If a company comes forward I think they would want a clause that the naming rights would transfer to a new facility if the RAC is replaced before the contract is up.
Also, what kind of exposure does the RAC provide to a company compared to Rutgers Stadium?
If RU has 6 home football games and averages 50k fans then 300k fans saw the naming rights. Plus with Ohio St, Michigan, and Penn St visiting we get national exposure.
For hoops if we have 20 home games and average 8500 fans then only 170k fans would see the naming rights. With hoops we get less nationally broadcast weekend games for the entire country to see. Since the arena is barely used outside of Rutgers events we do not have the pull of a Yum Center (Louisville, KY), a Pinnacle Bank arena (Lincoln, NB), or Wells Fargo arena (Tempe, AZ). In NJ special events would rather go to MSG (NY), Barclays Ctr (Brooklyn), Prudential Center (Newark), PNC Bank Arts Center (Holmdel), Susquehanna Bank Arena (Camden), Wells Fargo Center (Philly), or to the various venues in AC. To make it viable Rutgers would need to try and get into the outside event hosting business. Rutgers Stadium is a nice midway point between PNC Bank Arts Ctr (17k seats) and Met Life Stadium (80k seats) for concerts of the 30-45k capacity. An updated RAC probably can host winter concerts that are too small for the Pru Center (19k capacity) but bigger than the State Theater (2k capacity).