Rutgers launching ‘Democracy Lab’ to battle disinformation, inspire future voters
The nonpartisan Democracy Lab will launch in January, funded by two high-profile philanthropists.
Rutgers launching ‘Democracy Lab’ to battle disinformation, inspire future voters
- Thread starter Tango Two
- Start date
"Disinformation" as currently pimped is usually the fig leaf the oppressive censors hide behind.
If a person says "carbon dioxide is plant food and not a pollutant" that will be called dis/mis information. Its pretty easy to see the psyop if you're honest. DEI/CRT/ESL are part of the same assault.
INSTRUCTING ANIMOSITY:
HOW DEI PEDAGOGY PRODUCES
THE HOSTILE ATTRIBUTION BIAS
"Taken in its entirety, this research demonstrates a pressing need for data-driven pressure testing of DEI
interventions to examine potential harms. In spite of the serious consequences we outline above, DEI
offerings have no independent, scientific review board for objective evaluation and no standards of
transparency for the materials themselves. Offerings at major corporations for example, were nearly
impossible to collect because these materials are not publicly available, and thus the full implications and
spread of potentially harmful content is currently impossible to examine.
This research raises critical questions about how many individuals, as a result of these programs, have
experienced undue duress, social ostracization, or even termination of employment. The hostile attribution
bias revealed in NCRI’s study appears readily transmissible by the DEI pedagogy above, much of which is
inserted into recommended or mandatory readings and trainings that are widely adopted at present. This
suggests the potential for a far broader scope of harm than previously considered, underscoring the
urgency of rigorous evaluation of anti-oppressive, DEI interventions to identify unintended and damaging
consequences, and, ultimately, to prevent them"
If a person says "carbon dioxide is plant food and not a pollutant" that will be called dis/mis information. Its pretty easy to see the psyop if you're honest. DEI/CRT/ESL are part of the same assault.
INSTRUCTING ANIMOSITY:
HOW DEI PEDAGOGY PRODUCES
THE HOSTILE ATTRIBUTION BIAS
"Taken in its entirety, this research demonstrates a pressing need for data-driven pressure testing of DEI
interventions to examine potential harms. In spite of the serious consequences we outline above, DEI
offerings have no independent, scientific review board for objective evaluation and no standards of
transparency for the materials themselves. Offerings at major corporations for example, were nearly
impossible to collect because these materials are not publicly available, and thus the full implications and
spread of potentially harmful content is currently impossible to examine.
This research raises critical questions about how many individuals, as a result of these programs, have
experienced undue duress, social ostracization, or even termination of employment. The hostile attribution
bias revealed in NCRI’s study appears readily transmissible by the DEI pedagogy above, much of which is
inserted into recommended or mandatory readings and trainings that are widely adopted at present. This
suggests the potential for a far broader scope of harm than previously considered, underscoring the
urgency of rigorous evaluation of anti-oppressive, DEI interventions to identify unintended and damaging
consequences, and, ultimately, to prevent them"
Why Was This Groundbreaking Study on DEI Silenced?
Two leading media organizations abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that went against their narrative.
www.realityslaststand.com
"In a stunning series of events, two leading media organizations—The New York Times and Bloomberg—abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that raises serious concerns about the psychological impacts of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) pedagogy. The study, conducted by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) in collaboration with Rutgers University, found that certain DEI practices could induce hostility, increase authoritarian tendencies, and foster agreement with extreme rhetoric. With billions of dollars invested annually in these initiatives, the public has a right to know if such programs—heralded as effective moral solutions to bigotry and hate—might instead be fueling the very problems they claim to solve."
Two leading media organizations abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that went against their narrative.
Why Was This Groundbreaking Study on DEI Silenced?
Two leading media organizations abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that went against their narrative.
www.realityslaststand.com
"In a stunning series of events, two leading media organizations—The New York Times and Bloomberg—abruptly shelved coverage of a groundbreaking study that raises serious concerns about the psychological impacts of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) pedagogy. The study, conducted by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) in collaboration with Rutgers University, found that certain DEI practices could induce hostility, increase authoritarian tendencies, and foster agreement with extreme rhetoric. With billions of dollars invested annually in these initiatives, the public has a right to know if such programs—heralded as effective moral solutions to bigotry and hate—might instead be fueling the very problems they claim to solve."
Last edited:
