TKR Pod: Rutgers / Nebraska Recap + Greg Schiano Wisconsin Presser
The TKR Podcast crew offer their final thoughts on the loss to Nebraska and then look ahead to the Wisconsin game.
rutgers.rivals.com
About to listen, other than Blazek, who else has ties?Good breakdown.
Alec from Game of Thrones was a plus
The Wisconsin staff ties to RU was interesting
Zack Heeman, former Rutgers OL is a GA on staff.About to listen, other than Blazek, who else has ties?
About to listen, other than Blazek, who else has ties?
Please elaborate on our advantage via two-way familiarity, Mr. Sagan. Or, do you request a Mulligan on this brilliant supposition?That's pretty common that FBS staff usually know of each other I thought. I wonder how much of an advantage we get from this.
Purdue gave up 66 points to Notre Dame (Notre Dame scored 14 points against NIU in a loss and 18 points against Miami of Ohio and 31 points against Louisville) and 38 points to Oregon State (scored only 21 against San Diego State and 38 points to Idaho State).The problem I see is that Wisconsin looks to have improved a lot. The light bulb went on for them. Scoring 52 on a Purdue (i know they're not that great) is a big Oh oh for us.
Besides being the doormat of the B1G, Purdue would lose to most of the MAC teams this season.Purdue gave up 66 points to Notre Dame (Notre Dame scored 14 points against NIU in a loss and 18 points against Miami of Ohio and 31 points against Louisville) and 38 points to Oregon State (scored only 21 against San Diego State and 38 points to Idaho State).
Purdue near the bottom of all NCAAF in points per game (36.8)-worse than Temple and dead last by a mile in the B1G--worse than UCLA!!!
Did Wisconsin improve, or feast on weak offense?
My supposition is that you are an inflammatory buttface.Please elaborate on our advantage via two-way familiarity, Mr. Sagan. Or, do you request a Mulligan on this brilliant supposition?
I've been contemplating this for a little while now and figured I'd just ask. Do you mean that he's both an inflammatory person and a buttface? Or do you mean that his face resembles an inflamed butt?My supposition is that you are an inflammatory buttface.
Shelby interpreted this as one thing. Adjective and noun. This insult and question will not keep Shelby awake tonight however.I've been contemplating this for a little while now and figured I'd just ask. Do you mean that he's both an inflammatory person and a buttface? Or do you mean that his face resembles an inflamed butt?
I struggle with ambiguity and this one would've kept me awake tonight. 🙂
Insults never keep me awake. Ambiguity sometimes does.Shelby interpreted this as one thing. Adjective and noun. This insult and question will not keep Shelby awake tonight however.
Shelby interpreted this as one thing. Adjective and noun. This insult and question will not keep Shelby awake tonight however.
Insults never keep me awake. Ambiguity sometimes does.
Shelby suggests Ambien or watching replays of the RU offense. The latter will put you to sleep in half the time.Insults never keep me awake. Ambiguity sometimes does.
Shelby suggests Ambien or watching replays of the RU offense. The latter will put you to sleep in half the time.
again, get over the Nebraska game. The offense hasn’t been good against any P4/5 opponent under 2.0 except for last year’s VT game at home. Nebraska was just another example.
My # is 17. They’ll need to score a minimum of 17 just to have a chance to win any remaining game, including against UCLA. That’s the minimum. More than that and they have a chance. I don’t think the offense will surpass that # in several games, and the team will still lose a few games that they do. Good offense wins.
To Shelby, the trajectory still leads to 6-6 or 7-5.
I said the offense hasn’t been good, not that we never score 17. 17 is the baseline for having any chance….Dude - we scored more than 17 against Washington and VTech. I’m not sure what your point is on this. You only have one game worth of data for this year’s team to base your conclusion that we “can’t” score 17 - Nebraska.
This was a neat play design.Nebraska ran a great play that was like a work of art.
Two fake hand-offs and a pass after Rutgers drawn in - zoop-zoop boom.
Picasso said great artists take from others so RU should copy this.
Its in AK's range and could display Mongo's ability
c'mon...you can't be serious. that suggestion is BS. (Because Schiano)Nebraska ran a great play that was like a work of art.
Two fake hand-offs and a pass after Rutgers drawn in - zoop-zoop boom.
Picasso said great artists take from others so RU should copy this.
Its in AK's range and could display Mongo's ability
c'mon...you can't be serious. that suggestion is BS. (Because Schiano)
And look at their linemen 51 and 59 blocking downfield. Our OL can't run that far or that fast.
FYI..Shelby likes "zoop-zoop-boom" and will definitely use that in conversation this week. Probably at Chipotle or Ace Hardware. Have a few days to determine context.
I thought the offense was pretty good against VT 2024 at least for 3 quarters. Miami bowl game was very solid unless pass/run balance is required for your measure of 'good'.I said the offense hasn’t been good, not that we never score 17. 17 is the baseline for having any chance….
yes we doI don't even know if Nebraska could run that play so well a second time.
Sometimes all the atoms like-up right and the juice of the universe flows unimpeded.
When such plays fail its "pop pop flop."
We know what that looks like lol