ChatGPT o3
Thought for 46 seconds
Short answer
Among the jobs that are (or soon will be) on the market, the Rutgers University Athletic Director post sits in the upper‑middle tier of desirability for most qualified candidates: it is clearly a Power‑Conference (Big Ten) chair with a ~$1 million compensation level and access to the league’s soaring media distributions, but it also carries heavier‑than‑normal fiscal, political and reputational baggage that keeps it a step below the blue‑chip AD jobs at places such as Ohio State, Michigan, Texas or Georgia.
At the same time, the $70 M deficit, donor‑development mountain and lingering reputational clean‑up mean only those with (1) demonstrated fundraising acumen, (2) political dexterity and (3) comfort working in a pro‑sports media environment will view it as a top‑five target. Everyone else will likely rank it “good, but not dream‑job” and watch to see how much Rutgers is really willing to invest in the next regime.
Sources
You said:
How does the Rutgers University Athletic Director job rank in terms of desirability amongst qualified candidates?ChatGPT said:
Thought for 46 seconds
Short answer
Among the jobs that are (or soon will be) on the market, the Rutgers University Athletic Director post sits in the upper‑middle tier of desirability for most qualified candidates: it is clearly a Power‑Conference (Big Ten) chair with a ~$1 million compensation level and access to the league’s soaring media distributions, but it also carries heavier‑than‑normal fiscal, political and reputational baggage that keeps it a step below the blue‑chip AD jobs at places such as Ohio State, Michigan, Texas or Georgia.
How insiders size it up
| Dimension | What helps | What hurts |
|---|---|---|
| Conference & visibility | ‑ Full Big Ten member in the nation’s largest media market. ‑ Big Ten distributions already $60 M+ and projected $80‑100 M per school when the new TV deal ramps up ESPN.com | — League peers have far deeper local donor cultures; RU ranks bottom‑three in booster revenue 247Sports |
| Compensation | Pat Hobbs’ 2022 extension paid $1.03 M base plus incentives (mid‑pack for Big Ten ADs) Forbes | — Still well below the $1.5‑2.2 M that the top Big Ten ADs now command; room for upward negotiation but not guaranteed. |
| Program trajectory | ‑ Men’s basketball recruiting momentum (Dylan Harper, Ace Bailey) and a bowl‑winning football season under Greg Schiano New York Post | — Football remains bottom‑quartile in the league; sustained competitiveness will require facility and NIL spending many times current levels. |
| Resources & finances | ‑ Incoming media cash + NIL collectives give an opportunity for a reset. | — Operating deficit exceeded $70 M in FY 2024 (largest in the Big Ten) and donor pipeline is thin Sports Business JournalForbes. — Athletics still relies on $28 M+ in direct university support; new AD will be under pressure from faculty and legislators. |
| Institutional politics | ‑ New university president and board say they want a “transformational” AD and have retained Turnkey ZRG to run a national search Hunt Scanlon Media | — Job opens amid the fallout of Pat Hobbs’ resignation and subsequent investigation into an improper relationship with a coach, so the next AD must rebuild trust and compliance culture New York Post |
| Lifestyle / market | ‑ Highly populated alumni base in the NYC/NJ corridor, easy airline access, strong Olympic‑sport talent footprint. | — Cost of living, brutal media scrutiny, and limited on‑campus space make capital projects more expensive than in the Midwest/South. |
How candidates (and search firms) really stack‑rank it
- Tier 1 (dream jobs / established ADs only) – Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia, Michigan, Texas, Notre Dame: budgets $225‑260 M, AD pay $1.8‑3.0 M.
- Tier 1A (very attractive Power‑5) – Wisconsin, Penn State, LSU, Oklahoma, Clemson: similar resources, somewhat smaller footprints.
- Tier 2 (solid Power‑5 with some headwinds) – Rutgers, Maryland, Arizona State, Kansas, Washington State. These roles pay $900 k‑$1.3 M and are magnets for (a) sitting Group‑of‑5 ADs looking to “play in the big leagues,” or (b) No. 2 deputies at Tier 1 programs.
- Tier 3 (Group‑of‑5, FCS flagship or high‑end Olympic‑sport schools) – Pay $350‑800 k, fewer national candidates, less pressure.
The likely talent pool
Most interested:- Rising ADs at AAC/Mountain West schools (e.g., San Diego State, Memphis).
- Big Ten or SEC “senior associate AD for external affairs” types who already manage nine‑figure budgets.
- Power‑conference deputy ADs with Northeast roots—names already floated include Texas executive Sr. Assoc. AD Sarah Baumgartner (a former RU track star) 247Sports.
- Sitting Power‑5 ADs in the Midwest/South with stable situations (e.g., Kansas State, Arkansas).
- Candidates with strong compliance reputations may hesitate because of the recent scandal spotlight.
Bottom line
For candidates who prioritize conference stature, media exposure and upside potential over immediate budgetary comfort, Rutgers is a compelling—but challenging—next step. It offers the platform of a Big Ten brand in a top‑one media market, a salary in the seven figures and the opportunity to be the person who finally rights the Scarlet Knights’ fiscal ship.At the same time, the $70 M deficit, donor‑development mountain and lingering reputational clean‑up mean only those with (1) demonstrated fundraising acumen, (2) political dexterity and (3) comfort working in a pro‑sports media environment will view it as a top‑five target. Everyone else will likely rank it “good, but not dream‑job” and watch to see how much Rutgers is really willing to invest in the next regime.
Sources
