Keep Chopping was coined by Schiano in the beginning of 2005.Exactly. What came first, chopping or winning? I don’t remember chop becoming a think until 2006.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/11/AR2006111100499.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep Chopping was coined by Schiano in the beginning of 2005.Exactly. What came first, chopping or winning? I don’t remember chop becoming a think until 2006.
Forgot how awesome Schiano did those first few years too. You and Al are agenda posters (with Al also having a chronic need for attention) so there’s no point in even trying to have an actual discussion. You’ll just filter out whatever doesn’t support your stance as if it doesn’t exist. The fact that y’all are basically insinuating that Franklin ‘invented’ PSU’s winning imagine (and Al continues to troll with asinine Flood arguments) is f’n hysterical.
Joe P.
Schiano landed Brian Leonard those first few years. He also recruited Florida to substantially improve overall team speed. Though the results weren't there, one could easily see that the talent level was increasing substantially, as his recruiting got better each year. In contrast, our recruiting slipped from last year to this year.
if one day hoping that paying for my season tickets doesnt feel like throwing money down a hole, then yeah, that's my agenda. It's felt that way for the last three years. That's why I want more to be done to improve the quality of the product.Anything else is absurd.
No one ever said Franklin invented Penn States winning image. But what he has done is remade the Penn State program in his own image, and has had the program competing at a high level the past two years, while running a disciplined program, and recruiting at an elite level. For that he has my respect.
I don’t think people fully realize what it will take for RU football to get anywhere near the top of the BIG. Ash’s vision was stated from his initial press conference. It may take 5-10 years (or longer) before we see consistent winning. It’s a major operation to change internal culture and external perception. When you are in a division more difficult than the Big East circa 2001, it’s not a simple fix. The BIGs top schools are fine tuned machines of vast wealth, resources and decades of reputation. For example, the Michigan athletics department runs a SURPLUS after expenses. This allows for the financial freedom that they have. For this program (RU), whom recently, partially committed to “ big time” athletics, it is decades behind the others in its conference, especially the BIG east. The program where it stands now, on all levels is still trying to transition from what it was allowed to do. Which would be a top five AAC or the post, redesigned Big east, team. The argument that RU should be showing better results by now is a futile arguement. The Scenarios are totally different than what others are comparing to (mid 2000s RU football). The ascension from pre to post big east realignment and the AAC to BIG is vastly different, on all accounts.
I don’t think people fully realize what it will take for RU football to get anywhere near the top of the BIG. Ash’s vision was stated from his initial press conference. It may take 5-10 years (or longer) before we see consistent winning. It’s a major operation to change internal culture and external perception. When you are in a division more difficult than the Big East circa 2001, it’s not a simple fix. The BIGs top schools are fine tuned machines of vast wealth, resources and decades of reputation. For example, the Michigan athletics department runs a SURPLUS after expenses. This allows for the financial freedom that they have. For this program (RU), whom recently, partially committed to “ big time” athletics, it is decades behind the others in its conference, especially the BIG east. The program where it stands now, on all levels is still trying to transition from what it was allowed to do. Which would be a top five AAC or the post, redesigned Big east, team. The argument that RU should be showing better results by now is a futile arguement. The Scenarios are totally different than what others are comparing to (mid 2000s RU football). The ascension from pre to post big east realignment and the AAC to BIG is vastly different, on all accounts, given the program’s resources, reputation, etc., relative to its competitors.
I support Ash just on the basis of trying to take on this Herculean task, given the constraints. And he KNOWS what it takes to compete in the BIG; he has lived it. It was/is a huge risk for him, and I acknowledge that.
Schiano landed Brian Leonard those first few years. He also recruited Florida to substantially improve overall team speed. Though the results weren't there, one could easily see that the talent level was increasing substantially, as his recruiting got better each year. In contrast, our recruiting slipped from last year to this year.
if one day hoping that paying for my season tickets doesnt feel like throwing money down a hole, then yeah, that's my agenda. It's felt that way for the last three years. That's why I want more to be done to improve the quality of the product.Anything else is absurd.
No one ever said Franklin invented Penn States winning image. But what he has done is remade the Penn State program in his own image, and has had the program competing at a high level the past two years, while running a disciplined program, and recruiting at an elite level. For that he has my respect.
I'm not hung up on being at the top of the Big 10.
I'm just tired of seeing lithless efforts on a weekly basis against teams that on paper, RU should be competitive with. I was fine with giving Ash an extension until the Indiana game where it looked like no one wanted to be there.
That's on the coaching staff fullstop. After that pathetic effort, any talks of an extension should've been shelved until the following year.
I'm not hung up on being at the top of the Big 10.
I'm just tired of seeing lithless efforts on a weekly basis against teams that on paper, RU should be competitive with. I was fine with giving Ash an extension until the Indiana game where it looked like no one wanted to be there.
That's on the coaching staff fullstop. After that pathetic effort, any talks of an extension should've been shelved until the following year.
Right.No doubt Indiana was a bad game, but what about Maryland, Purdue and Illinois?
Same thing going on with Durkin in Maryland.
It took Franklin that many years at Penn State with the addition of Moorhead.
Can you give it a rest, please. We get your point. You don't like Ash.
Right.
And what about Schiano's New Hampshire and Buffalo losses?
New Hampshire was year 4.
Buffalo- lost 34-11 in year 2. And getting blown out by 1-11 Army 44-0?
But Greg was a genius and a perfect coach.
In a very bizarre thread, the most bizarre thing of all is Al. Al who would write novels explaining how RU was going to beat teams they had zero chance of beating. Al who would swear RU was going to win the NC when most knew a 7 win season was ambitious. Al who many would cringe when they opened one of his posts because the declarations made could never be met. Now, with a coach who is still in the process of cleaning up the mess he inherited, after TWO Years, Al has become like the rest of the Ashbashers. What's up with that?
If I remember correctly, Terry Shea honoring Brian’s brothers Rutgers scholarship after he suffered a severe leg injury (during his senior year) played a big part in his coming hereSchiano landed Brian Leonard those first few years. He also recruited Florida to substantially improve overall team speed. Though the results weren't there, one could easily see that the talent level was increasing substantially, as his recruiting got better each year. In contrast, our recruiting slipped from last year to this year.
if one day hoping that paying for my season tickets doesnt feel like throwing money down a hole, then yeah, that's my agenda. It's felt that way for the last three years. That's why I want more to be done to improve the quality of the product.Anything else is absurd.
No one ever said Franklin invented Penn States winning image. But what he has done is remade the Penn State program in his own image, and has had the program competing at a high level the past two years, while running a disciplined program, and recruiting at an elite level. For that he has my respect.
If I remember correctly, Terry Shea honoring Brian’s brothers Rutgers scholarship after he suffered a severe leg injury (during his senior year) played a big part in his coming here
Very true. Flood caught the biggest break ever with Pedd State and couldn't capitalize. Hiring Flood was worse than trading Babe Ruth, but I digress.I’m a big fan of Schiano. That being said, he caught some key breaks that often go overlooked:
-Shea honoring Nate Leonard’s scholly when cuse didn’t (Brian Leonard)
-Pasquiloni getting fired (Rice, Greene)
-shifting in the BE
-Wanny getting fired a Pitt (Hafley, Nova, a number of ‘12 recruits that the former Pitt coaches helped with)
Joe P.
Very true. Flood caught the biggest break ever with Pedd State and couldn't capitalize. Hiring Flood was worse than trading Babe Ruth, but I digress.
Right.
And what about Schiano's New Hampshire and Buffalo losses?
New Hampshire was year 4.
Buffalo- lost 34-11 in year 2. [EDIT- RU beat Army]
But Greg was a genius and a perfect coach.
Nobody said Schiano was the perfect coach. And he lost his fair share too. But Schiano and Ash did not start at the same spot. That's just a myth.
Definitely not at the same spot, though sometimes Ash’s difficulties are underscored a bit. Schiano took a superfund site and turned it into moderately valuable property. Ash now has to take that moderately valuable property that the last owner trashed a bit and turn into something to compete with the Rockefellers and Vanderbilts.
Joe P.
Agreed, analogies are tough, but that's not bad.Good analogy. I can agree with that.
Schiano landed Brian Leonard those first few years. He also recruited Florida to substantially improve overall team speed. Though the results weren't there, one could easily see that the talent level was increasing substantially, as his recruiting got better each year. In contrast, our recruiting slipped from last year to this year.
if one day hoping that paying for my season tickets doesnt feel like throwing money down a hole, then yeah, that's my agenda. It's felt that way for the last three years. That's why I want more to be done to improve the quality of the product.Anything else is absurd.
No one ever said Franklin invented Penn States winning image. But what he has done is remade the Penn State program in his own image, and has had the program competing at a high level the past two years, while running a disciplined program, and recruiting at an elite level. For that he has my respect.
I don’t think people fully realize what it will take for RU football to get anywhere near the top of the BIG. Ash’s vision was stated from his initial press conference. It may take 5-10 years (or longer) before we see consistent winning. It’s a major operation to change internal culture and external perception. When you are in a division more difficult than the Big East circa 2001, it’s not a simple fix. The BIGs top schools are fine tuned machines of vast wealth, resources and decades of reputation. For example, the Michigan athletics department runs a SURPLUS after expenses. This allows for the financial freedom that they have. For this program (RU), whom recently, partially committed to “ big time” athletics, it is decades behind the others in its conference, especially the BIG east. The program where it stands now, on all levels is still trying to transition from what it was allowed to do. Which would be a top five AAC or the post, redesigned Big east, team. The argument that RU should be showing better results by now is a futile arguement. The Scenarios are totally different than what others are comparing to (mid 2000s RU football). The ascension from pre to post big east realignment and the AAC to BIG is vastly different, on all accounts, given the program’s resources, reputation, etc., relative to its competitors.
I support Ash just on the basis of trying to take on this Herculean task, given the constraints. And he KNOWS what it takes to compete in the BIG; he has lived it. It was/is a huge risk for him, and I acknowledge that.
He's lucid again, and I love it.
Ash never built a B1G program. He was on the staff for a few years. We are all well aware of the culture change and we've discussed it ad nauseum. Everyone knows that is Ash's main idea/plan/goal..but so far it isn't showing results YET. Will it? I don't know. But part of changing the culture and creating a competitive program should be getting better Jimmie's and Joe's in the building. recruiting has not been great and guys like Bailey have proven to have similar problems to other kids we have seen. So I question how far this "culture" thing goes with just bland uniforms, mantras, and better eating. It is the foundation, sure. But is it the be all end all of the program being competitive?
In 2014 we went bowling and won, had a winning season, and played ok with our division aside from a team or two. That was with the "AAC program" and without the benefit of 2 years of Ash's culture....so something is not quite computing. Yes it was a down year, but you are saying no matter what, we need 10 years to even do that again...be competitive and have a winning season.
I've said from the beginning, Ash's perception of RU was that of a typical "big time" midwestern guy who doesn't know much or respect much about RU or northeastern football. HE said we were such a piece of crap that he had to change the culture. But maybe his culture ain't what is gonna work here.
We will see. No, I don't think Ash needs 10 years for us to have an inkling if he will get it done or not.
No doubt Indiana was a bad game, but what about Maryland, Purdue and Illinois?
I don’t think people fully realize what it will take for RU football to get anywhere near the top of the BIG. Ash’s vision was stated from his initial press conference. It may take 5-10 years (or longer) before we see consistent winning. It’s a major operation to change internal culture and external perception. When you are in a division more difficult than the Big East circa 2001, it’s not a simple fix. The BIGs top schools are fine tuned machines of vast wealth, resources and decades of reputation. For example, the Michigan athletics department runs a SURPLUS after expenses. This allows for the financial freedom that they have. For this program (RU), whom recently, partially committed to “ big time” athletics, it is decades behind the others in its conference, especially the BIG east. The program where it stands now, on all levels is still trying to transition from what it was allowed to do. Which would be a top five AAC or the post, redesigned Big east, team. The argument that RU should be showing better results by now is a futile arguement. The Scenarios are totally different than what others are comparing to (mid 2000s RU football). The ascension from pre to post big east realignment and the AAC to BIG is vastly different, on all accounts, given the program’s resources, reputation, etc., relative to its competitors.
I support Ash just on the basis of trying to take on this Herculean task, given the constraints. And he KNOWS what it takes to compete in the BIG; he has lived it. It was/is a huge risk for him, and I acknowledge that.
Problem is all the good will that was achieved with those three wins were lost by the terrible last two, Indiana and MSU getting out scored 81-7
It is THE reason he came. When pp came calling, Brian only asked one questionIf I remember correctly, Terry Shea honoring Brian’s brothers Rutgers scholarship after he suffered a severe leg injury (during his senior year) played a big part in his coming here
Great post but don’t even bother. They ‘hey look at me’ crew that just wants to see themselves post won’t even acknowledge it in a way that makes any sense.
Joe P.
You see you say that but it’s a completely default answer and not even looking at the coach objectively.... I’m not disputing the monumental task ash had when he took over the program, I’m questioning his ability as the right man for the job. What exactly have you seen in the 2 years in the field and with recruiting taking the step backwards it did that makes you believe ash is the guy? I get the whole, ‘it’s year 2 give him time’ etc etc but you could say that about any coach honestly... I remember being done with Kyle Flood after year two and my buddies would say ‘give it time’ and well...
As I said, if we’re in a bowl game next year I will absolutely eat crow and make the statement for all to laugh at me and my lack of football knowledge, lol.
You see you say that but it’s a completely default answer and not even looking at the coach objectively.... I’m not disputing the monumental task ash had when he took over the program, I’m questioning his ability as the right man for the job. What exactly have you seen in the 2 years in the field and with recruiting taking the step backwards it did that makes you believe ash is the guy? I get the whole, ‘it’s year 2 give him time’ etc etc but you could say that about any coach honestly... I remember being done with Kyle Flood after year two and my buddies would say ‘give it time’ and well...
As I said, if we’re in a bowl game next year I will absolutely eat crow and make the statement for all to laugh at me and my lack of football knowledge, lol.
Depends on which ranking you look at:I agree with everything you wrote minus the last paragraph. I’m not disputing that it was always going to be a monumental task for anyone who took the job. My problem is with the job Ash has done since he arrived.
I have no problem with a coach setting realistic expectations and ’working harder to get better every day’ like the staff incessantly beats into the media’s head, however I believe chris ash has taken a real backseat in terms of creating excitement within the local communtity, which is ultimately the first step in getting Rutgers back into mid range, bowl eligible status consistently.
As Al pointed out, when in year 2 of a coaches tenure he lands 0 of the top 15 prospects and only 4 total in state prospects in a state as talent rich as NJ, that’s reason for major concern, particularly since although we weren’t great, we were certainly better than 2016.
Some have laughed at me for suggesting a HC Mike Houston from a little school in Virginia who is a dynamo in the coaching world whose school just signed him to a 10 year contract with a large buyout bc they know a P5 school will be calling soon.... those same fans were probably laughing at PSU when they hired a HC from a tiny football school in NYC, Fordham, named Joe Moorhead....
I believe a bowl game is the benchmark this year, 6 wins is not unreasonable with our schedule, if not please cut our losses with ash and move on
He's done some good. The defense improved. He's made some good hires on paper. Recruiting took a step back, I agree. But on paper, he's brought in some decent quarterbacks. So we'll see how this year goes. 6 wins would be great. If he goes 5-7 that wouldn't be terrible either. I can even accept 4-8 if the offense is better.
He's done some good. The defense improved. He's made some good hires on paper. Recruiting took a step back, I agree. But on paper, he's brought in some decent quarterbacks. So we'll see how this year goes. 6 wins would be great. If he goes 5-7 that wouldn't be terrible either. I can even accept 4-8 if the offense is better.
One thread at least keeps it orderly so I'd vote for that option.What is worse, too many threads on one stupid topic or one thread that should have stopped 240 posts ago?
I get what you’re saying but I have ADHD and just thinking about all of these posts gives me hives. No way I can read them all.One thread at least keeps it orderly so I'd vote for that option.