The Cult will have an excuse of course. But if you read through to the end you find out it is about more than Sandusky. Paterno had gone off the rails. The child raping was only part of the problem. There was no institutional control. Which IS an NCAA violation.
"The school's athletic department was also scrutinized by federal investigators, who said then-head coach Joe Paterno once had his secretary email Spanier and Curley to say he would take care of disciplining players involved in a fight at an off-campus apartment building in 2007..
Paterno then had a text message sent to players telling them that if they went to the university's judicial affairs to answer code of conduct complaints they'd be "thrown off the team," the report said.
In 2009, a football player who stood accused of a serious sex crime was called into the Office of Student Conduct for an interview. According to Student Conduct officials, the player's first question was, "Does football know I'm here?'"
This is the university itself, not the athletic department. I wonder where the money comes from to pay the fine.
"Fines related to the Sandusky matter are $27,500" but whatever
"Fines related to the Sandusky matter are $27,500" but whatever
No one here, or in the article, is saying Sandusky "stuff" is unimportant. You have to go to BWI and Black Shoes Diary for that sort of nonsense. What the facts uncovered by the US Dept of Ed. show is the depravity of harboring a child raper is only a part of the problem with the Football Program and the University it ran.i understand that and im not saying the Sandusky stuff means nothing
Don't come around here telling us about hyped headlines. We know how that works.just that the headlines are sensationalized at best.
Yes, this is incomprehensible, to the NCAA, Big Ten Office, Judge Freeh, members of the Penn State board that voted to fire Paterno. Only those in the hive can understand the special circumstance that is Nittany Football.the 2007 fight has a whole other set of circumstances that is too long to explain
Candidate for understatement of the month right there.but i agree it wasn't Paterno's best moment.
The point is the fine is not just in response to the Sandusky incident but indicative of a complete systemic failure of the entire Penn State organization. It does not minimize the Sandusky acts."Fines related to the Sandusky matter are $27,500" but whatever
"Fines related to the Sandusky matter are $27,500" but whatever
I can't wait for the day this guy dies so this s..t could be put to rest.
It won't end with Sandusky's death.
If it is like every other fine by a Federal agency it goes into the US Treasury.Where does the 2.4 million go to specifically speaking.
"Fines related to the Sandusky matter are $27,500" but whatever