ADVERTISEMENT

Unconfirmed rumor Schiano on the clock

Keep Schiano away from Rutgers. He's an average to below average coach and Rutgers has direct experience.

College football's KING of Soft and Easy OOC schedules
28-48 in the Big East
12 years on Rutgers payroll
68-67 overall record
ZERO BCS games
ZERO conference championships
His 'defense' gave up 69 points to Cincinnati in 2010

Fired after two seasons at TB for being a below average coach there.

Let Schiano coach at a program that matches his ability... Monmouth College, Widener University, etc.
Breakdown the first 6 years versus the second 6 years.
 
Why should I trust Greg Brown to make the right decision here?
Because he a graduate and one of the most successful alums who donates his free time and lots of money to a university he loves. He doesn't need to do any of that. He could donate his time to some global relief organization and not deal with people like you questioning his loyalty/capabilities.
 
We could do a lot worse than a guy likes schiano that already knows our crazy NJ culture
 
Remember when Illinois, a B1G team could not cross the 50 against a Greg Schiano defense?

That Illinois team went 2-10 and lost to Syracuse and Ohio U (not OSU) at home.

BE: 7-27 in the first 5 years, 21-21 over the following 6.

ALL: 19-39 in the first 5 years, 49-28 over the following 6.

Against a neutered Big East and national powers Norfolk State, Howard, Tulane, UNH, and NC Central.
 
Apparently he was so scared of playing good teams that he escaped to the NFL right?
Hey, his scheduling record is his scheduling record. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with history.

In any event, based on how things worked out in Tampa, seems like maybe he should've stuck w/scheduling cupcakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mal359
That Illinois team went 2-10 and lost to Syracuse and Ohio U (not OSU) at home.



Against a neutered Big East and national powers Norfolk State, Howard, Tulane, UNH, and NC Central.

What about Michigan St.?
 
That Illinois team went 2-10 and lost to Syracuse and Ohio U (not OSU) at home.



Against a neutered Big East and national powers Norfolk State, Howard, Tulane, UNH, and NC Central.
The Illini beat us one year I think.
 
What about Michigan St.?

That was 2004. I think G-RUnit was referring to 2006.

MSU was also garbage in 2006; also going 1-7 in conference play.

2004 was also the year of the UNH dud, so I think that accomplishment is effectively invalidated.
 
Because he a graduate and one of the most successful alums who donates his free time and lots of money to a university he loves. He doesn't need to do any of that. He could donate his time to some global relief organization and not deal with people like you questioning his loyalty/capabilities.

lkrwtf.gif


Wow.

And at what point did I "question his loyalty" or how much he donates? I'll patiently wait for an answer...


OR you could just continue putting words in my mouth since that seems to be your thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MYHATINTHERING
BE: 7-27 in the first 5 years, 21-21 over the following 6.

ALL: 19-39 in the first 5 years, 49-28 over the following 6.

Schiano SCHEDULED wins. Usually only played 8 total BCS opponents. 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 were ALL 8 BCS opponents seasons. During 2009 Rutgers played TWO (2) D-1 AA opponents. Schiano was winless against West Virginia in 11 games. Good to very good coaches kick Schiano's backside.
 
Schiano gave us a program to be proud of, and laid the groundwork to be where we are today. We should be so lucky to have him back to take us to the next level.
I agree with your first sentence. And he'd be an upgrade over Flood and crew. But I don't think he can take us to the next level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MYHATINTHERING
lkrwtf.gif


Wow.

And at what point did I "question his loyalty" or how much he donates? I'll patiently wait for an answer...


OR you could just continue putting words in my mouth since that seems to be your thing.
Ha, great gif. Because you said, why should you "trust" Brown. If you don't trust someone, then you are either questioning his loyalty or his capabilities or both. I was referring more to trust from a loyalty perspective while you may have been focused on the capabilities side. I used the donation point to provide evidence of his loyalty to the university and a reason he could be trusted. It is possible that I misinterpreted your post. Either way, who gives a *(*t. Let move on to bigger and better things with a new admin.
 
One would hope that HCGS would recruit better in the B1G and therefore the outcome would be different this time. I give this a 70% probability.
 
Correct. Despite the most epic Leonard Leap EVER!!!, we managed to blow a huge lead at Illinois in '04 or '05. I long-ago decided to remember the leap and forget the rest of the afternoon.
yes, that was a thing of beauty, Leonard and Rice...the good old days
 
Too funny 49-28 is not an arguable fact.

But as even flood was defended you cant stop biased or stupid.
 
Too funny 49-28 is not an arguable fact.

But as even flood was defended you cant stop biased or stupid.

Can 28-48 in the Big East be argued? What about no wins against WVU? No conference titles?

Where did I ever support Flood?
 
1. The guy who turned around the worst football program in history.
2. The guy who gave it it's branding and identity.
3. Helped push for facility upgrades and stadium expansion.
4. Put countless of players in the NFL with his preparation.
5. Became an NFL coach and will be sitting in a kid's living room with this fact in hand on the recruiting trail.
6. Will at the very least make us competitive and steer the ship right. Better bowl appearances even if it's not the Rose Bowl in the first few years.


Nah, I don't want that guy.
 
One would hope that HCGS would recruit better in the B1G and therefore the outcome would be different this time. I give this a 70% probability.
I'd say more like 50/50. GS was a fantastic program builder and a great defensive mind. After that, I'm not seeing a whole lot of greatness. We're playing in an incredibly tough sub-division of one of the best football conferences in the country. We're going to need some greatness or we're going to continue to be mediocre.

I think we need to either pony up and spend $10M for a huge name (almost no chance of this I'm afraid) or we should do our homework and hire an up-and-comer w/a proven track record of winning against tougher competition at the level they've coached so far.

I don't actually have anything against Schiano other than that I think he had his chance and I'd rather not go down that route again. I see Golden and Cristobal as similar situations to Schiano; they had their chance and one needs to make excuses for their records in order to hire them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1
Keep Schiano away from Rutgers. He's an average to below average coach and Rutgers has direct experience.

College football's KING of Soft and Easy OOC schedules
28-48 in the Big East
12 years on Rutgers payroll
68-67 overall record
ZERO BCS games
ZERO conference championships
His 'defense' gave up 69 points to Cincinnati in 2010

Fired after two seasons at TB for being a below average coach there.

Let Schiano coach at a program that matches his ability... Monmouth College, Widener University, etc.

Compare that to the Pre-Schiano years.

He built the program from the worst program in Div. 1 to relevant to B1G. There is no B1G without Schiano. In 5 years when Rutgers is bringing in 40 million per year in B1G money....they should send Schiano his finders fee.
 
Last edited:
I'd say more like 50/50. GS was a fantastic program builder and a great defensive mind. After that, I'm not seeing a whole lot of greatness. We're playing in an incredibly tough sub-division of one of the best football conferences in the country. We're going to need some greatness or we're going to continue to be mediocre.

I think we need to either pony up and spend $10M for a huge name (almost no chance of this I'm afraid) or we should do our homework and hire an up-and-comer w/a proven track record of winning against tougher competition at the level they've coached so far.

I don't actually have anything against Schiano other than that I think he had his chance and I'd rather not go down that route again. I see Golden and Cristobal as similar situations to Schiano; they had their chance and one needs to make excuses for their records in order to hire them.
But with Chuck as DC nobody would score on us (0.5%)
 
Ha, great gif. Because you said, why should you "trust" Brown. If you don't trust someone, then you are either questioning his loyalty or his capabilities or both. I was referring more to trust from a loyalty perspective while you may have been focused on the capabilities side. I used the donation point to provide evidence of his loyalty to the university and a reason he could be trusted. It is possible that I misinterpreted your post. Either way, who gives a *(*t. Let move on to bigger and better things with a new admin.

stop.gif
Well I did not intend to doubt his loyalty as i'm aware hes quite the donor and Alum. But outside of that i didn't know if he had any experience with these types of decisions since other posters were stating that he's the mastermind behind all of this, that's all. Not that it matters..


Very well then. Let us watch the offseason madness unfold.
[cheers]
 
Using the first few years post shea just shows bias. Ignoring the last years confirms it. Has nothing to do w flood and you misunderstand analogy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT