Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can’t make a solid pick by grouping Q 1+2 together. Not only the committee doesn’t do that, but they even separate Q1 into “high Q1” games (top 15 net) and weight that a lot (according to Brad Watchel on Aaron Breitman’s podcast this week) … so unless you include that metric, can’t make a clean call between these 2. I’d say they’re even otherwise, that would be the deciding factor.
Iowa St it 20th in NET. For context Ok St has 3 top 25 NET wins. Rutgers has 1.tell me Oklahoma State's high end win....I will wait here. It Iowa State on that road, in fact they swept Iowa State. Their other wins are TCU and WVU
Rutgers won at Purdue, at Northwestern, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan State, 2x Penn State, at Wisconsin. To me its pretty clear who has the better resume
also better put the overall mark which could be at 17-15 after the big 12 tourney which would be a nonstarter.
I believe we went through this last year with Oklahoma or some other school from Big 12 only one or two games above .500.
Iowa St it 20th in NET. For context Ok St has 3 top 25 NET wins. Rutgers has 1.
Indeed. Very close resumes. And ok St is not in the field at the moment.Thats not how its seperated
Ru is 2-5 in high q1 wins...5-6 q1 overall
Ok St is 1-10...6-12 q1 overall