Actually, besides all of the shit about RU and NJ, the predicted scores are probably nowhere near the actual final score. Goes to show what they know.
Actually, based on our lack of offense against teams who play D, and them having both the #2 Run and Total D's in the nation, on a windy day which will hurt our passing game, I think they're probably right on the mark with their predictions. Going to be VERY difficult for us to score more than 10/13 points tomorrow.
Possibly more if Rettig started.
All hail Flood!Douchey writeup and douchey post. We beat them last year. Nobody intimidated anybody. Our pany waste faculty alleged that someone making more money than them could be intimidating. Must be sad to cower in fear your whole life over people who make more money than you.
This is when I wish we had competent writers.
If it is windy, doesn't that help our defense and pass coverage more than hurt us?
We are mostly a run team anyway.
I would think we can do a decent job against the run.
Wow, I like those guys, but that was uncalled for. I guess in their defense none of them has ever been onboard with the decision to expand the Big Ten.
The blind hatred of the Flood haters is amusing. Surprised at you, Zap, as I think you are one of the more rational people here. The article was so off base, it was amusing.All hail Flood!
Exactly. I have one thing to say back to that article.What a bunch of Jackasses in Michigan. Delaney is laughing all the way to the bank.
What does last year have to do with it???The blind hatred of the Flood haters is amusing. Surprised at you, Zap, as I think you are one of the more rational people here. The article was so off base, it was amusing.
1. We beat them last year.
2. Flood did not intimidate the teacher--let's be real here--Flood is not an intimidating guy--in fact we have pages of posts describing what an incompetent Fudd or Dudd he is. The wussy teacher union made up some sort of false narrative that talking to Flood could be intimidating because he made so much money. That's is a laughable position coming from educators.
This board has lost it's reading comprehension and can't separate standing up for Rutgers and hating Flood. We know many here are praying for a blowout loss tomorrow to get what they want. The sad thing is they may not get what they want. Peace.
The blind hatred of the Flood haters is amusing. Surprised at you, Zap, as I think you are one of the more rational people here. The article was so off base, it was amusing.
1. We beat them last year.
2. Flood did not intimidate the teacher--let's be real here--Flood is not an intimidating guy--in fact we have pages of posts describing what an incompetent Fudd or Dudd he is. The wussy teacher union made up some sort of false narrative that talking to Flood could be intimidating because he made so much money. That's is a laughable position coming from educators.
This board has lost it's reading comprehension and can't separate standing up for Rutgers and hating Flood. We know many here are praying for a blowout loss tomorrow to get what they want. The sad thing is they may not get what they want. Peace.
Back then the stadium only held 83,370We played at Penn State in 1988 in front of almost 100K and won. It happens.
We might as well bring the team home and forfeit the game.
Chicken Little was right!
What does that article have to do with the article written by the douchebag twits in the article linked in the OP? I comprehend it just fine. We don't have Urban Meyer or Jim Harbaugh coaching here. And they will never coach here. Neither will penis head. So what's your point?When YOU read this article can you comprehend what the bottom line is?
http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2015/11/ohio_state_vs_michigan_vs_penn.html
They're conceited but that's ok. We all know ohio state has pushed them around for 20 years and they're not even the best team in Michigan anymore.
OK,I'll play. Who would YOU like to see him wake up as?And why?:sunglasses:would love to see Flood wake up as a different person. Knowing that Michigan's game plan revolves around what they've seen of the RU offense and Laviano, he decides to go for broke and start Rettig on a hunch...
Back then the stadium only held 83,370
F*ck Michigan.
Actually, in 1988, Rutgers Stadium sat closer to 25k, but who's counting. ;)Thanks! Considering Rutgers Stadium only sat 35K it seemed like 90K to this then-RU junior!
What does last year have to do with it???
I believe Flood advocated for a guy (Barnwell) he knew was involved in a fight, under investigation and a likely candidate for suspension.The blind hatred of the Flood haters is amusing. Surprised at you, Zap, as I think you are one of the more rational people here. The article was so off base, it was amusing.
1. We beat them last year.
2. Flood did not intimidate the teacher--let's be real here--Flood is not an intimidating guy--in fact we have pages of posts describing what an incompetent Fudd or Dudd he is. The wussy teacher union made up some sort of false narrative that talking to Flood could be intimidating because he made so much money. That's is a laughable position coming from educators.
This board has lost it's reading comprehension and can't separate standing up for Rutgers and hating Flood. We know many here are praying for a blowout loss tomorrow to get what they want. The sad thing is they may not get what they want. Peace.