Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But they finished ahead of us last year.They are still coached by Woodson at the end of the day lmao.
We have beaten Indiana with guys like TJD and Ware.
They still took another L from us.But they finished ahead of us last year.
And they beat us the time before that. Just sucks when they get more talent than we do in.They still took another L from us.
I heard that there is some previous connection between Omoruyi and Rutgers.I don’t know who this is but they predicted Ballo to Indiana….and predict Cliff to….,Rutgers.
Hmmm….
Doesn't matter when your top assistant is an NIL bag. I read they have paid $3.3m on 3 transfers so far.But they finished ahead of us last year.
I don’t know who this is but they predicted Ballo to Indiana….and predict Cliff to….,Rutgers.
Hmmm….
Really? Rutgers has won like 8 or 9 of the last 11 games against IU.And they beat us the time before that. Just sucks when they get more talent than we do in.
Dominoes falling, in favor of our B1G opponents
Dude we have OWNED Indiana. It's been an amazing run of handing them endless L'sAnd they beat us the time before that. Just sucks when they get more talent than we do in.
You don’t think that could ever turn around? Obtaining more talent is one way for that to happen. Wins over Indiana for the past 4-5 years don’t have anything to do with next year.Dude we have OWNED Indiana. It's been an amazing run of handing them endless L's
Neither does your argument.You don’t think that could ever turn around? Obtaining more talent is one way for that to happen. Wins over Indiana for the past 4-5 years don’t have anything to do with next year.
So less talent is better than more talent this coming and future years? Also wins four years ago will help us win over Indiana this year? Some take you got thereNeither does your argument.
Indiana had more "talent" and has out recruited Rutgers ever year ever until this year so what are you even talking about?So less talent is better than more talent this coming and future years? Also wins four years ago will help us win over Indiana this year? Some take you got there
Cubuff is saying my argument makes no sense. All I’m saying is wins four years ago don’t assure us beating them this year. Also, I’d sure rather have higher rated talent than less rated talent. Logical no? I do hope we keep beating them but like a roulette table that’s running black for a while it does eventually change to red. Then red runs for a while and changes back. I mean it is 1-1 the last two. My whole point is them getting Ballo isn’t a good thing.Indiana had more "talent" and has out recruited Rutgers ever year ever until this year so what are you even talking about?
I guess since we are now outrecruiting IU they will finally beat us?Indiana had more "talent" and has out recruited Rutgers ever year ever until this year so what are you even talking about?
Being ranked is step one. IU usually gets the best of RU most years, except this year. Developing that talent is step two. That's something IU hasn't done and you don't acknowledge. Step three is the level of commitment of the player to get better. Rutgers has outperformed IU in the majority of these steps and that why Rutgers continues to dominate them. Step four is coaching. Pike has run circles around IU coaches. When you can figure out all of the steps, it will make more sense to you.Cubuff is saying my argument makes no sense. All I’m saying is wins four years ago don’t assure us beating them this year. Also, I’d sure rather have higher rated talent than less rated talent. Logical no? I do hope we keep beating them but like a roulette table that’s running black for a while it does eventually change to red. Then red runs for a while and changes back. I mean it is 1-1 the last two. My whole point is them getting Ballo isn’t a good thing.
Developing talent and commitment like Reiber, Agee, Palmquist (never really developed), Mag (that’s commitment), Miller, Simpson, Wolfolk, Griffiths. You’re joking.Being ranked is step one. IU usually gets the best of RU most years, except this year. Developing that talent is step two. That's something IU hasn't done and you don't acknowledge. Step three is the level of commitment of the player to get better. Rutgers has outperformed IU in the majority of these steps and that why Rutgers continues to dominate them. Step four is coaching. Pike has run circles around IU coaches. When you can figure out all of the steps, it will make more sense to you.
It's more to the game than just stars.
I just wish we could recruit top talent. I’ve heard that some schools have even gotten 2 out of the top 3 players. Maybe one day….Developing talent and commitment like Reiber, Agee, Palmquist (never really developed), Mag (that’s commitment), Miller, Simpson, Wolfolk, Griffiths. You’re joking.
I will give you that we have a better teacher and coach. Listen, I hope we win the next ten meetings with them but you know it’s really Geo, RHJ, Caleb et Al that owned IN. The last two games are 1-1. All I’m saying is I’d like to have had Ballo. You wouldn’t?
Cubuff is saying my argument makes no sense. All I’m saying is wins four years ago don’t assure us beating them this year. Also, I’d sure rather have higher rated talent than less rated talent. Logical no? I do hope we keep beating them but like a roulette table that’s running black for a while it does eventually change to red. Then red runs for a while and changes back. I mean it is 1-1 the last two. My whole point is them getting Ballo isn’t a good thing.
Rutgers went 15-17 this year and one of those wins came against IU. The score was 66-57 and this was Rutgers worst teams since Pikes first year. What doses that really say about IU? When Rutgers has less talent, only then is it competitive. Talentless teams according to your standards: Pike's first year (2016-2017) Rutgers went 1-1, last year 1-1 (2022-2023), and 1-0 this year. All without Geo, Caleb, etc. So when Rutgers has equal or better talent, Pike runs away from IU, so we should run away from IU next year. Got it.Developing talent and commitment like Reiber, Agee, Palmquist (never really developed), Mag (that’s commitment), Miller, Simpson, Wolfolk, Griffiths. You’re joking.
I will give you that we have a better teacher and coach. Listen, I hope we win the next ten meetings with them but you know it’s really Geo, RHJ, Caleb et Al that owned IN. The last two games are 1-1. All I’m saying is I’d like to have had Ballo. You wouldn’t?
So how did they finish higher than us in the standings if they suck and we’re better? No not trolling. Do I think you’re foolish that you wouldn’t want Ballo. Yes. Got it?Rutgers went 15-17 this year and one of those wins came against IU. The score was 66-57 and this was Rutgers worst teams since Pikes first year. What doses that really say about IU? When Rutgers has less talent, only then is it competitive. Talentless teams according to your standards: Pike's first year (2016-2017) Rutgers went 1-1, last year 1-1 (2022-2023), and 1-0 this year. All without Geo, Caleb, etc. So when Rutgers has equal or better talent, Pike runs away from IU, so we should run away from IU next year. Got it.
There’s. 0.0% chance Brea is here next year. UConn and Kansas are his leading schools.Pike should be all in on Carr from Wake Forest and Brea from Dayton as a 3 point shooter. Have to would love to get those 2 pieces.
They’re here one year! One year! Then we probably won’t have any five stars again. Haven’t won a game on the banks yet. But certainly keep being cocky coming off the year we just had. Or the last two years where we quit. I believe in Ace and Dylan but we don’t have a track record of good recruiting and I’m intelligent enough to realize this is a best friends/fanatics/Godfather is an asst coach anomaly. I’d like to be a perennial winner. Not someone who gets all juiced for only an incoming class after two sh*tty seasons.
What’s not how it works? I’m confused. It doesn’t always work that way. We were good in 2019-2021 and the next couple years classes 21-23 didn’t pay off.That’s not how it works. Prove you can win and winners come. So you end up a perpetual winner.
We’re getting there. We’re on the short list for several 5* targets for 2025.
Also, now that we’re winning, bball prospects are going to love the proximity to NYC ($$$$) and a winning program.
Ballo is at Indiana for 1 year & cost $1.2 million keep trollingThey’re here one year! One year! Then we probably won’t have any five stars again. Haven’t won a game on the banks yet. But certainly keep being cocky coming off the year we just had. Or the last two years where we quit. I believe in Ace and Dylan but we don’t have a track record of good recruiting and I’m intelligent enough to realize this is a best friends/fanatics/Godfather is an asst coach anomaly. I’d like to be a perennial winner. Not someone who gets all juiced for only an incoming class after two sh*tty seasons.