Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really like Norlander and Parrish but they are not bracketologists and the bracketologist they listen to (Palm at CBS) is a bad one.I just watched this.
Rutgers talk starts around 11 minutes in. I just don't understand that they think we're out of we lose to Iowa. The other bubble teams are going to lose a game too. Iowa is a damn good team. Like who is replacing us?
Dave Revsine and Andy Katz just made this exact point on BTN.I just got around to watching this and their analysis was really dumb. Norlander has said on other podcasts "nothing happens in a vacuum" but then proceeded to analyze Rutgers in a vacuum. At no point did either host think to compare them to BYU, or Indiana, or SMU, or VCU. They just read off the Quadrant numbers and the computer numbers and said "they need to beat Iowa."
It's not only beating all those tournament teams, it's doing it with all the pressure on and everyday being a do or die.
It's one thing for a mid major to catch a basketball power early in the season and win one. How about going through that gauntlet to go 6-3 just to even have a chance. That should count for something