Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good luck to Ron, hope he gets drafted and has a productive NBA career. Best recruit of the Pike era.
It really did not. He did all he could at this level.Good for him. Made no sense to come back.
So, I was appreciating your positive post Halldan1, and then you had to stick "chose" in there. A passive-aggresive troll is still a troll.Laughed my butt off after a bunch of SHU guys and myself saw Harper play in a tournament all day (3 games) and eventually saw him rated as a 3 star player before he played a game at Rutgers.
Anyone who thought they were seeing a 3 star player that day clearly had no idea how good this kid was.
Would have loved him at SHU but we chose Rhoden instead. Both school benefited.
So you're saying you think that Rutgers made the right choice when they chose RJH over Rhoden.Did I say Rhoden was better than Harper? In my opinion they are neck and neck with Harper clearly deserving the Haggerty award this year. Something I posted on the SHU board as well.
Pretty touchy when someone comes to compliment your player and you see it as a passive-aggressive troll.
That's why I seldom post here. Because of people like you.
Actually Dan, if you had said Rhoden was better than Harper I may not have agreed with you but I absolutely would have respected your opinion. Instead, you implied that SHU "chose" Rhoden over Harper. That's the passive agressive dig that I didn't appreciate.Did I say Rhoden was better than Harper? In my opinion they are neck and neck with Harper clearly deserving the Haggerty award this year. Something I posted on the SHU board as well.
Pretty touchy when someone comes to compliment your player and you see it as a passive-aggressive troll.
That's why I seldom post here. Because of people like you.
First of all Dan, I appreciate you coming back and engaging on this. You seem to sincerely believe that I'm being an a**hole, so I'll take another shot at trying to explain myself. To me, there are different types of trolls. There are obvious, obnoxious trolls, which you probably have to deal with all the time as an administrator, and then there are subtle, more passive trolls. It's great that you complimented Ron and that you pointed out that things worked out well for both teams. I agree. I also didn't read into your post that you were saying Rhoden was the better player. But, for some reason, you felt compelled to point out that the Hall "chose" Rhoden over Harper. If you had just left that out, I would have had no problem with your post and would have gladly hit the like button. Instead, when called out on it, you actually doubled down by stating even more clearly "SHU did choose Rhoden over Harper," once again trolling RU and proving my point. Does that mean you're an ogre? Of course not. I hope we can have reasonable discussions about RU and SHU basketball in the future. I respect the Hall and its fans and I think it's a great rivalry.SHU did choose Rhoden over Harper. Doesn't mean they got the better player. My point was it worked out well for both teams which turned out to be the perfect scenario.
Nowhere was there a hint of my trolling. I am the moderator of the SHU board and have to put up with trolling most everyday. Why would you think I would do that here?
That's fair caneI think you're unnecessarily stretching Dan's comments. Harper and Rhoden are similar players in that they are 3's that can stretch to a college 4. I took his comment to mean that SHU would take 1, but not both players, and Rhoden just happened to be the one that committed.
I took Hall Dan saying:I think you're unnecessarily stretching Dan's comments. Harper and Rhoden are similar players in that they are 3's that can stretch to a college 4. I took his comment to mean that SHU would take 1, but not both players, and Rhoden just happened to be the one that committed.
Good news is.. nobody really shot well from 3 in those games (the two where the stat sheets were posted)1 of 6 from 3. Ouch.