Quadrant 1 and Quadrant 2 Wins
- Thread starter MadRU
- Start date
Forget St. John’s
If we were 9/17-8 right now and people would be freaking out around here nwith three to go and people would be on pins and needles around here about making the tournament
you are assuming the Big 10 will have all its teams in the top 100 net next year...that is not always true, it certainly wasnt true the previous season
by the way the only Q1 win was Penn State who is 11-16
also RU's non conference schedule is ranked 293...its up to you whether you think that is okay
by the way the only Q1 win was Penn State who is 11-16
also RU's non conference schedule is ranked 293...its up to you whether you think that is okay
they went to Quadrants last year instead of just top 25, top 50, top 100,..it accounts for a different range
Quadrant 1
H:1-30 N:1-50 A:1-75
Quadrant 2
H:31-75 N:51-100 A:76-135
Quadrant 3
H:76-160 N:101-200 A:136-240
Quadrant 4
H:161-353 N:201-353 A:241-353
H:1-30 N:1-50 A:1-75
Quadrant 2
H:31-75 N:51-100 A:76-135
Quadrant 3
H:76-160 N:101-200 A:136-240
Quadrant 4
H:161-353 N:201-353 A:241-353
I knew you had it in you to find the dark cloud in the silver lining. [roll][roll]
Btw, Northwestern didn't qualify as a quad 1 win?
Northwestern is 85 that is Q2
but realistically you cannot think that the 13th and 14th place teams in the league will be Q1 or even Q2 games going forward..its not likely Every conference has bottom feeders. This season is rare that the bottom of the Big 10 is pretty good.
but realistically you cannot think that the 13th and 14th place teams in the league will be Q1 or even Q2 games going forward..its not likely Every conference has bottom feeders. This season is rare that the bottom of the Big 10 is pretty good.
check my post above...they give a different ranged based on home, away or neutral. Road games count more
I for one am not sure I like this system though because it weighs the Penn State game because it was on the road better than the Ohio State and Minnesota wins...sort of silly because those latter teams are NCAA teams...
I thought with all of the B1G teams ranked much higher than Rutgers in all the analytics, it would be a quad 1 victory. None of this crap makes senses to me anyway.
I get it ....I realize that isn’t going to make it in most years ...but this year it does
I think we have to do something to the schedule ...but mostly from the bottom up ..
But all of those ranked teams you say we have more Q1 and Q2 wins than probably have a lot fewer losses than we have.
You can play with statistics in a variety of ways. But the bottom line is either beef up the nonconference schedule if we think we can be a bubble team or at least get rid of some of the really bad teams at the bottom.
Under the old system you could "rig" your schedule by playing enough decent teams but no awful ones to give yourself an undeserved good RPI. I'm sure you can do the same thing now.
You can play with statistics in a variety of ways. But the bottom line is either beef up the nonconference schedule if we think we can be a bubble team or at least get rid of some of the really bad teams at the bottom.
Under the old system you could "rig" your schedule by playing enough decent teams but no awful ones to give yourself an undeserved good RPI. I'm sure you can do the same thing now.
Similar threads
