I'm sure you have all seen the story that Rutgers is doing a top to bottom investigation of the football program, with a focus on drug testing and hostesses. Any sense on whether this is regular due diligence or is this a precursor to getting rid of Flood?
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/i...res_law_firm_for_top_to_bottom_investiga.html
When everything happened in the first week or two of the season (arrests and email-gate) some seemed pretty confident that Flood would never coach another game here, while others thought he would get the rest of the season, while others still thought on-the-field performance would determine his fate. I'm pretty ambivalent at this point and am over the arrests and email issues and would like to see on-the-field performance drive any decision, but if I were looking for reasons to get rid of someone for cause, and to do it sooner rather than later, I suppose this lines up with what I would do.
Anyone have any thoughts on this specific investigation and what it means?
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/i...res_law_firm_for_top_to_bottom_investiga.html
When everything happened in the first week or two of the season (arrests and email-gate) some seemed pretty confident that Flood would never coach another game here, while others thought he would get the rest of the season, while others still thought on-the-field performance would determine his fate. I'm pretty ambivalent at this point and am over the arrests and email issues and would like to see on-the-field performance drive any decision, but if I were looking for reasons to get rid of someone for cause, and to do it sooner rather than later, I suppose this lines up with what I would do.
Anyone have any thoughts on this specific investigation and what it means?
