Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said their offensive style is the most tourney ready, didn’t say Fran executes it as well as he could.Whaaat? Iowa always underperforms in the tourney . They got knocked out by a 13 seed last year . They shot their load in the BIG tourney
Trying to figure which quote is more appropriate:This is just dumb. Big Ten has a ~8% chance (this is from Bart's model. You can quibble with the exact number.. it won't change the point a lot) at the title this year. Obviously this will be different year to year but missing an 8% shot 22 times in a row is a 16% chance. It's not remarkable in the slightest.
Do believe B1G deeper than most if not all. For example Nebraska beats #7 Creighton at Creighton. 2nd worst team in league?I'm pretty sure that fans from every conference would say all these same things ("grind", many games, unsuitable and/or poor officiating, etc.) are holding them back.
I think it was just bad luck; many teams got to finals, but none won...
Had this discussion with some big east friends this week and they brought up some interesting points and curious to hear your opinions.
Their main premise was that the big ten conference as a whole is very long, big, tough and physical teams. And if youre not long big tough and physical youll get bullied in conference play. However once you get to march its more quick, fast and teams that play with pace.
Their points kinda made sense to me. What do you think?