG wrong and stop baby murder. Along with others.Why? Just because she is a practicing Catholic and may vote to overturn Roe vs, Wade. It would divide this countrry even further and deeper. If the Repuplicans have spine, they would wait with the nomination after the election. What did McConnel say 3.5 years ago when he did not let Obama to nominate a supreme court judge 10 months befor the election? Something like the American electorate should have a voice in the nomination. Per the Biden doctrina (same rules should be applied for Republicans and Democrats), we know that 42 days before the election the Republicans should not start the nominating process that they denied Obama 10 months before the election. This will became an election issue since it would highlight the character of the Republican politicians. Those who are engaged in highly competative races would likely absent from voting, otherwise, they may loose their reelection on November 3rd.
“Repugs”? Can’t put my finger on it, but someone else used that term here. Kind of ironic, that same guy used to post about how healthy and strong RBG was. Wonder what he’s up to these days.It is the same, but if repugs dare go through with this, dems will pack the court.
Same guy. Formerly. It’s been confirmed.“Repugs”? Can’t put my finger on it, but someone else used that term here. Kind of ironic, that same guy used to post about how healthy and strong RBG was. Wonder what he’s up to these days.
I don’t want the abortion issue to be a driving force. That being said, if roles were reversed, the Dems would be Looking to vote. Trump has tons of warts but his best attribute is he does to the Dems what guys like Bush and Romney wouldn’t. He fights fire with fireWhy? Just because she is a practicing Catholic and may vote to overturn Roe vs, Wade. It would divide this countrry even further and deeper. If the Repuplicans have spine, they would wait with the nomination after the election. What did McConnel say 3.5 years ago when he did not let Obama to nominate a supreme court judge 10 months befor the election? Something like the American electorate should have a voice in the nomination. Per the Biden doctrina (same rules should be applied for Republicans and Democrats), we know that 42 days before the election the Republicans should not start the nominating process that they denied Obama 10 months before the election. This will became an election issue since it would highlight the character of the Republican politicians. Those who are engaged in highly competative races would likely absent from voting, otherwise, they may loose their reelection on November 3rd.
I don’t want the abortion issue to be a driving force. That being said, if roles were reversed, the Dems would be Looking to vote. Trump has tons of warts but his best attribute is he does to the Dems what guys like Bush and Romney wouldn’t. He fights fire with fire
No. They are going to stick with the Democrat stance. Harry Reid strikes again!Are the Republicans going to stick with their 2016 stance and wait until after elections?
Handle every pointed question about it with aplomb
No. They are going to stick with the Democrat stance. Harry Reid strikes again!
lmao wasn’t 2016 like almost a year before elections? That situation was ridiculous. This is a little over a month before elections. Way different story and is exactly what the Republicans argued against in 2016.
Repugs is a common term. Many people use it. She was a very healthy and strong woman though.“Repugs”? Can’t put my finger on it, but someone else used that term here. Kind of ironic, that same guy used to post about how healthy and strong RBG was. Wonder what he’s up to these days.
Sorry courts will be packed. You can complain all you want. Fillibuster will be ended D.c. and Puerto Rico will be states.Yup, elections will cause 3 new justice appointments. Once again, the Dems will not have the votes in 2021, even in the best case scenario for them. Sorry.
Triggered? Wait how triggered you will be when Puerto Rico and D.C. become states, we are gonna pack the courts too. Then take your guns!!Does this guy Greg2020 have a career or just post here nonstop. Wow. Chill bro. Get some sleep. Take a day off. No one really cares what you have to say and probably if only we all could meet in person you’d never have the nerve to show up. Pack the courts? Let us know which one you will be at perhaps.
That said, according to republicans it's an election year. Kim Jong Un should be our next president he'll nuke those libs, show no mercy!!!!I don’t want the abortion issue to be a driving force. That being said, if roles were reversed, the Dems would be Looking to vote. Trump has tons of warts but his best attribute is he does to the Dems what guys like Bush and Romney wouldn’t. He fights fire with fire
Can’t wait.Triggered? Wait how triggered you will be when Puerto Rico and D.C. become states, we are gonna pack the courts too. Then take your guns!!
We also don’t treat Supreme Court nominations like witch hunts with silly accusations and desperation, we don’t weave fake collusion stories and spend $40 million investigating them and we don’t make impeachment into a completely partisan act with silly invented charges.We don't appoint Supreme Court Justices in election years now so there won't be a vote, right? I'm sure the Republicans on the board will line up to agree with this. It was their party that came up with this rule after all.
I don’t know how you could even force yourself to say “no violence” when there’s been well in excess of 500 riots in the last 4 months and they’ve been cheered on by Dems.no violence, we will just pack the courts. Elections have consequences
Well it’s not exactly is it. Remind me if Obama has another term he was running for ?lmao wasn’t 2016 like almost a year before elections? That situation was ridiculous. This is a little over a month before elections. Way different story and is exactly what the Republicans argued against in 2016.
Wow. I didn’t know that. That almost defies logic.Does anyone find it telling that in her 40 years on the Federal benches,she had exactly ONE African-American law clerk?