Two more clear examples today on how this rag only has an interest in the controversy and not actually the team.
1. 3 hours after the game On NJ.com the top story is how there is now a video. It is not about the huge win.
2. I watched the whole press conference and the first question they ask is about the off field stuff ! Then flood says "let's talk the game first" . They didn't have many questions there and when it is time for off field questions they go all out like thirsty wolves. Like its the only thing they were interested in.
It is very clear that from the top NJ.com writers are being told to dig and create controversy as their top priority. I know this isn't news but it simply cannot be debated that some high up there wants to make RU look bad at any chance there is.
The question I'm still not sure is that :
Do they do this because it creates clicks ? Or maybe this is the stuff that will get picked up by ESPN and others ?
Or is it that someone high up really really hates RU and has a personal vendetta against RU?
I think it's actually a high combination of both. How does RU get them to play fair ? By fair I mean report stories which on,y have been properly investigated and fully factual. Opinion garbage pieces like "fire so and so" aren't published at the quality of a college blogger post.
1. 3 hours after the game On NJ.com the top story is how there is now a video. It is not about the huge win.
2. I watched the whole press conference and the first question they ask is about the off field stuff ! Then flood says "let's talk the game first" . They didn't have many questions there and when it is time for off field questions they go all out like thirsty wolves. Like its the only thing they were interested in.
It is very clear that from the top NJ.com writers are being told to dig and create controversy as their top priority. I know this isn't news but it simply cannot be debated that some high up there wants to make RU look bad at any chance there is.
The question I'm still not sure is that :
Do they do this because it creates clicks ? Or maybe this is the stuff that will get picked up by ESPN and others ?
Or is it that someone high up really really hates RU and has a personal vendetta against RU?
I think it's actually a high combination of both. How does RU get them to play fair ? By fair I mean report stories which on,y have been properly investigated and fully factual. Opinion garbage pieces like "fire so and so" aren't published at the quality of a college blogger post.
