Was watching the college pre game show and they were going over possible coaches for USC and USCe. They mentioned coaches that was brought up on this board, Fuente, Herman, Doc Holliday, Campbell and RHULE.Looking good against Ole Miss.
Someone is going to get a good coach in Fuente this offseason.
They pumped a lot of Fed Ex money into building new facilities. Got lucky with a good unknown coach. They want out of the AAC and doing everything in their power to make it happen.I was just going to start a thread about Memphis, but of course I won't now. How did they get so good so fast? It was a very short time ago that they were on an amazing losing streak and were probably one of the bottom five FCS teams in the country.
Good coaching, That's why I'm always big on that over recruiting. If you can do both well then great but if I have to choose one get me the coach over the recruiter. Leave recruiting to the staff, lower level staff specifically (position coaches etc..).I was just going to start a thread about Memphis, but of course I won't now. How did they get so good so fast? It was a very short time ago that they were on an amazing losing streak and were probably one of the bottom five FCS teams in the country.
I was just going to start a thread about Memphis, but of course I won't now. How did they get so good so fast? It was a very short time ago that they were on an amazing losing streak and were probably one of the bottom five FCS teams in the country.
I'd like to see more, as in repeat last year's performance to see consistency but I don't think it's smoke and mirrors. Did you read above how much they lost on defense from players to their coordinator who's doing a solid job at Mizzou now. To continue winning at the level is pretty good considering the losses on that side of the ball. If it lasts we'll see but so far so good.They pulled the trigger on firing a bad coach quickly. They saw 3-21 in 2 years with Larry Porter and got him out of there. Plus they are in an area with a lot of HS talent nearby. It still took Fuente 3 years to have a good year, and that may be buoyed by their schedule. Sports-reference.com had their schedule at 97th out of 128th last year and has them at 113th so far this year. Their last 3 games have all been decided by 7 points or less.
The deeper I dig, there may be some smoke and mirrors to the whole thing, but I'm still impressed by their performance today.
I'd like to see more, as in repeat last year's performance to see consistency but I don't think it's smoke and mirrors. Did you read above how much they lost on defense from players to their coordinator who's doing a solid job at Mizzou now. To continue winning at the level is pretty good considering the losses on that side of the ball. If it lasts we'll see but so far so good.
This Ole Miss game was house money to me. I always say conference performance is important. Those are your peers and who you have to beat and so far they've done it even after losing that much on defense. People are gaga for Rhule who hasn't even done it for 1 year yet and he's on the easier half of the conference this year. His toughest game will be Memphis. Memphis is on the same side with Houston and Navy. If you look at Rhule's rankings as coordinator they weren't impressive at all and at least a couple weeks ago when I checked neither were Temple's on offense/defense.
You never know for sure how a coach will do when he steps up but he's done a nice job at Memphis bringing them up from the bottom of the barrel.
Another TD 31-14 Memphis.
Maybe there aren't enough good defensive backs with speed to cover all the receivers in college. There enough of them in the NFL.Why don't more NFL teams run the spread if it works so well in college? Yes, guys are bigger, faster, and stronger, but it's so on both sides of the ball.
Because no one wants to spend a number two overall pick on a QB (RG3) only to see his season come to an end because of getting clocked too many times. The spread does not work in the NFL.Why don't more NFL teams run the spread if it works so well in college? Yes, guys are bigger, faster, and stronger, but it's so on both sides of the ball.
Because no one wants to spend a number two overall pick on a QB (RG3) only to see his season come to an end because of getting clocked too many times. The spread does not work in the NFL.
If these guys get hired this year, not really sure who's up for next year on my pretend AD list lol.
His record at Toledo looks good but they don't play any good teams outside their conference. Tim Beckman was at Toledo and looks good before being hired by Illinois and failing there. Memphis plays some good teams as well as Houston.
A coach with a signature win, look at that.
It's no longer 32 anymore, it's 43 right now and as mentioned a couple of months ago pacing at 49-52 rating at end of season, we are 11th in the Big Ten, very similar to last 2 years. Not being negativeYup. Would love him to come here but it would never happen. We have to hold on to that vaunted #32 recruiting class after all:)
His record at Toledo looks good but they don't play any good teams outside their conference. Tim Beckman was at Toledo and looks good before being hired by Illinois and failing there. Memphis plays some good teams as well as Houston.
He's okay for me. He's done a nice job with wins there but nothing generally really good on either side of the ball. I think last year they were in the teens in scoring/total offense but otherwise usually in the 40s or so. On defense usually worse although this year ranked 6 in scoring defense and 40s total. On its face looking at his record he looks good and he could get hired this year but I want something to point to that can wow me (top 10 offense or defense) but I don't know. I'm not going to say I don't like him but just ambivalent to this point.