This thread should be deleted. Embarrassing for our fans to say this after psu (much to my chagrin) beat the number 2 team in the country.
Again, you missed the sarcasm and the compliment in the OP. (Not you), but some folks are too dense to get past the title.This thread should be deleted. Embarrassing for our fans to say this after psu (much to my chagrin) beat the number 2 team in the country.
Again, you missed the sarcasm and the compliment in the OP. (Not you), but some folks are too dense to get past the title.
Let me make it clear. Statistics don't win games. Points do. Just ask Texas Tech, whose Patrick Mahomes threw for 734 yards last night in a losing effort. On third downs, Texas Tech and Mahomes went 16-of-19 for 263 passing yards and 3 for 39 rushing to gain 17 first downs and score 3 TDs.
As stated in the original thread (or my second post), PSU played a more complete game on defense (especially when it counted) and special teams. Kudos to them.
Was not my intent to rile anyone up. Just was having a little fun with the the statistics. When RU has lost, many fans, including me, look for positives in games, mostly in the stats--Ash did this in his press conference after the Illinois loss. It's not rocket science-clean up the turnovers, and we win last 2 games--but that does not speak to Minnesota's turnovers. It's part of the game.I get it, but the title takes away from any point being made. Now that its been changed, It makes more sense.
Was not my intent to rile anyone up. Just was having a little fun with the the statistics. When RU has lost, many fans, including me, look for positives in games, mostly in the stats--Ash did this in his press conference after the Illinois loss. It's not rocket science-clean up the turnovers, and we win last 2 games--but that does not speak to Minnesota's turnovers. It's part of the game.
Still wondering what Urban Meyer was thinking with that rushed field goal. Even the great coaches make mistakes once in a while. Great play by PSU to block it and run it back. But I still hate them, and think "they suck."
You like getting dominated and ultimately winning? Not a bad position to be in.
Not an Ohio State fan and defended PSU here but just saw that last Ohio State drive. That last? pass downfield was pass interference-OSU got raked on that one.
Here's another interesting statistic(s): PSU 24 - OSU 21 ; OSU 58 - Rutgers zero, squat, nada zilchPenn State:13 first downs, 276 total yards and 2-of-13 third down conversions.
Trace McSorley completed only 8-of-23 pass attempts.
PSU time of possession: 22:41 .
Special teams is of minimal importance. It was just luck, the weather and maybe a little bit of home field advantage.
Penn State Sucks.
---
EDIT- lest anyone think the post was making fun of PSU, you missed the sarcasm and the point. Credit them for grinding and finding a way to win despite having a so-so night on offense. Defense and special teams won this game for them.
Source: ESPN
Adam Rittenberg ESPN Staff Writer
![]()
Ohio State lost despite allowing only 13 first downs, 276 total yards and 2-of-13 third down conversions. Penn State beat Ohio State despite a quarterback (Trace McSorley) who completed only 8-of-23 pass attempts and only 22:41 of possession time.
EDIT 2- changed the title because it was too provocative for some.
Joe Galloway (an OSU guy) disagrees. As does Danny Kanell.Not an Ohio State fan and defended PSU here but just saw that last Ohio State drive. That last? pass downfield was pass interference-OSU got raked on that one.
You supply the rope and I'm sure someone will oblige.Long story short: Penn St sucked , but they beat one of the best.
Hate saying that but the Nits won and that's the statistic that really counts
in the W-L column and B1G standings.
( someone hang me, I'm defending a Nit victory :angry::cry: :chairshot:)
Penn State:13 first downs, 276 total yards and 2-of-13 third down conversions.
Trace McSorley completed only 8-of-23 pass attempts.
PSU time of possession: 22:41 .
Special teams is of minimal importance. It was just luck, the weather and maybe a little bit of home field advantage.
Penn State Sucks.
---
EDIT- lest anyone think the post was making fun of PSU, you missed the sarcasm and the point. Credit them for grinding and finding a way to win despite having a so-so night on offense. Defense and special teams won this game for them.
Source: ESPN
Adam Rittenberg ESPN Staff Writer
![]()
Ohio State lost despite allowing only 13 first downs, 276 total yards and 2-of-13 third down conversions. Penn State beat Ohio State despite a quarterback (Trace McSorley) who completed only 8-of-23 pass attempts and only 22:41 of possession time.
EDIT 2- changed the title because it was too provocative for some.
@Knight Shift ,Here's another interesting statistic(s): PSU 24 - OSU 21 ; OSU 58 - Rutgers zero, squat, nada zilch
Here's another interesting statistic(s): PSU 24 - OSU 21 ; OSU 58 - Rutgers zero, squat, nada zilch
Joe Galloway (an OSU guy) disagrees. As does Danny Kanell.
You supply the rope and I'm sure someone will oblige.
Not an Ohio State fan and defended PSU here but just saw that last Ohio State drive. That last? pass downfield was pass interference-OSU got raked on that one.
That was a brutal blown call.
Are these the same posters who are not college football coaches, running every practice/team meeting, who knew all along Gio should have started? What stocks do they recommend?P
Seriously? They just beat the #2 ranked team and you're complaining about the way they did it?
Final score determines the winner, not the stat sheet.