RU +17 vs. Miami
- Thread starter Groz
- Start date
Lock of the week, take Rutgers +17!
I'd be concerned about UM's zone defense against us. If it's effective and our perimeter shooting is poor, we will have trouble scoring. Add in the test we will get on the boards and you can see us not cracking the 50 point mark in this game.
We play good defense. Hold them under 40% and rebound.
I like what I've seen from us. Schedule be damned. I think we've led by 19 in the 2nd half of every game except Hartford.
I think everyone on this roster is better at the end of the season. Sa, Umeyori and Corey are my bets for biggest improvements from here out. Maybe Laurent too. Cant be better than Nigel, Mike and Gettys have been. Have to be a fan of Thiam. And Pikiell gets everything possible out of Freeman.
We're pretty good. And really well coached.
I like what I've seen from us. Schedule be damned. I think we've led by 19 in the 2nd half of every game except Hartford.
I think everyone on this roster is better at the end of the season. Sa, Umeyori and Corey are my bets for biggest improvements from here out. Maybe Laurent too. Cant be better than Nigel, Mike and Gettys have been. Have to be a fan of Thiam. And Pikiell gets everything possible out of Freeman.
We're pretty good. And really well coached.
Last edited:
Wish I was in Vegas. Maybe Miami does that if we keep fouling at the end. They might be good enough to halt R complete game plan-or the team gets distracted by Miami.
If I am Miami why would I want to put the game in the hands of Rutgers perimeter shooters. I'd rather put the game in my own teams ability to defend in man and more importantly rebound out of it.
We haven't shot it well, but are totally capable of a 11-24 type of day.
Of our guards and wings only Corey isn't a legitimate threat to take and make 3s.
While Sanders has taken just 11 3's this season, so far, in 6 games, and has hit just 1 of those, he did shoot 31% from 3 last year. Not great, but not awful, either. My point is, that if Sanders has an open 3, he should be considered a threat to take it, and make it. Though clearly, he is being encouraged NOT to settle for the 3.
I get your general point, but Sanders could be a 3-point threat if not defended well.
+17 looks waaaaaayyyyy too easy. Stick to the formula of all out D and rebounding and take care of the ball.
This is a team that just beat Hartford at home by 2 and has DePaul as it's best win. I would consider Miami to be a 2/3 nit seed with potential for the NCAA if they hit their stride. I expect ru to cover but not my much.
Had to go to the media guide for this one......
11/16/12 - beat Princeton at Jadwin 58-52
11/25/12 - beat UNC Greensboro at Greensboro Coliseum 87-80
It's been 4 years since Mike Rice pulled that one off.
Well so far this was a spot-on analysis on the first ten minutes of the game. We'll crack the 50-point mark and can win due to adjustments (Sa is making a big difference down low). But inside we are shooting poorly. If Freeman shakes off the jitters and becomes a half-presence inside 12 feet, that will help. Also like to see Thiam have his feet set for the ball and shoot some threes.
Sanders is-at best-an average outside shooter. May be how we got him. Going to the basket, he's very good and quick as lightning.
Similar threads
