Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Corey has been working after practices and late nights trying to correct his mechanics.
He's too gifted a scorer to be like this all season. His offense will click sooner rather than later
Corey has been working after practices and late nights trying to correct his mechanics.
He's too gifted a scorer to be like this all season. His offense will click sooner rather than later
This is my only real explanation, too. He bulked up and is still feeling out how to shoot with his new frame and arm strength. It's interesting that some of the best shooters in the world have leaner arms, relatively speaking, like steph curry. I bet sanders could hold his own against curry in an arm wrestling match, but that doesn't help him shoot.Two things here
1.) Part of the TEAM's percentage will go up as time goes on in a new offense on learning WHEN and WHERE the higher percentage shot will come from....in a new offense
2;) There are SOME guys that "temporarily" lose their shooting "feel" when they really hit the upper body weights hard. From what I see of Corey's shooting form, even off the bounce, I think Corey may be one of those guys...and that will come around with repetition
Corey has been working after practices and late nights trying to correct his mechanics.
He's too gifted a scorer to be like this all season. His offense will click sooner rather than later
I don't think it's an accident that Corey is leading the team in minutes for an HC who rations minutes quite soundly. His shooting is certainly off to start the season but a 9ppg/5apg/4rpg start from a PG is not awful. Especially for a team that doesn't shoot particularly well so you know his assists aren't cheap.
In my opinion, Corey has the opportunity to improve the most under Coach P, and his minutes played thus far show Coach P might feel the same.
Bad start, or not. The kid needs to know who he is, and an above the arch shooter is not it. He needs to understand what strength's he does have, speed, quickness, and passing IQ. His shot is, going to the basket, and the 10/12 shot.
You can sit through an entire Rutgers game and not see a mid-range jump shot. It is all layups and threes. Williams hit one against Morgan, and I wish he would find room to shoot more. Corey too.
Two things here
1.) Part of the TEAM's percentage will go up as time goes on in a new offense on learning WHEN and WHERE the higher percentage shot will come from....in a new offense
2;) There are SOME guys that "temporarily" lose their shooting "feel" when they really hit the upper body weights hard. From what I see of Corey's shooting form, even off the bounce, I think Corey may be one of those guys...and that will come around with repetition
You can sit through an entire Rutgers game and not see a mid-range jump shot. It is all layups and threes. Williams hit one against Morgan, and I wish he would find room to shoot more. Corey too.
that's basketball in general. I only watch college basketball, but how many times do you see a player take it right to the rim with a defender much taller, planted 4 feet from the basket. I never see a pull up 10 footer which should be a 80% shot. It's unfortunate
The mid range shot is there for Deshawn, CJ, and Candido every game at the foul line or elbow. They can all make it and have to shoot it more.You can sit through an entire Rutgers game and not see a mid-range jump shot. It is all layups and threes. Williams hit one against Morgan, and I wish he would find room to shoot more. Corey too.
All the NBA analytics say a mid range shot is a bad shot. Does that apply to college? Not sure. But its a "lost art" because the shot doesn't make sense analytically speaking. It's like the stolen base in baseball.
Is it a bad shot because people are bad at doing it? Jeff Malone from your neck of the woods was good at it 20+ years ago.
No doubt any shot from 12-19 feet is bad. Taking a 7 footer vs. a contested shot at the rim is a different story.
I don't claim to be an expert in NBA analytics but the philosophy seems to be the % of makes for the mid range jump shot v. the % of makes for a three pointer (with its "extra point bonus") gives a clear indication that a team should be taking more three point shots and less mid range jump shots.
I believe these analytics have led to the pace and space offenses we see with the need for a "stretch 4". How it applies to CBB (which imo is very different) I can't say. But I do know at a high level that is the analytic theory.
With one little caveat, that is driving to the hole into the trees could also result in a rejection and fast break the other way or a charge on our player. That would be a trip with 0 points and fouls on us or a -2 if they have a run out.Also curious how the likelihood of drawing a foul by attacking plays in. You may make a 2 point shot from 8 feet a certain percentage of the time... but if you drive, there are a few results: 1) you still make 2 points, 2) you make 2 points plus the opportunity for a 3rd (and add a foul to your opponent), 3) you make 0 points but have the opportunity for 2 pts (lower likelihood at 2 pts, but also add foul to opponent), 4) you make 0 points. I wonder if you added all that up how it would out compared to attempting the 8 foot shot?
With one little caveat, that is driving to the hole into the trees could also result in a rejection and fast break the other way or a charge on our player. That would be a trip with 0 points and fouls on us or a -2 if they have a run out.
Bad start, or not. The kid needs to know who he is, and an above the arch shooter is not it. He needs to understand what strength's he does have, speed, quickness, and passing IQ. His shot is, going to the basket, and the 10/12 shot.
I understand your concern, but any team that depends on the 3 to win games, will surely lose more, than win. And, when you are as inept on Offense as RU, concentration on the strengths of the team(defense & rebounding), as opposed to trying and improve a weakness, which won't eclipse other teams abilities, is paramount.He needs to be able to hit the above the arch shot if we're going to win games.
The end result of trading baskets with the opponent making more 3s than you, and not hitting your 3 point shots is the same:
Your team loses.
Fixing that paradigm is the most important thing we can do.
He doesn't square up. He leads with his right shoulder. I know he always shot like that but that needs to be corrected.