Please, Rutgers, don’t forget what makes Jersey Mike’s Arena great | Politi
Renovations are needed, but the Rutgers basketball arena is not supposed to be a luxury experience.
www.nj.com
So where are your season tickets located and how long have you been in that location? Don't bother answering. I already know the answer.People just love to complain. I’m sure the much needed renovations will be great.
A lot of those are people taking clients, vendors, etc out to games. Half of them would rather do anything than be at the game, it’s essentially just another work commitment to them.The North Carolina guy is right. If the focus is mostly on luxury we’re going to be disappointed with the end result. As far as catering to the celebs and big donors… look at what we have today with court side seats. I sit in row A in the 100 section and unless it’s a huge game, the big wig seats one row in front of me are:
A - often empty
B - when occupied the folks wear anything but Rutgers gear
C - rarely participate in any cheers or crowd activities
D - arrive late and leave early
E - talk and don’t pay attention to the game
F - linger well into the second half eating chicken fingers and cheap beer in the hospitality area
E - are often Not RU fans and often not even true hoops fans
OF COURSE there are exceptions (give me Todd Frazier every game), but the bottom line is IF YOU WANT TO STERILIZE AND NEUTRALIZE the great JMA/RAC atmosphere we all crave, then go heavy on the transient “luxury“ seeking fans.
What are you angry about here old man? Let’s talk it out gramps.So where are your season tickets located and how long have you been in that location? Don't bother answering. I already know the answer.
100Rutgers alums and fans only care about their individual bottom line screw the needs of the athletic programs. It’s why we are amongst the lowest if not the lowest in terms of donations in the BIG. It’s an old cheap fanbase who counts every dime.
I feel like people are just not listening to every bit of communication that has come out about this project overtime as your 1) and 2) is EXACTLY what has been communicated and is exactly what is going to be accomplished in this project.Hobbs quote is spot-on:
“We’re not going to change the atmosphere. We’re going to maintain the atmosphere, but folks know we need better concourses. We need more concessions. We need premium seating. We need a few more bathrooms — maybe four times what we have now.”
That is EXACTLY what we need . The renderings don’t really answer whether this design does that. Looks like a large luxury area.
Politi also added a few other things like - the ability for people to eat or drink the concessions.
Bottom line: sure add some luxury stuff for the high rollers but it is imperative that the improvements:
(1) fix the significant PROBLEMS with the RAC: not enough bathrooms; larger concourses; more bathrooms; places for the regular people to sit down and eat the concessions
while…
(2) NOT taking away from what makes the RAC special (and I think that would happen with an over emphasis on luxury accommodations)
I feel like people are just not listening to every bit of communication that has come out about this project overtime as your 1) and 2) is EXACTLY what has been communicated and is exactly what is going to be accomplished in this project.
Didn’t intend to imply you weren’t. Many are not and you laid out the communication to date nicely and demonstrated it takes care of exactly what people say they want in text.I’m listening - I quoted Hobbs for goodness sake
But it’s one thing for them to SAY that and another thing to accomplish just that.
The rendering didn’t answer that conclusively for me. There weren’t floor plans (which I’d be able to read) just a bunch of conceptual renderings (to give the flavor of things). But no plans showing the amount of new bathrooms, the extent of luxury stuff, the widths of the new concourses, etc.
this is not a criticism (i understand they aren’t at that state yet) but the renderings don’t prove (to any degree) that this will ACCOMPLISH what they are SAYING
thus as the process moves forward and plans come together - the fans need to hammer these points home. Repeatedly
That’s all
Wow! That is SO funny! Hahahahaha.What are you angry about here old man? Let’s talk it out gramps.
Didn’t intend to imply you weren’t. Many are not and you laid out the communication to date nicely and demonstrated it takes care of exactly what people say they want in text.
Most people aren’t responding with “sounds good just need more details later about the areas the we are targeting to rightfully improve”. Most people are saying Hobbs is out of touch and that he is going to screw over season ticket holders.
Winning equals cash flow.If there is a desire for corporate seating and we can maintain the decibels in there it is a complete no brainer. We have a cash flow problem that makes the state paper of record excoriate us every 6 months. This is exactly the time to make the changes. The iron is hot. Let’s go!
They still sell those spots -- the "owners" simply don't show up. I know a handful of generous donors. Not six-figure people, but solid mid-five figure supporters. A few have those spots now because they were already donating so they figured they might as well get a dedicated spot for some of their money.A while back, for football, they made the first row of parking in the green lot a reserved spot for 10,000
The first year they had more cars there that I would have guessed
Now, a vast wasteland
The first year or two the owners did show upThey still sell those spots -- the "owners" simply don't show up. I know a handful of generous donors. Not six-figure people, but solid mid-five figure supporters. A few have those spots now because they were already donating so they figured they might as well get a dedicated spot for some of their money.
As for the RAC, there is money to be made by having premium seating. I get that it "needs to be done", but I can promise you they won't be at every game. Moreover, they are not the types to sell their tickets -- they'll offer them to clients, and who knows if they show up, or eat the tickets. We see it in every venue that has premium seating. And, RU won't care if the seats are empty on game day because hey we got the money.
I appreciate Hobbs' statements. They are well intentioned. And, of course, he's dead wrong. It absolutely will change the atmosphere. More importantly, it will price out 75% of fans from their current sections.
I mean he nailed it . But this board beat him to it yesterdayPoliti right on target
This isn’t happeningRAC is multiuse.. with practice areas and so on.. that ends. It becomes a basketball-sized venue only. No more folding bleachers.
This idea relies on teh concept of the large columns inside that hole up teh roof from the inside, get moved outside and hold up the new larger-area roof from above it.
1) remove roof
2) remove columns that hold up roof
3) wrap-around seating in 100s. Removing everything standing in the way of doing that... include path to lockerrooms/media rooms and wrap-around walking path at tip of 100s
4) 200s and 300s demolished
5) wrap-around 200s while building-in TV-Media boxes on one side and luxury on the other. with seats over them. Re-grade 200s and 300s to fit the boxes. Steeper/closer (unless you sink court a bit and add to 100s and grade. fewer seats with seatbacks but made up for an more by new wrap-around seating. Walls and structure to support 200s and 300s pushed out farther to allow for larger concourse area, more restrooms, etc.
6) top of 300 supports a catwalk structure for lights and scoreboard.
7) new roof is an externally supported cantilever roof allowing for larger concourse area and allows for escalators to 300s so fans can walk down to seats.
8) do whatever is needed for ticket office and offices and storerooms in additional footprint under new roof area.
I do think that, ultimately, we'd be better off building new and utilizing the current RAC for other purposes.
But we should be ably to do this in one year. Make a deal with teh Big Ten where we play only road games for one year with a good vast majority share of the revenue from outer home games played at Big Ten schools venues. They should all jump on that offer, right? Extra home games with advantage if not extra money.. it would be like we rent out all their venues. But we'd have to make that 1-year build work.
Differences in home court advantage from the particulars of our stadium are miniscule.Winning equals cash flow.
Huge home court advantage = Winning
There is a lot to this ….the courtside seats are more empty Than you think….The North Carolina guy is right. If the focus is mostly on luxury we’re going to be disappointed with the end result. As far as catering to the celebs and big donors… look at what we have today with court side seats. I sit in row A in the 100 section and unless it’s a huge game, the big wig seats one row in front of me are:
A - often empty
B - when occupied the folks wear anything but Rutgers gear
C - rarely participate in any cheers or crowd activities
D - arrive late and leave early
E - talk and don’t pay attention to the game
F - linger well into the second half eating chicken fingers and cheap beer in the hospitality area
E - are often Not RU fans and often not even true hoops fans
OF COURSE there are exceptions (give me Todd Frazier every game), but the bottom line is IF YOU WANT TO STERILIZE AND NEUTRALIZE the great JMA/RAC atmosphere we all crave, then go heavy on the transient “luxury“ seeking fans.