There are many posters whose opinion I respect as much, if not more, than a beat writer.
Carino is one of the best and is around the program a ton.
He didn't think our season last year would be near as good as it was. I think he even thought there was a chance we would win 5 games.Carino is one of the best and is around the program a ton.
He didn't think our season last year would be near as good as it was. I think he even thought there was a chance we would win 5 games.
Not disputing that. You will mostly get a positive spin from him and most beat reporters. If not they risk losing access.
best thing I heard from those in the know (parents)--this team really gets along together very well --hope it continues
Good stuff Dave. Thanks. I found everything Carino talked about, is what most of us concluded here too: i.e., we need a skilled big, be it from the grad transfer route or juco ranks. We have great depth at guard, and based on what I learned in this article, I hope Pikiell DOES employ that three-quarter press they worked on last year, because we really didn't see it, if at all.
There are a lot of question marks around the 4 freshman. The progress of those 4 PLUS Mulcahy probably ends up defining what the next 2 years will look like and possibly the fate of the coaching staff.
One other comment: I like what he said about Baker. He believes like I do that once the pressure is taken off Baker having to play out of position as pg, Baker will thrive in the 2 guard or combo guard position. I think next year we will see a much better shooter in Gio from the outside. We know he can drive, but I think having to play pg most of the season, he hit that wall again at the end of the year.
I am very patient. Not sure about everyone else. The success in the next 2 years on the court will have a lot to do with the development of the freshman. Outside of the uber-positive fans the jury has to be out on every single player on this roster.
If 1 of the 4 freshman take their games to a higher level I don’t see a path to significant improvement
Eugene is gone in 2 years . HUGE loss. HUGE loss
I am not sure if Eugene is a loss after this season or not. I believe in the theory that more touches spread out amongst teammates makes the entire unit better.
Eugene has a unique skill set because he is the most adept low post player. He's the best defender and toughest player. But there's always been a thought that players are a huge loss and in cases during a rebuild, those items are magnified. I'm not quite so sure the next 2 seasons are reliant on how well Eugene plays next year and how they can replace him the following year.
Recruiting in the next 3 to 12 months will determine much more for the next 3 years of the program's ultimate goal of being a consistent winner (over .500 overall and entering that space of being in the NIT bubble discussion).
I agree. Whatever you think of Carino he certainly has (more than most) insight in to Pikiell's thinking. Geo played on the ball last year by necessity and I think he did an admirable job. But it seems pretty obvious with the additions of Young and Mulcahy (going after and missing on Alvarado) that Coach would ideally like Geo playing some real minutes as the off guard. Like Geo did his frosh season. We are better if that happens.
I agree entirely with you about EO. I also think that with all the talk about our guards, the guy whose improvement gets us into the top half of the league is Myles Johnson.I am not sure if Eugene is a loss after this season or not. I believe in the theory that more touches spread out amongst teammates makes the entire unit better.
Eugene has a unique skill set because he is the most adept low post player. He's the best defender and toughest player. But there's always been a thought that players are a huge loss and in cases during a rebuild, those items are magnified. I'm not quite so sure the next 2 seasons are reliant on how well Eugene plays next year and how they can replace him the following year.
Recruiting in the next 3 to 12 months will determine much more for the next 3 years of the program's ultimate goal of being a consistent winner (over .500 overall and entering that space of being in the NIT bubble discussion).
There are a lot of question marks around the 4 freshman. The progress of those 4 PLUS Mulcahy probably ends up defining what the next 2 years will look like and possibly the fate of the coaching staff.
The EO replacement is the most important recruit we need to hit on We are pretty set with guards and wingsI think it’s who’s not year yet, via the 2020 class, that will define the coaching staff. The current talent gives stability. But if we want to climb the standings we need more talented youth to push and blend with the core in place now.
He's gone after next year. He'll be a senior.I am very patient. Not sure about everyone else. The success in the next 2 years on the court will have a lot to do with the development of the freshman. Outside of the uber-positive fans the jury has to be out on every single player on this roster.
If 1 of the 4 freshman take their games to a higher level I don’t see a path to significant improvement
Eugene is gone in 2 years . HUGE loss. HUGE loss
He's gone after next year. He'll be a senior.
There's nothing to suggest Young has an uncertain role or a question of his talent level, based on the practices he's contributed to in the past year. And he has a 25 point game vs Texas Tech, just as much as Caleb McConnell had a 25 point game at Illinois.
One 25 point game is kinda written off by fans here because he happened at Texas, one is viewed as the sign of the future with McConnell, which is still a small sample size of minutes to consider.....