The first sign that Rutgers is really making progress is to win league games at home.Road wins will be very difficult with the current talent level.Gotta beat these teams when they're down, and Wisky is definitely down.
Who is the best equipped on our team to guard Happ?
I'd actually think Eugene.
Gotta beat these teams when they're down, and Wisky is definitely down.
Have to,be up before you're downthey're down? and we're not?? what an understatement
Hey guys, Badger fan here. UW has been besieged by the injury bug, losing starting point guard Trice (expected back sometime this season) and key reserve guard/forward King (for the season). Pritzl had been playing more than 30 minutes a game before going down in practice before the game on Tuesday - that's 3 guards missing (though Pritzl might be back tonight). Also, the bigs that everyone expected to contribute this year after graduating 4 starters have not stepped up at all, therefore they had to burn Reuvers' redshirt. Reuvers is active big, but he is not strong enough to go up against the older players in the league yet. We had 45 minutes split between Schlundt and Moesch on Tuesday, and they don't even check into the game until mop-up time, if at all.
This is the worst UW team in 25 years. I am not expecting UW to win tonight.
Are they better than stony brook and hartford?
I was at that game and they were missing Kaminsky due to concussion protocol, then their incredible guard went down (right in front of us) with an ankle injury ten minutes into the game, and we played well enough to win. Was exciting no matter how you slice it. We don't get many opportunities to beat historically good teams since they have to be down enough to be on our level, and this season in the B1G some teams are uncharacteristically down.well listen your best Wisconsin team didnt beat RU a few years ago so who knows
I was at that game and they were missing Kaminsky due to concussion protocol, then their incredible guard went down (right in front of us) with an ankle injury ten minutes into the game, and we played well enough to win. Was exciting no matter how you slice it. We don't get many opportunities to beat historically good teams since they have to be down enough to be on our level, and this season in the B1G some teams are uncharacteristically down.
what does that say for Indiana?
Highly touted at the time, and quick. Ran the offense well and was a matchup problem for us. When he went down the game slowed down for us, and without Kaminsky they couldn't run their usual sets. I didn't follow him after that, but he was good.I wouldn't call Jimmie Jackson's son incredible. They ended up doing OK without him.
Agreed, but it did take a little bit of adjustment time. Jackson was a lot more important for his leadership on that team than his actual basketball ability.I wouldn't call Jimmie Jackson's son incredible. They ended up doing OK without him.
The Book here has it RU +2 1/2My Vegas guy has Rutgers +2.5 as one of his locks of the night. I was surprised to see that.
Not an unreasonable question, but most of us like him. Outside of Happ, there isn't much experience with this club, which is very abnormal. Even when the team turned over from the Kaminsky/Dekker years, Koenig & Hayes had played significant minutes, and the transition was relatively smooth. not this year, though the frosh look pretty good, so the future should still be relatively bright. We did lose a major recruit for next year who had committed to UW and switched to Kentucky. That hurt and has a few people wondering about Gard's recruiting abilities. But overall, he's a Wisconsin born & bred guy, which is a strong preference in all 3 of our major sports (hockey is considered a revenue sport at UW). The football program is led by a guy who grew up within walking distance of the stadium, played for the Badgers, and both coordinators are former players, too (the only other school that can say that is Air Force). The hockey program is coached by longtime NHL'er and Badger legend Tony Granato.Is Gard the right guy or is he a bridge?
Should have waited it's +3 nowMy Vegas guy has Rutgers +2.5 as one of his locks of the night. I was surprised to see that.
The Book here has it RU +2 1/2
I'll take it, but my reaction was the same as yours.I'm not surprised at the spread, I'm surprised we're the lock.