Breakdown the first 6 years versus the second 6 years.Keep Schiano away from Rutgers. He's an average to below average coach and Rutgers has direct experience.
College football's KING of Soft and Easy OOC schedules
28-48 in the Big East
12 years on Rutgers payroll
68-67 overall record
ZERO BCS games
ZERO conference championships
His 'defense' gave up 69 points to Cincinnati in 2010
Fired after two seasons at TB for being a below average coach there.
Let Schiano coach at a program that matches his ability... Monmouth College, Widener University, etc.
How's Schiano going to schedule cupcakes if we have to play 9 Big Ten teams each season starting next season?
Because he a graduate and one of the most successful alums who donates his free time and lots of money to a university he loves. He doesn't need to do any of that. He could donate his time to some global relief organization and not deal with people like you questioning his loyalty/capabilities.Why should I trust Greg Brown to make the right decision here?
28-48 in the Big East.
28-48 in the Big East.
And after the Terry Shea muck was cleaned out, how did he do? Welcome back!
BE: 7-27 in the first 5 years, 21-21 over the following 6.28-48 in the Big East.
Sorry but I am looking for much more than respectability and I hope others are too.
Remember when Illinois, a B1G team could not cross the 50 against a Greg Schiano defense?
BE: 7-27 in the first 5 years, 21-21 over the following 6.
ALL: 19-39 in the first 5 years, 49-28 over the following 6.
Hey, his scheduling record is his scheduling record. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with history.Apparently he was so scared of playing good teams that he escaped to the NFL right?
That Illinois team went 2-10 and lost to Syracuse and Ohio U (not OSU) at home.
Against a neutered Big East and national powers Norfolk State, Howard, Tulane, UNH, and NC Central.
The Illini beat us one year I think.That Illinois team went 2-10 and lost to Syracuse and Ohio U (not OSU) at home.
Against a neutered Big East and national powers Norfolk State, Howard, Tulane, UNH, and NC Central.
What about Michigan St.?
Because he a graduate and one of the most successful alums who donates his free time and lots of money to a university he loves. He doesn't need to do any of that. He could donate his time to some global relief organization and not deal with people like you questioning his loyalty/capabilities.
BE: 7-27 in the first 5 years, 21-21 over the following 6.
ALL: 19-39 in the first 5 years, 49-28 over the following 6.
I agree with your first sentence. And he'd be an upgrade over Flood and crew. But I don't think he can take us to the next level.Schiano gave us a program to be proud of, and laid the groundwork to be where we are today. We should be so lucky to have him back to take us to the next level.
Ha, great gif. Because you said, why should you "trust" Brown. If you don't trust someone, then you are either questioning his loyalty or his capabilities or both. I was referring more to trust from a loyalty perspective while you may have been focused on the capabilities side. I used the donation point to provide evidence of his loyalty to the university and a reason he could be trusted. It is possible that I misinterpreted your post. Either way, who gives a *(*t. Let move on to bigger and better things with a new admin.![]()
Wow.
And at what point did I "question his loyalty" or how much he donates? I'll patiently wait for an answer...
OR you could just continue putting words in my mouth since that seems to be your thing.
U do realize he was 2-20 his first 2 years when he took over a program that was close to extinction?28-48 in the Big East.
Correct. Despite the most epic Leonard Leap EVER!!!, we managed to blow a huge lead at Illinois in '04 or '05. I long-ago decided to remember the leap and forget the rest of the afternoon.The Illini beat us one year I think.
yes, that was a thing of beauty, Leonard and Rice...the good old daysCorrect. Despite the most epic Leonard Leap EVER!!!, we managed to blow a huge lead at Illinois in '04 or '05. I long-ago decided to remember the leap and forget the rest of the afternoon.
Ok still below .500, well done.U do realize he was 2-20 his first 2 years when he took over a program that was close to extinction?
Too funny 49-28 is not an arguable fact.
But as even flood was defended you cant stop biased or stupid.
I'd say more like 50/50. GS was a fantastic program builder and a great defensive mind. After that, I'm not seeing a whole lot of greatness. We're playing in an incredibly tough sub-division of one of the best football conferences in the country. We're going to need some greatness or we're going to continue to be mediocre.One would hope that HCGS would recruit better in the B1G and therefore the outcome would be different this time. I give this a 70% probability.
Keep Schiano away from Rutgers. He's an average to below average coach and Rutgers has direct experience.
College football's KING of Soft and Easy OOC schedules
28-48 in the Big East
12 years on Rutgers payroll
68-67 overall record
ZERO BCS games
ZERO conference championships
His 'defense' gave up 69 points to Cincinnati in 2010
Fired after two seasons at TB for being a below average coach there.
Let Schiano coach at a program that matches his ability... Monmouth College, Widener University, etc.
But with Chuck as DC nobody would score on us (0.5%)I'd say more like 50/50. GS was a fantastic program builder and a great defensive mind. After that, I'm not seeing a whole lot of greatness. We're playing in an incredibly tough sub-division of one of the best football conferences in the country. We're going to need some greatness or we're going to continue to be mediocre.
I think we need to either pony up and spend $10M for a huge name (almost no chance of this I'm afraid) or we should do our homework and hire an up-and-comer w/a proven track record of winning against tougher competition at the level they've coached so far.
I don't actually have anything against Schiano other than that I think he had his chance and I'd rather not go down that route again. I see Golden and Cristobal as similar situations to Schiano; they had their chance and one needs to make excuses for their records in order to hire them.
Ha, great gif. Because you said, why should you "trust" Brown. If you don't trust someone, then you are either questioning his loyalty or his capabilities or both. I was referring more to trust from a loyalty perspective while you may have been focused on the capabilities side. I used the donation point to provide evidence of his loyalty to the university and a reason he could be trusted. It is possible that I misinterpreted your post. Either way, who gives a *(*t. Let move on to bigger and better things with a new admin.