I'm not going to knock Flood if he gets another assistant position or a lower level HC job
Nor feel good about Brock being out as the Blue Hens HC and imply he'd be a bad assistant if hired by another school.
All I can say is I knocked Kirk Ciarrocca's ability as an OC because of his time at RU, but it looks like he's doing a good job at WMU under Fleck
Ed Pinkham is another one that I thought wasn't a good one when he was RU's DC, even if Rutgers was 15th in the country in rushing defense, 16th in scoring defense and 18th in total defense with him as its DC because I gave Schiano the credit for that
Now as WMU's DC he's not doing to shabby .
Brock might be better suited as an assistant and Flood the same.
I wasn't impressed all that much with Flood as an OL coach from 2007 on , but the 2006 OL had me thinking he was a good one then lost that feeling because of the way RU did't look the same after 2006.
Kirk and Ed might be better suited at a mid major and Fleck understood that when he hired them.
Just because coaches don't succeed at one place doesn't mean they won't find success someplace else even if it's a lesser position or a program lower on the totem pole they the one they were made to leave. So I'll just let others rip away and wonder if it's justified o will prove to be wrong.