ADVERTISEMENT

WSJ "State Colleges 'Devour' Money, And Students Foot the Bill"

mdk01

Hall of Famer
Aug 18, 2011
24,982
17,556
113
Front page lengthy article (paywall)on the spending habits of flagship schools of each of the 50 states. WSJ examined the financial statements since 2002.Some highlights:

"The nation's best-known public universities have been on an unfettered spending spree. In the past two decades they have erected new skylines of snazzy academic buildings and dorms. They poured money into big time sports programs and hired layers of administrators. Then they passed the bill along to students."

"The spending is inextricably tied to the nation's $1.6 trillion federal student debt crisis. Colleges have paid for their sprees in part by raising tuition prices leading many students to take on more debt. That means student loans served as easy financing for university projects."

"Through it all schools operated in a culture that valued unrelenting growth and prioritized raising revenue over cutting costs."

"Many university officials struggled to understand their own budgets and simply increased spending every year. Trustees demanded little accountability and often rubber what came before them. And schools inconsistently disclose what they spend, making it nearly impossible for the public to review how their tuition and tax dollars are being spent.

"Much of the increase in outlays showed up in the hiring process for administrators, faculty, coaches and finance experts the Journal's analysis found.

Among the more profligate in the article were Kentucky, Oklahoma and UConn. But there's this gem "Pennsylvania State University spent so much money that it now has a budget crisis - even though it's among the most expensive public universities in the US."

Of course, if it runs in the Star Ledger the Headline will read "Rutgers and Other State Colleges 'Devour' Money, And Students Foot the Bill"
 
Front page lengthy article (paywall)on the spending habits of flagship schools of each of the 50 states. WSJ examined the financial statements since 2002.Some highlights:

"The nation's best-known public universities have been on an unfettered spending spree. In the past two decades they have erected new skylines of snazzy academic buildings and dorms. They poured money into big time sports programs and hired layers of administrators. Then they passed the bill along to students."

"The spending is inextricably tied to the nation's $1.6 trillion federal student debt crisis. Colleges have paid for their sprees in part by raising tuition prices leading many students to take on more debt. That means student loans served as easy financing for university projects."

"Through it all schools operated in a culture that valued unrelenting growth and prioritized raising revenue over cutting costs."

"Many university officials struggled to understand their own budgets and simply increased spending every year. Trustees demanded little accountability and often rubber what came before them. And schools inconsistently disclose what they spend, making it nearly impossible for the public to review how their tuition and tax dollars are being spent.

"Much of the increase in outlays showed up in the hiring process for administrators, faculty, coaches and finance experts the Journal's analysis found.

Among the more profligate in the article were Kentucky, Oklahoma and UConn. But there's this gem "Pennsylvania State University spent so much money that it now has a budget crisis - even though it's among the most expensive public universities in the US."

Of course, if it runs in the Star Ledger the Headline will read "Rutgers and Other State Colleges 'Devour' Money, And Students Foot the Bill"
This, however, is not unique to public schools and lots of debt that people want forgiven is doubtless owed to private schools. It's a system-wide problem. I'm of the mind that capping student loans is the way to go to force universities to tighten their belts and stop building dorms with inground swimming pools and mahogany-paneled lounges.
 
This, however, is not unique to public schools and lots of debt that people want forgiven is doubtless owed to private schools. It's a system-wide problem. I'm of the mind that capping student loans is the way to go to force universities to tighten their belts and stop building dorms with inground swimming pools and mahogany-paneled lounges.

Rather than capping, I'd like to see universities accept some risk of loss on default. Right now it's low cost, risk free financing. I wonder how they would have reacted if, say, 25% of the (unconstitutional) loan forgiveness program was going to come out of their pockets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUScrew85
No doubt that the reporting exposes a very real "problem" (from the outside observer). However, schools are competing for customers just like every other industry. So, to entice students to come to/spend at their institution, they spend on fancy amenities and make it look like a country club or adult daycare. A generation (or two) of parents have been suckered into thinking that a college education - well, the kind advertised at an institution such as these - is essential for success (regardless of how that's defined). So, prices keep going up and consumers keep consuming. It's sad.

When my kid was born, our financial advisor offered to help with planning. He asked dozens of questions. In the end, he told us that we'd have to save $300k for her college education. I told him that if that's what college was going to cost, she won't go to college.
 
Last edited:
No doubt that the reporting exposes a very real "problem" (from the outside observer). However, schools are competing for customers just like every other industry. So, to entice students to come to/spend at their institution, they spend on fancy amenities and make it look like a country club or adult daycare. A generation (or two) of parents have been suckered into thinking that a college education - well, the kind advertised at an institution such as these - is essential for success (regardless of how that's defined). So, prices keep going up and consumers keep consuming. It's sad.

When my kid was born, our financial advisor offered to help with planning. He asked dozens of questions. In the end, he told us that we'd have to save $300k for her college education. I told him that if that's what college was going to cost, she won't go to college.

But the problem is outside of Purdue (the legacy of Mitch Daniels cutting costs and not raising tuition during his 8 years as University president) there is no lower cost serious 4 year alternative. Tuition, room, board and fees totaled $22,812 for residents for '23-'24. Almost worth considering an antitrust action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeantownKnight
"The nation's best-known public universities have been on an unfettered spending spree. In the past two decades they have erected new skylines of snazzy academic buildings and dorms. They poured money into big time sports programs and hired layers of administrators. Then they passed the bill along to students."


Indeed - and they performed their heists while propagandizing students about income inequality, inequity etc and shackling kids with wierdo degrees. On top of that they used adjuncts like Russian serfs . Tuition is the only thing that outpaced healthcare for yearly escalting costs

 
No doubt that the reporting exposes a very real "problem" (from the outside observer). However, schools are competing for customers just like every other industry. So, to entice students to come to/spend at their institution, they spend on fancy amenities and make it look like a country club or adult daycare. A generation (or two) of parents have been suckered into thinking that a college education - well, the kind advertised at an institution such as these - is essential for success (regardless of how that's defined). So, prices keep going up and consumers keep consuming. It's sad.

When my kid was born, our financial advisor offered to help with planning. He asked dozens of questions. In the end, he told us that we'd have to save $300k for her college education. I told him that if that's what college was going to cost, she won't go to college.
A college education greatly enhances your earning potential over a lifetime, and your lifespan. However, there's a problem when colleges are investing vast sums into things that aren't directly related to education (ie dorms and recreational stuff versus classrooms and labs) and when the dampening effect of rising prices is blunted by unlimited loans. When the price of a car gets so high that no bank will loan you $120k to buy it unless you have sh*t tons of money the prices of the car will stop going up or the car maker will simply sell fewer cars. But if unlimited loans are given out the price will just go up and up. The car maker doesn't worry about loan default, the lender does. But Uncle Sam is not a risk to go under due to bad student loans so he keeps loaning money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeantownKnight
But the problem is outside of Purdue (the legacy of Mitch Daniels cutting costs and not raising tuition during his 8 years as University president) there is no lower cost serious 4 year alternative. Tuition, room, board and fees totaled $22,812 for residents for '23-'24. Almost worth considering an antitrust action.

Purdue $22812
IU $25170

If your major/program is available at both the choice is obvious.

Rutgers $28900
Penn St $32270.

Somehow I don't think the cost of living in Appallachia in higher than New Jersey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddynyse
But the problem is outside of Purdue (the legacy of Mitch Daniels cutting costs and not raising tuition during his 8 years as University president) there is no lower cost serious 4 year alternative. Tuition, room, board and fees totaled $22,812 for residents for '23-'24. Almost worth considering an antitrust action.
This explains why Ron Harper Jr. was able to own Purdue University.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rurichdog
Purdue $22812
IU $25170

If your major/program is available at both the choice is obvious.

Rutgers $28900
Penn St $32270.

Somehow I don't think the cost of living in Appallachia in higher than New Jersey.

This explains why Ron Harper Jr. was able to own Purdue University.
I like how both of these posts “zing” in different ways.

Good job, folks.👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: mildone
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT