Do we want to get into a shootout with them though?Their defense
Attack attack attack
Their guards are exploitable with the press I say. Until any team makes us pay for pressing, we have to keep rolling with it. That's been our bread and butter and what makes our defense so specialDo we want to get into a shootout with them though?
How much do we press?
If you give up 90 to Indiana you don’t have that leg to stand onTheir fans think defense is their strongest asset.
I haven’t watched them much so I can’t argue the point.
I’m sure you read that Scangg
If you're talking about their response to my post on how amazing our D has been this year on the Iowa board...Their fans think defense is their strongest asset.
I haven’t watched them much so I can’t argue the point.
I’m sure you read that Scangg
I'm worried about Rebraca actually. He's very good. I think he could give Cliff problems. He seems to struggle more against the crafty skilled scorersNot a lot of size. Definitely need to feed Cliff.
Rebraca is tough he’d fit in with usI'm worried about Rebraca actually. He's very good. I think he could give Cliff problems. He seems to struggle more against the crafty skilled scorers
Fran's dooshi-nessAnyone?
All the time. This team is built for that pressHow much do we press?
Only issue is Cliff really has not demonstrated he can score posting up even against smaller teams. Think more the formula against a weak defensive team is penetrate and then dish to Cliff for easy bucketsNot a lot of size. Definitely need to feed Cliff.
Their defense
Attack attack attack
Agree. Feeding Cliff is not a good offensive philosophy. Too many turnovers and too many shots just thrown at the hoop. Of course we have to force the D to cover the inside game but Cliff still can’t read what he does and doesn’t have available. I may be alone in this but I think Wolf is already a superior back-to-the-basket player.Only issue is Cliff really has not demonstrated he can score posting up even against smaller teams. Think more the formula against a weak defensive team is penetrate and then dish to Cliff for easy buckets
Recipe for disaster at the RACIt appears Iowa really has only two dependable players who can be tough and score. That's Murray and Rebraca. Everyone else seems soft and hesitant when pressured by the situation. The other players have skills but can't tap into them when they feel rushed or nervous. By their standards, they play great defense, but by any other standard it's weak.
Yeah the press is working exceptional. Even when there’s someone open and they get a pass off, most of the time it’s either a picked off by one of our guys, they pass it out of bounds, or it’s not accurate so by the time the guy corrals it someone is already on him.Their guards are exploitable with the press I say. Until any team makes us pay for pressing, we have to keep rolling with it. That's been our bread and butter and what makes our defense so special
Iowa is soft, as usual
Get him Teed up and ejected.Fran's dooshi-ness
Most teams can't simulate the press, so it isn't easy to prepare for it. Besides, the main impact of the press is to chew up the shot clock and force teams to rush their offense in an attempt to score. The result of this is usually a turnover or a poor shot attempt. Although Iowa doesn't turn the ball over, that is mainly because teams pick them up in the half-court set. Iowa doesn't have great ball handlers or passers. Iowa is at its best when they can run its half-court sets without much disruption. The good thing is Rutgers doesn't subscribe to that theory.Looking at Iowa, they are exceptional at 1 thing, not turning over the ball. They are the 4th best team in the country here. They are actually quite average on other offensive statistics. They do not shoot exceptionally well. Their tempo is above average, 43 in the country but not exceptional. Defensively not good, but not horrible to be fair, only thing they do "well" is not fouling a lot. Interesting stat on D, opposing teams take a high % of their shots as "inside 2s" and a low % of their shots as "3s". Given they do not foul a lot this is really strange. Appears they give up a lot of drives to the hoop (remember they do not turn it over much, so inside 2s are not coming in transition typically) BUT they foul very little. Is this the literal definition of "SOFT" in basketball :-)? (i.e. give up well above average % of close 2s but have exceptionally low % of fouling)
Do not think the formula for us is to push the tempo offensively. But to me this is a clear formula to keep the defensive strategy we have been employing, full court press and incredible defensive pressure. They give up some turn overs and I think they are toast. Their formula to win is really is not to turn the ball over and hope they shoot decent FG%. Even in their last two B10 losses, they turned the ball over 13 total times in the two games, and still lost.
Agree with everything here, Doug. I bet for thre last couple of days that we have practiced QUICKLY setting up our press on made baskets. Iowa takes the ball out of the net, and we will need to set up EXTREMELY quickly, or we lose the opportunity altogether.Most teams can't simulate the press, so it isn't easy to prepare for it. Besides, the main impact of the press is to chew up the shot clock and force teams to rush their offense in an attempt to score. The result of this is usually a turnover or a poor shot attempt. Although Iowa doesn't turn the ball over, that is mainly because teams pick them up in the half-court set. Iowa doesn't have great ball handlers or passers. Iowa is at its best when they can run its half-court sets without much disruption. The good thing is Rutgers doesn't subscribe to that theory.
Iowa's lack of size could be a significant factor in the game. Rutgers should be able to play from inside outside against the Hawkeyes. If Rutgers can establish a post presence, Spencer should have some nice looks from the outside. Mulcahy should be able to post up. McConnell's mid-range game should be a full go, as Iowa won't challenge it like other teams for fear of fouling. I suspect Iowa will play a lot of zone to hide the issues with playing man-to-man against Rutgers. Still, Rutgers should be able to work the free-throw area to attack the zone for either a shot from there, the low post area, or a kick out for a three.
Iowa averages over 75 points a game which Rutgers can't match.The game must be decided in the 60-68 point range.Last time we saw Iowa they were blowing our doors off in the B1GT in the 4/5 game. For all the success we have had against Indiana and Purdue I feel the opposite is true for Iowa. Their style has proven difficult for us.
Facts:Iowa averages over 75 points a game which Rutgers can't match.The game must be decided in the 60-68 point range.