ADVERTISEMENT

Podcast Final Thoughts on Rutgers / Nebraska + Greg Schiano Wisconsin Presser

Good breakdown.
Alec from Game of Thrones was a plus
The Wisconsin staff ties to RU was interesting
About to listen, other than Blazek, who else has ties?

240716FB-1044-Blazek.png
 
That's pretty common that FBS staff usually know of each other I thought. I wonder how much of an advantage we get from this.
 
That's pretty common that FBS staff usually know of each other I thought. I wonder how much of an advantage we get from this.
Please elaborate on our advantage via two-way familiarity, Mr. Sagan. Or, do you request a Mulligan on this brilliant supposition?
 
The problem I see is that Wisconsin looks to have improved a lot. The light bulb went on for them. Scoring 52 on a Purdue (i know they're not that great) is a big Oh oh for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: winfield102
The problem I see is that Wisconsin looks to have improved a lot. The light bulb went on for them. Scoring 52 on a Purdue (i know they're not that great) is a big Oh oh for us.
Purdue gave up 66 points to Notre Dame (Notre Dame scored 14 points against NIU in a loss and 18 points against Miami of Ohio and 31 points against Louisville) and 38 points to Oregon State (scored only 21 against San Diego State and 38 points to Idaho State).

Purdue near the bottom of all NCAAF in points per game (36.8)-worse than Temple and dead last by a mile in the B1G--worse than UCLA!!!

Did Wisconsin improve, or feast on weak offense?
 
Purdue gave up 66 points to Notre Dame (Notre Dame scored 14 points against NIU in a loss and 18 points against Miami of Ohio and 31 points against Louisville) and 38 points to Oregon State (scored only 21 against San Diego State and 38 points to Idaho State).

Purdue near the bottom of all NCAAF in points per game (36.8)-worse than Temple and dead last by a mile in the B1G--worse than UCLA!!!

Did Wisconsin improve, or feast on weak offense?
Besides being the doormat of the B1G, Purdue would lose to most of the MAC teams this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
My supposition is that you are an inflammatory buttface.
I've been contemplating this for a little while now and figured I'd just ask. Do you mean that he's both an inflammatory person and a buttface? Or do you mean that his face resembles an inflamed butt?

I struggle with ambiguity and this one would've kept me awake tonight. 🙂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RUSK97
I've been contemplating this for a little while now and figured I'd just ask. Do you mean that he's both an inflammatory person and a buttface? Or do you mean that his face resembles an inflamed butt?

I struggle with ambiguity and this one would've kept me awake tonight. 🙂
Shelby interpreted this as one thing. Adjective and noun. This insult and question will not keep Shelby awake tonight however.
 
Shelby suggests Ambien or watching replays of the RU offense. The latter will put you to sleep in half the time.

Suit yourself but at least concede that any team’s offense would’ve met this criteria with Saturday’s weather conditions. Nebraska’s offensive output is there for you clear as day. And our QB was in a damn leg brace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3
again, get over the Nebraska game. The offense hasn’t been good against any P4/5 opponent under 2.0 except for last year’s VT game at home. Nebraska was just another example.

My # is 17. They’ll need to score a minimum of 17 just to have a chance to win any remaining game, including against UCLA. That’s the minimum. More than that and they have a chance. I don’t think the offense will surpass that # in several games, and the team will still lose a few games that they do. Good offense wins.

To Shelby, the trajectory still leads to 6-6 or 7-5.
 
again, get over the Nebraska game. The offense hasn’t been good against any P4/5 opponent under 2.0 except for last year’s VT game at home. Nebraska was just another example.

My # is 17. They’ll need to score a minimum of 17 just to have a chance to win any remaining game, including against UCLA. That’s the minimum. More than that and they have a chance. I don’t think the offense will surpass that # in several games, and the team will still lose a few games that they do. Good offense wins.

To Shelby, the trajectory still leads to 6-6 or 7-5.

Dude - we scored more than 17 against Washington and VTech. I’m not sure what your point is on this. You only have one game worth of data for this year’s team to base your conclusion that we “can’t” score 17 - Nebraska.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3
Dude - we scored more than 17 against Washington and VTech. I’m not sure what your point is on this. You only have one game worth of data for this year’s team to base your conclusion that we “can’t” score 17 - Nebraska.
I said the offense hasn’t been good, not that we never score 17. 17 is the baseline for having any chance….
 
Nebraska ran a great play that was like a work of art.
Two fake hand-offs and a pass after Rutgers drawn in - zoop-zoop boom.
Picasso said great artists take from others so RU should copy this.
Its in AK's range and could display Mongo's ability


bTT7JGp.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Nebraska ran a great play that was like a work of art.
Two fake hand-offs and a pass after Rutgers drawn in - zoop-zoop boom.
Picasso said great artists take from others so RU should copy this.
Its in AK's range and could display Mongo's ability


bTT7JGp.gif
This was a neat play design.
 
Nebraska ran a great play that was like a work of art.
Two fake hand-offs and a pass after Rutgers drawn in - zoop-zoop boom.
Picasso said great artists take from others so RU should copy this.
Its in AK's range and could display Mongo's ability


bTT7JGp.gif
c'mon...you can't be serious. that suggestion is BS. (Because Schiano)

And look at their linemen 51 and 59 blocking downfield. Our OL can't run that far or that fast.

FYI..Shelby likes "zoop-zoop-boom" and will definitely use that in conversation this week. Probably at Chipotle or Ace Hardware. Have a few days to determine context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan
c'mon...you can't be serious. that suggestion is BS. (Because Schiano)

And look at their linemen 51 and 59 blocking downfield. Our OL can't run that far or that fast.

FYI..Shelby likes "zoop-zoop-boom" and will definitely use that in conversation this week. Probably at Chipotle or Ace Hardware. Have a few days to determine context.

I don't even know if Nebraska could run that play so well a second time.
Sometimes all the atoms like-up right and the juice of the universe flows unimpeded.
When such plays fail its "pop pop flop."
We know what that looks like lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
I said the offense hasn’t been good, not that we never score 17. 17 is the baseline for having any chance….
I thought the offense was pretty good against VT 2024 at least for 3 quarters. Miami bowl game was very solid unless pass/run balance is required for your measure of 'good'.
 
I don't even know if Nebraska could run that play so well a second time.
Sometimes all the atoms like-up right and the juice of the universe flows unimpeded.
When such plays fail its "pop pop flop."
We know what that looks like lol
yes we do
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT